Jennifer Fay Kawwass, Heather S Hipp, Donna R Session, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson
{"title":"卵巢储备功能减退的严重程度与辅助生殖技术的成功几率","authors":"Jennifer Fay Kawwass, Heather S Hipp, Donna R Session, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the relationship between severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort including all United States’ fertility centers reporting to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, 2004–2012. Among women aged <41 (504,266 fresh autologous IVF cycles), we calculated cancellation rate/cycle and pregnancy rate/transfer, stratified by age, by maximum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Cancellation rate per cycle and pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates per transfer were compared among women with and without DOR. We used multivariable log binomial regression, stratified by age, to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) for the association between DOR and these outcomes and, within DOR groups, between stimulation type and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancellation rate/cycle increased with increasing FSH and with DOR severity. For women aged <35 who underwent transfer, aRR for pregnancy and live birth indicated slightly reduced likelihood of these outcomes (severe vs. no DOR); confidence intervals approached the null. Among women with severe DOR, stimulation type was not associated with likelihood of pregnancy or live birth per transfer in any group except women ages 38–40.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with severe DOR are at significantly increased risk of cancellation; however, those who undergo transfer have pregnancy and live birth chances similar to those of women without DOR after controlling for cycle characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 3-4","pages":"153-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severity of Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Chance of Success with Assisted Reproductive Technology.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Fay Kawwass, Heather S Hipp, Donna R Session, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the relationship between severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort including all United States’ fertility centers reporting to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, 2004–2012. Among women aged <41 (504,266 fresh autologous IVF cycles), we calculated cancellation rate/cycle and pregnancy rate/transfer, stratified by age, by maximum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Cancellation rate per cycle and pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates per transfer were compared among women with and without DOR. We used multivariable log binomial regression, stratified by age, to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) for the association between DOR and these outcomes and, within DOR groups, between stimulation type and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancellation rate/cycle increased with increasing FSH and with DOR severity. For women aged <35 who underwent transfer, aRR for pregnancy and live birth indicated slightly reduced likelihood of these outcomes (severe vs. no DOR); confidence intervals approached the null. Among women with severe DOR, stimulation type was not associated with likelihood of pregnancy or live birth per transfer in any group except women ages 38–40.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with severe DOR are at significantly increased risk of cancellation; however, those who undergo transfer have pregnancy and live birth chances similar to those of women without DOR after controlling for cycle characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"62 3-4\",\"pages\":\"153-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述严重卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)与辅助生殖技术结果之间的关系:描述严重卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)与辅助生殖技术结果之间的关系:研究设计:回顾性队列,包括 2004-2012 年向美国疾病预防控制中心国家 ART 监测系统报告的所有美国生育中心。研究对象:2004-2012 年间所有向美国疾病预防控制中心全国 ART 监测系统报告的美国生育中心:取消率/周期随 FSH 增加和 DOR 严重程度增加而增加。岁女性 结论:有严重 DOR 的女性取消受孕的风险明显增加;然而,在控制周期特征后,接受移植的女性怀孕和活产的几率与没有 DOR 的女性相似。
Severity of Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Chance of Success with Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Objective: To describe the relationship between severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
Study design: Retrospective cohort including all United States’ fertility centers reporting to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, 2004–2012. Among women aged <41 (504,266 fresh autologous IVF cycles), we calculated cancellation rate/cycle and pregnancy rate/transfer, stratified by age, by maximum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Cancellation rate per cycle and pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates per transfer were compared among women with and without DOR. We used multivariable log binomial regression, stratified by age, to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) for the association between DOR and these outcomes and, within DOR groups, between stimulation type and outcomes.
Results: Cancellation rate/cycle increased with increasing FSH and with DOR severity. For women aged <35 who underwent transfer, aRR for pregnancy and live birth indicated slightly reduced likelihood of these outcomes (severe vs. no DOR); confidence intervals approached the null. Among women with severe DOR, stimulation type was not associated with likelihood of pregnancy or live birth per transfer in any group except women ages 38–40.
Conclusion: Women with severe DOR are at significantly increased risk of cancellation; however, those who undergo transfer have pregnancy and live birth chances similar to those of women without DOR after controlling for cycle characteristics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.