卵巢储备功能减退的严重程度与辅助生殖技术的成功几率

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-03-01
Jennifer Fay Kawwass, Heather S Hipp, Donna R Session, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson
{"title":"卵巢储备功能减退的严重程度与辅助生殖技术的成功几率","authors":"Jennifer Fay Kawwass, Heather S Hipp, Donna R Session, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the relationship between severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort including all United States’ fertility centers reporting to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, 2004–2012. Among women aged <41 (504,266 fresh autologous IVF cycles), we calculated cancellation rate/cycle and pregnancy rate/transfer, stratified by age, by maximum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Cancellation rate per cycle and pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates per transfer were compared among women with and without DOR. We used multivariable log binomial regression, stratified by age, to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) for the association between DOR and these outcomes and, within DOR groups, between stimulation type and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancellation rate/cycle increased with increasing FSH and with DOR severity. For women aged <35 who underwent transfer, aRR for pregnancy and live birth indicated slightly reduced likelihood of these outcomes (severe vs. no DOR); confidence intervals approached the null. Among women with severe DOR, stimulation type was not associated with likelihood of pregnancy or live birth per transfer in any group except women ages 38–40.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with severe DOR are at significantly increased risk of cancellation; however, those who undergo transfer have pregnancy and live birth chances similar to those of women without DOR after controlling for cycle characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 3-4","pages":"153-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severity of Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Chance of Success with Assisted Reproductive Technology.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Fay Kawwass, Heather S Hipp, Donna R Session, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the relationship between severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort including all United States’ fertility centers reporting to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, 2004–2012. Among women aged <41 (504,266 fresh autologous IVF cycles), we calculated cancellation rate/cycle and pregnancy rate/transfer, stratified by age, by maximum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Cancellation rate per cycle and pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates per transfer were compared among women with and without DOR. We used multivariable log binomial regression, stratified by age, to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) for the association between DOR and these outcomes and, within DOR groups, between stimulation type and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancellation rate/cycle increased with increasing FSH and with DOR severity. For women aged <35 who underwent transfer, aRR for pregnancy and live birth indicated slightly reduced likelihood of these outcomes (severe vs. no DOR); confidence intervals approached the null. Among women with severe DOR, stimulation type was not associated with likelihood of pregnancy or live birth per transfer in any group except women ages 38–40.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with severe DOR are at significantly increased risk of cancellation; however, those who undergo transfer have pregnancy and live birth chances similar to those of women without DOR after controlling for cycle characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"62 3-4\",\"pages\":\"153-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述严重卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)与辅助生殖技术结果之间的关系:描述严重卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)与辅助生殖技术结果之间的关系:研究设计:回顾性队列,包括 2004-2012 年向美国疾病预防控制中心国家 ART 监测系统报告的所有美国生育中心。研究对象:2004-2012 年间所有向美国疾病预防控制中心全国 ART 监测系统报告的美国生育中心:取消率/周期随 FSH 增加和 DOR 严重程度增加而增加。岁女性 结论:有严重 DOR 的女性取消受孕的风险明显增加;然而,在控制周期特征后,接受移植的女性怀孕和活产的几率与没有 DOR 的女性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severity of Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Chance of Success with Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Objective: To describe the relationship between severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

Study design: Retrospective cohort including all United States’ fertility centers reporting to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, 2004–2012. Among women aged <41 (504,266 fresh autologous IVF cycles), we calculated cancellation rate/cycle and pregnancy rate/transfer, stratified by age, by maximum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Cancellation rate per cycle and pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates per transfer were compared among women with and without DOR. We used multivariable log binomial regression, stratified by age, to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) for the association between DOR and these outcomes and, within DOR groups, between stimulation type and outcomes.

Results: Cancellation rate/cycle increased with increasing FSH and with DOR severity. For women aged <35 who underwent transfer, aRR for pregnancy and live birth indicated slightly reduced likelihood of these outcomes (severe vs. no DOR); confidence intervals approached the null. Among women with severe DOR, stimulation type was not associated with likelihood of pregnancy or live birth per transfer in any group except women ages 38–40.

Conclusion: Women with severe DOR are at significantly increased risk of cancellation; however, those who undergo transfer have pregnancy and live birth chances similar to those of women without DOR after controlling for cycle characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信