自体子宫内膜共培养与传统体外受精的随机对照试验。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-05-01
Kristin Van Heertum, Stephen Somkuti, Jennifer Nichols, Jay Schinfeld, Michael Sobel, Larry Barmat
{"title":"自体子宫内膜共培养与传统体外受精的随机对照试验。","authors":"Kristin Van Heertum,&nbsp;Stephen Somkuti,&nbsp;Jennifer Nichols,&nbsp;Jay Schinfeld,&nbsp;Michael Sobel,&nbsp;Larry Barmat","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To determine if autologous endometrial cell coculture improves embryo development and clinical outcomes.\n\nSTUDY DESIGN: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) (control, n=73) or autologous endometrial cell coculture (AECC) (n=61). All patients underwent endometrial biopsy on cycle day 5–10 post luteinizing hormone surge. A total of 129 patients underwent embryo transfer (69 control, 60 AECC). Clinical outcomes as well as embryonic quality measures were then compared between the 2 groups.\n\nRESULTS: The mean age, day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone, number of oocytes collected, and clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Embryo development was overall similar, with the exception that embryonic grade was significantly better with AECC than with control: 1.5 (0.04) vs. 2.6 (0.03), p<0.0001. There was no difference in implantation, live birth or multiple gestation rates.\n\nCONCLUSION: This is one of the largest prospective randomized controlled trials of AECC versus traditional IVF. There was significant improvement in embryo morphology in the coculture group, although clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. Further studies are necessary to achieve enough power to fully delineate the effects of coculture on IVF outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 5-6","pages":"329-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial of Autologous Endometrial Coculture Versus Traditional in Vitro Fertilization.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Van Heertum,&nbsp;Stephen Somkuti,&nbsp;Jennifer Nichols,&nbsp;Jay Schinfeld,&nbsp;Michael Sobel,&nbsp;Larry Barmat\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To determine if autologous endometrial cell coculture improves embryo development and clinical outcomes.\\n\\nSTUDY DESIGN: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) (control, n=73) or autologous endometrial cell coculture (AECC) (n=61). All patients underwent endometrial biopsy on cycle day 5–10 post luteinizing hormone surge. A total of 129 patients underwent embryo transfer (69 control, 60 AECC). Clinical outcomes as well as embryonic quality measures were then compared between the 2 groups.\\n\\nRESULTS: The mean age, day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone, number of oocytes collected, and clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Embryo development was overall similar, with the exception that embryonic grade was significantly better with AECC than with control: 1.5 (0.04) vs. 2.6 (0.03), p<0.0001. There was no difference in implantation, live birth or multiple gestation rates.\\n\\nCONCLUSION: This is one of the largest prospective randomized controlled trials of AECC versus traditional IVF. There was significant improvement in embryo morphology in the coculture group, although clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. Further studies are necessary to achieve enough power to fully delineate the effects of coculture on IVF outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"62 5-6\",\"pages\":\"329-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定自体子宫内膜细胞共培养是否能改善胚胎发育和临床结果。研究设计:符合纳入标准的患者随机分为传统体外受精(IVF)组(对照,n=73)和自体子宫内膜细胞共培养组(n=61)。所有患者在黄体生成素激增后的第5-10天进行子宫内膜活检。129例患者接受胚胎移植(对照组69例,AECC 60例)。然后比较两组的临床结果和胚胎质量指标。结果:两组患者的平均年龄、第3天促卵泡激素、收集卵母细胞数及临床结果相似。胚胎发育总体上相似,除了AECC组的胚胎等级明显优于对照组:1.5(0.04)比2.6 (0.03),p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized Controlled Trial of Autologous Endometrial Coculture Versus Traditional in Vitro Fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if autologous endometrial cell coculture improves embryo development and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) (control, n=73) or autologous endometrial cell coculture (AECC) (n=61). All patients underwent endometrial biopsy on cycle day 5–10 post luteinizing hormone surge. A total of 129 patients underwent embryo transfer (69 control, 60 AECC). Clinical outcomes as well as embryonic quality measures were then compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age, day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone, number of oocytes collected, and clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Embryo development was overall similar, with the exception that embryonic grade was significantly better with AECC than with control: 1.5 (0.04) vs. 2.6 (0.03), p<0.0001. There was no difference in implantation, live birth or multiple gestation rates. CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest prospective randomized controlled trials of AECC versus traditional IVF. There was significant improvement in embryo morphology in the coculture group, although clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. Further studies are necessary to achieve enough power to fully delineate the effects of coculture on IVF outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信