阴道黄体酮凝胶用于卵裂期胚胎移植后黄体支持:一天一次还是两次?

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Bulent Urman, Serdar Celik, Kayhan Yakin, Ebru Alper, Basak Balaban, Baris Ata
{"title":"阴道黄体酮凝胶用于卵裂期胚胎移植后黄体支持:一天一次还是两次?","authors":"Bulent Urman,&nbsp;Serdar Celik,&nbsp;Kayhan Yakin,&nbsp;Ebru Alper,&nbsp;Basak Balaban,&nbsp;Baris Ata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To determine whether twice daily dosing of progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) is better for luteal phase support (LPS) than once daily dosing.\n\nSTUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including 456 women aged ≤42 years who underwent assisted reproductive technology with long GnRH agonist protocol. Blastocyst transfers and difficult embryo transfers were excluded. LPS was started with 90 mg PVG once daily on the evening of oocyte retrieval and continued until negative pregnancy test or 10th week of pregnancy in both groups. PVG dosage was doubled on the day of embryo transfer in the twice-daily group.\n\nRESULTS: Age, duration of infertility, and number of oocytes collected were similar. Numbers of embryos transferred were 2.9 and 2.8 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively (p=0.04). Embryo implantation (23.96% vs. 27.95%) and clinical pregnancy (50.9% vs. 56.5%) rates favored twice-daily dosage; however, differences were statistically nonsignificant, and the study had 20% power to demonstrate significance. When our results were pooled with a prior trial comparing once and twice daily dosing, twice daily dosing seemed to significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (rate ratio: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38).\n\nCONCLUSION: Trends favoring twice daily dosing are encouraging findings\nand require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"62 1-2","pages":"60-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Support After Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer: Once or Twice a Day?\",\"authors\":\"Bulent Urman,&nbsp;Serdar Celik,&nbsp;Kayhan Yakin,&nbsp;Ebru Alper,&nbsp;Basak Balaban,&nbsp;Baris Ata\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To determine whether twice daily dosing of progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) is better for luteal phase support (LPS) than once daily dosing.\\n\\nSTUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including 456 women aged ≤42 years who underwent assisted reproductive technology with long GnRH agonist protocol. Blastocyst transfers and difficult embryo transfers were excluded. LPS was started with 90 mg PVG once daily on the evening of oocyte retrieval and continued until negative pregnancy test or 10th week of pregnancy in both groups. PVG dosage was doubled on the day of embryo transfer in the twice-daily group.\\n\\nRESULTS: Age, duration of infertility, and number of oocytes collected were similar. Numbers of embryos transferred were 2.9 and 2.8 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively (p=0.04). Embryo implantation (23.96% vs. 27.95%) and clinical pregnancy (50.9% vs. 56.5%) rates favored twice-daily dosage; however, differences were statistically nonsignificant, and the study had 20% power to demonstrate significance. When our results were pooled with a prior trial comparing once and twice daily dosing, twice daily dosing seemed to significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (rate ratio: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38).\\n\\nCONCLUSION: Trends favoring twice daily dosing are encouraging findings\\nand require further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"62 1-2\",\"pages\":\"60-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定每日两次给药的孕酮阴道凝胶(PVG)是否优于每日一次给药的黄体期支持(LPS)。研究设计:回顾性研究包括456名年龄≤42岁的妇女,她们接受了长期GnRH激动剂方案的辅助生殖技术。排除囊胚移植和困难的胚胎移植。两组患者在卵母细胞回收当晚以90mg PVG开始LPS治疗,每日1次,持续至妊娠试验阴性或妊娠第10周。每日两次组PVG剂量在胚胎移植当天增加一倍。结果:年龄、不孕症持续时间、收集的卵母细胞数量相似。每日1次组和每日2次组的移植胚胎数分别为2.9个和2.8个(p=0.04)。胚胎着床率(23.96% vs. 27.95%)和临床妊娠率(50.9% vs. 56.5%)倾向于每日两次剂量;然而,差异在统计学上不显著,该研究有20%的能力证明显著性。当我们的结果与先前比较每日一次和两次给药的试验合并时,每日两次给药似乎显著增加临床妊娠率(比率比:1.18,95% CI 1.01-1.38)。结论:倾向于每日两次给药的趋势是令人鼓舞的发现,需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Support After Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer: Once or Twice a Day?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether twice daily dosing of progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) is better for luteal phase support (LPS) than once daily dosing. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including 456 women aged ≤42 years who underwent assisted reproductive technology with long GnRH agonist protocol. Blastocyst transfers and difficult embryo transfers were excluded. LPS was started with 90 mg PVG once daily on the evening of oocyte retrieval and continued until negative pregnancy test or 10th week of pregnancy in both groups. PVG dosage was doubled on the day of embryo transfer in the twice-daily group. RESULTS: Age, duration of infertility, and number of oocytes collected were similar. Numbers of embryos transferred were 2.9 and 2.8 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively (p=0.04). Embryo implantation (23.96% vs. 27.95%) and clinical pregnancy (50.9% vs. 56.5%) rates favored twice-daily dosage; however, differences were statistically nonsignificant, and the study had 20% power to demonstrate significance. When our results were pooled with a prior trial comparing once and twice daily dosing, twice daily dosing seemed to significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (rate ratio: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38). CONCLUSION: Trends favoring twice daily dosing are encouraging findings and require further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信