前额叶经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对表现轻中度暴食型行为的女性食物渴望、食物奖励和主观食欲无影响

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jordan D. Beaumont , Michelle Dalton , Danielle Davis , Graham Finlayson , Alexander Nowicky , Mark Russell , Martin J. Barwood
{"title":"前额叶经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对表现轻中度暴食型行为的女性食物渴望、食物奖励和主观食欲无影响","authors":"Jordan D. Beaumont ,&nbsp;Michelle Dalton ,&nbsp;Danielle Davis ,&nbsp;Graham Finlayson ,&nbsp;Alexander Nowicky ,&nbsp;Mark Russell ,&nbsp;Martin J. Barwood","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2023.106997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous work suggests there may be an effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on appetite control in people at risk of overconsumption, however findings are inconsistent. This study aimed to further understand the potential eating behaviour trait-dependent effect of tDCS, specifically in those with binge-type behaviour. Seventeen females (23 ± 7 years, 25.4 ± 3.8 kg m<sup>−2</sup>) with mild-to-moderate binge eating behaviour completed two sessions of double-blind, randomised and counterbalanced anodal and sham tDCS applied over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 2.0 mA for 20 min. Subjective appetite visual analogue scales (VAS), the Food Craving Questionnaire-State (FCQ-S), and Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) were completed pre- and post-tDCS. Participants then consumed a fixed-energy meal, followed by the VAS, FCQ-S and LFPQ. No difference between pre- and post-tDCS scores were found across fullness (p = 0.275, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.040), prospective consumption (p = 0.127, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.063), desire to eat (p = 0.247, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.054) or FCQ-S measures (p = 0.918, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.040) when comparing active and sham protocols. Only explicit liking and wanting for high-fat sweet foods were significantly different between conditions, with increased scores following active tDCS. When controlling for baseline hunger, the significant differences were removed (p = 0.138 to 0.161, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.810 to 1.074). The present data does not support the eating behaviour trait dependency of tDCS in a specific cohort of female participants with mild-to-moderate binge eating scores, and results align with those from individuals with healthy trait scores. This suggests participants with sub-clinical binge eating behaviour do not respond to tDCS. Future work should further explore effects in clinical and sub-clinical populations displaying susceptibility to overconsumption and weight gain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 106997"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No effect of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving, food reward and subjective appetite in females displaying mild-to-moderate binge-type behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Jordan D. Beaumont ,&nbsp;Michelle Dalton ,&nbsp;Danielle Davis ,&nbsp;Graham Finlayson ,&nbsp;Alexander Nowicky ,&nbsp;Mark Russell ,&nbsp;Martin J. Barwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2023.106997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous work suggests there may be an effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on appetite control in people at risk of overconsumption, however findings are inconsistent. This study aimed to further understand the potential eating behaviour trait-dependent effect of tDCS, specifically in those with binge-type behaviour. Seventeen females (23 ± 7 years, 25.4 ± 3.8 kg m<sup>−2</sup>) with mild-to-moderate binge eating behaviour completed two sessions of double-blind, randomised and counterbalanced anodal and sham tDCS applied over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 2.0 mA for 20 min. Subjective appetite visual analogue scales (VAS), the Food Craving Questionnaire-State (FCQ-S), and Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) were completed pre- and post-tDCS. Participants then consumed a fixed-energy meal, followed by the VAS, FCQ-S and LFPQ. No difference between pre- and post-tDCS scores were found across fullness (p = 0.275, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.040), prospective consumption (p = 0.127, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.063), desire to eat (p = 0.247, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.054) or FCQ-S measures (p = 0.918, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.040) when comparing active and sham protocols. Only explicit liking and wanting for high-fat sweet foods were significantly different between conditions, with increased scores following active tDCS. When controlling for baseline hunger, the significant differences were removed (p = 0.138 to 0.161, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.810 to 1.074). The present data does not support the eating behaviour trait dependency of tDCS in a specific cohort of female participants with mild-to-moderate binge eating scores, and results align with those from individuals with healthy trait scores. This suggests participants with sub-clinical binge eating behaviour do not respond to tDCS. Future work should further explore effects in clinical and sub-clinical populations displaying susceptibility to overconsumption and weight gain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323024595\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323024595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可能对有过度消费风险的人的食欲控制有影响,但研究结果并不一致。本研究旨在进一步了解tDCS对饮食行为特征的潜在依赖效应,特别是对那些暴食型行为的影响。17名有轻度至中度暴食行为的女性(23±7岁,25.4±3.8 kg m−2)完成了两组双盲、随机和平衡的负极和假tDCS,在2.0 mA下,在右侧背外侧前额叶皮层上应用,持续20分钟。主观食欲视觉模拟量表(VAS)、食物渴望问卷状态(FCQ-S)和利兹食物偏好问卷(LFPQ)分别在tDCS前后完成。然后,参与者吃了一顿固定能量餐,然后进行了VAS、FCQ-S和LFPQ测试。tdcs前后评分在饱腹感(p = 0.275, BF10 = 0.040)、预期消费(p = 0.127, BF10 = 0.063)、食欲(p = 0.247, BF10 = 0.054)或FCQ-S测量(p = 0.918, BF10 = 0.040)方面均无差异。在两种情况下,只有对高脂肪甜食的显性喜欢和渴望有显著差异,tDCS活动后得分增加。当控制基线饥饿时,显著差异被消除(p = 0.138至0.161,BF10 = 0.810至1.074)。目前的数据不支持tDCS对轻至中度暴食评分的女性参与者的饮食行为特征依赖,结果与健康特征评分的个体一致。这表明有亚临床暴食行为的参与者对tDCS没有反应。未来的工作应进一步探索对临床和亚临床人群的影响,显示对过度消费和体重增加的易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No effect of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving, food reward and subjective appetite in females displaying mild-to-moderate binge-type behaviour

Previous work suggests there may be an effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on appetite control in people at risk of overconsumption, however findings are inconsistent. This study aimed to further understand the potential eating behaviour trait-dependent effect of tDCS, specifically in those with binge-type behaviour. Seventeen females (23 ± 7 years, 25.4 ± 3.8 kg m−2) with mild-to-moderate binge eating behaviour completed two sessions of double-blind, randomised and counterbalanced anodal and sham tDCS applied over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 2.0 mA for 20 min. Subjective appetite visual analogue scales (VAS), the Food Craving Questionnaire-State (FCQ-S), and Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) were completed pre- and post-tDCS. Participants then consumed a fixed-energy meal, followed by the VAS, FCQ-S and LFPQ. No difference between pre- and post-tDCS scores were found across fullness (p = 0.275, BF10 = 0.040), prospective consumption (p = 0.127, BF10 = 0.063), desire to eat (p = 0.247, BF10 = 0.054) or FCQ-S measures (p = 0.918, BF10 = 0.040) when comparing active and sham protocols. Only explicit liking and wanting for high-fat sweet foods were significantly different between conditions, with increased scores following active tDCS. When controlling for baseline hunger, the significant differences were removed (p = 0.138 to 0.161, BF10 = 0.810 to 1.074). The present data does not support the eating behaviour trait dependency of tDCS in a specific cohort of female participants with mild-to-moderate binge eating scores, and results align with those from individuals with healthy trait scores. This suggests participants with sub-clinical binge eating behaviour do not respond to tDCS. Future work should further explore effects in clinical and sub-clinical populations displaying susceptibility to overconsumption and weight gain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信