补贴改良豆科种子以增加家庭膳食多样性:来自马拉维农业投入补贴计划的证据,对解决各种形式的营养不良具有重要意义

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Mirriam Matita , Levison Chiwaula , Ephraim Wadonda Chirwa , Jacob Mazalale , Helen Walls
{"title":"补贴改良豆科种子以增加家庭膳食多样性:来自马拉维农业投入补贴计划的证据,对解决各种形式的营养不良具有重要意义","authors":"Mirriam Matita ,&nbsp;Levison Chiwaula ,&nbsp;Ephraim Wadonda Chirwa ,&nbsp;Jacob Mazalale ,&nbsp;Helen Walls","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many sub-Saharan African countries implementing agricultural input subsidies programmes (AISP) concentrate on fertilizers and staple food crops which may have little or no effect on consumption of diverse nutrient dense non-staple foods. The programme in Malawi – the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP) – includes legume seeds, but little research has been undertaken to evaluate the effects of this strategy on household dietary diversity. In this study, we used two waves of integrated household panel survey data of 2013 and 2016 to examine the dietary diversity gains from inclusion of legume seed coupons in the programme. The control function approach for dealing with selection bias into a programme is used in Poisson regression of panel data. The results show that access as well as redemption of legume coupons is positively associated with diversified diets. This is especially through location fixed effects in the southern region of Malawi, higher production diversity, greater land holding sizes and the sale of maize. Further, households that had less need to satisfy hunger through the growing of maize were those likely to redeem legume coupons. The results suggest a more nuanced pathway of impact from coupon access, redemption or type of crop produced to dietary diversity than the pathway that might be expected, and have implications for how best to understand and conceptualise the tensions and synergies between addressing different aspects of malnutrition in all its forms – and suggest the importance of addressing food insecurity constraints that potentially limit the growing of nutrient-rich legume crops as well as wider increases to dietary diversity. The results also point to the importance of the income pathway and food markets in facilitating greater dietary diversity. Further consideration of these issues by policymakers and the wider agri-nutrition community will be important to advance the discussion and research of how best to design AISP and other public policy to address malnutrition in all its forms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102309"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subsidizing improved legume seeds for increased household dietary diversity: Evidence from Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Programme with implications for addressing malnutrition in all its forms\",\"authors\":\"Mirriam Matita ,&nbsp;Levison Chiwaula ,&nbsp;Ephraim Wadonda Chirwa ,&nbsp;Jacob Mazalale ,&nbsp;Helen Walls\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many sub-Saharan African countries implementing agricultural input subsidies programmes (AISP) concentrate on fertilizers and staple food crops which may have little or no effect on consumption of diverse nutrient dense non-staple foods. The programme in Malawi – the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP) – includes legume seeds, but little research has been undertaken to evaluate the effects of this strategy on household dietary diversity. In this study, we used two waves of integrated household panel survey data of 2013 and 2016 to examine the dietary diversity gains from inclusion of legume seed coupons in the programme. The control function approach for dealing with selection bias into a programme is used in Poisson regression of panel data. The results show that access as well as redemption of legume coupons is positively associated with diversified diets. This is especially through location fixed effects in the southern region of Malawi, higher production diversity, greater land holding sizes and the sale of maize. Further, households that had less need to satisfy hunger through the growing of maize were those likely to redeem legume coupons. The results suggest a more nuanced pathway of impact from coupon access, redemption or type of crop produced to dietary diversity than the pathway that might be expected, and have implications for how best to understand and conceptualise the tensions and synergies between addressing different aspects of malnutrition in all its forms – and suggest the importance of addressing food insecurity constraints that potentially limit the growing of nutrient-rich legume crops as well as wider increases to dietary diversity. The results also point to the importance of the income pathway and food markets in facilitating greater dietary diversity. Further consideration of these issues by policymakers and the wider agri-nutrition community will be important to advance the discussion and research of how best to design AISP and other public policy to address malnutrition in all its forms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919222000859\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919222000859","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

许多执行农业投入补贴方案的撒哈拉以南非洲国家集中于肥料和主粮作物,这可能对各种营养丰富的副粮的消费影响不大或没有影响。马拉维的方案——农业投入补贴方案(FISP)——包括豆类种子,但很少进行研究来评估这一战略对家庭饮食多样性的影响。在这项研究中,我们使用了2013年和2016年两波综合家庭面板调查数据,以检验将豆类种子券纳入该计划所带来的饮食多样性收益。在面板数据的泊松回归中,采用控制函数方法将选择偏差处理到程序中。结果表明,豆类优惠券的获取和赎回与多样化饮食呈正相关。特别是通过马拉维南部地区的地点固定效应、更高的生产多样性、更大的土地持有规模和玉米销售。此外,那些不太需要通过种植玉米来满足饥饿的家庭更有可能兑换豆类优惠券。研究结果表明,优惠券获取、兑换或作物类型对饮食多样性的影响途径比预期的途径更微妙,并且对如何最好地理解和概念化解决各种形式营养不良的不同方面之间的紧张关系和协同作用具有启示意义——并且提出了解决粮食不安全制约因素的重要性,这些制约因素可能限制营养丰富的豆类作物的种植以及更广泛的饮食多样性的增加。研究结果还指出,收入途径和粮食市场在促进饮食多样性方面的重要性。决策者和更广泛的农业营养界对这些问题的进一步考虑,对于推动如何最好地设计AISP和其他公共政策以解决各种形式的营养不良问题的讨论和研究将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subsidizing improved legume seeds for increased household dietary diversity: Evidence from Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Programme with implications for addressing malnutrition in all its forms

Many sub-Saharan African countries implementing agricultural input subsidies programmes (AISP) concentrate on fertilizers and staple food crops which may have little or no effect on consumption of diverse nutrient dense non-staple foods. The programme in Malawi – the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP) – includes legume seeds, but little research has been undertaken to evaluate the effects of this strategy on household dietary diversity. In this study, we used two waves of integrated household panel survey data of 2013 and 2016 to examine the dietary diversity gains from inclusion of legume seed coupons in the programme. The control function approach for dealing with selection bias into a programme is used in Poisson regression of panel data. The results show that access as well as redemption of legume coupons is positively associated with diversified diets. This is especially through location fixed effects in the southern region of Malawi, higher production diversity, greater land holding sizes and the sale of maize. Further, households that had less need to satisfy hunger through the growing of maize were those likely to redeem legume coupons. The results suggest a more nuanced pathway of impact from coupon access, redemption or type of crop produced to dietary diversity than the pathway that might be expected, and have implications for how best to understand and conceptualise the tensions and synergies between addressing different aspects of malnutrition in all its forms – and suggest the importance of addressing food insecurity constraints that potentially limit the growing of nutrient-rich legume crops as well as wider increases to dietary diversity. The results also point to the importance of the income pathway and food markets in facilitating greater dietary diversity. Further consideration of these issues by policymakers and the wider agri-nutrition community will be important to advance the discussion and research of how best to design AISP and other public policy to address malnutrition in all its forms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信