教育技术的趋势:Facebook, Twitter和Scopus可以告诉我们当前的研究和实践。

IF 3.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
TechTrends Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6
Royce Kimmons, Joshua Rosenberg, Bohdana Allman
{"title":"教育技术的趋势:Facebook, Twitter和Scopus可以告诉我们当前的研究和实践。","authors":"Royce Kimmons,&nbsp;Joshua Rosenberg,&nbsp;Bohdana Allman","doi":"10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using large-scale, public data sources, this editorial provides a high-level description of educational technology trends leading up to and encompassing the year 2020. Data sources included (a) 17.9 million Facebook page posts by K-12 educational institutions in the U.S., (b) 131,760 tweets to the #EdTech hashtag on Twitter, and (c) 29,636 educational technology articles in the Scopus database. We provide a variety of descriptive results in the form of participation frequency charts, keyword matches, URL domain link counts, co-occurring hashtags, tweet text word trees, and common word and bigram frequencies. Results from the analysis of Facebook posts indicated that (a) schools increasingly used the platform over time, (b) the pandemic increased frequency (but not the nature) of use, (c) schools are progressively sharing more media, information, and tools, and (d) some of these tools align with trends identified by Weller (2020) while others do not. Analysis of tweets indicated that (a) discussions in 2020 revolved around \"remote learning\" and related topics, (b) this emphasis shifted or morphed into \"elearning\" and \"online learning\" as the year progressed, (c) shared posts were primarily informational or media-based, and (d) the space was heavily directed by a relatively small group of Superusers. Last, analysis of articles in Scopus indicated that (a) online learning is historically the most-researched topic in the field, (b) the past decade reflects a shift to more \"open\" and \"social\" topics, and (c) there seems to be a lag or disconnect between emergent high-interest technologies and research. Taken together, we conclude that these results show the field's preparation for addressing many challenges of 2020, but propose that, moving forward, we would be better served by embracing greater philosophical plurality and better addressing key issues, including equity and practicality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47534,"journal":{"name":"TechTrends","volume":"65 2","pages":"125-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Educational Technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus Can Tell us about Current Research and Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Royce Kimmons,&nbsp;Joshua Rosenberg,&nbsp;Bohdana Allman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using large-scale, public data sources, this editorial provides a high-level description of educational technology trends leading up to and encompassing the year 2020. Data sources included (a) 17.9 million Facebook page posts by K-12 educational institutions in the U.S., (b) 131,760 tweets to the #EdTech hashtag on Twitter, and (c) 29,636 educational technology articles in the Scopus database. We provide a variety of descriptive results in the form of participation frequency charts, keyword matches, URL domain link counts, co-occurring hashtags, tweet text word trees, and common word and bigram frequencies. Results from the analysis of Facebook posts indicated that (a) schools increasingly used the platform over time, (b) the pandemic increased frequency (but not the nature) of use, (c) schools are progressively sharing more media, information, and tools, and (d) some of these tools align with trends identified by Weller (2020) while others do not. Analysis of tweets indicated that (a) discussions in 2020 revolved around \\\"remote learning\\\" and related topics, (b) this emphasis shifted or morphed into \\\"elearning\\\" and \\\"online learning\\\" as the year progressed, (c) shared posts were primarily informational or media-based, and (d) the space was heavily directed by a relatively small group of Superusers. Last, analysis of articles in Scopus indicated that (a) online learning is historically the most-researched topic in the field, (b) the past decade reflects a shift to more \\\"open\\\" and \\\"social\\\" topics, and (c) there seems to be a lag or disconnect between emergent high-interest technologies and research. Taken together, we conclude that these results show the field's preparation for addressing many challenges of 2020, but propose that, moving forward, we would be better served by embracing greater philosophical plurality and better addressing key issues, including equity and practicality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TechTrends\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"125-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TechTrends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TechTrends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

这篇社论利用大规模的公共数据源,对2020年前后的教育技术趋势进行了高层次的描述。数据来源包括(a)美国K-12教育机构在Facebook上发布的1790万篇帖子,(b) Twitter上关于#EdTech标签的131,760条推文,以及(c) Scopus数据库中的29,636篇教育技术文章。我们以参与频率图表、关键字匹配、URL域链接计数、共同出现的标签、tweet文本词树以及常见单词和双字母频率的形式提供各种描述性结果。对Facebook帖子的分析结果表明:(a)随着时间的推移,学校越来越多地使用该平台,(b)疫情增加了使用频率(但不是性质),(c)学校逐渐共享更多的媒体、信息和工具,以及(d)其中一些工具符合韦勒(2020)确定的趋势,而另一些则不符合。对推文的分析表明:(a) 2020年的讨论围绕着“远程学习”和相关主题,(b)随着时间的推移,这种重点转移或演变为“电子学习”和“在线学习”,(c)分享的帖子主要是信息性的或基于媒体的,(d)空间主要由相对较小的超级用户群体主导。最后,对Scopus中文章的分析表明:(a)在线学习在历史上是该领域研究最多的主题,(b)过去十年反映了向更“开放”和“社交”主题的转变,以及(c)新兴的高兴趣技术与研究之间似乎存在滞后或脱节。综合起来,我们得出结论,这些结果表明该领域为应对2020年的许多挑战做好了准备,但我们建议,在未来,我们将更好地接受更大的哲学多元化,更好地解决关键问题,包括公平和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trends in Educational Technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus Can Tell us about Current Research and Practice.

Trends in Educational Technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus Can Tell us about Current Research and Practice.

Trends in Educational Technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus Can Tell us about Current Research and Practice.

Trends in Educational Technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus Can Tell us about Current Research and Practice.

Using large-scale, public data sources, this editorial provides a high-level description of educational technology trends leading up to and encompassing the year 2020. Data sources included (a) 17.9 million Facebook page posts by K-12 educational institutions in the U.S., (b) 131,760 tweets to the #EdTech hashtag on Twitter, and (c) 29,636 educational technology articles in the Scopus database. We provide a variety of descriptive results in the form of participation frequency charts, keyword matches, URL domain link counts, co-occurring hashtags, tweet text word trees, and common word and bigram frequencies. Results from the analysis of Facebook posts indicated that (a) schools increasingly used the platform over time, (b) the pandemic increased frequency (but not the nature) of use, (c) schools are progressively sharing more media, information, and tools, and (d) some of these tools align with trends identified by Weller (2020) while others do not. Analysis of tweets indicated that (a) discussions in 2020 revolved around "remote learning" and related topics, (b) this emphasis shifted or morphed into "elearning" and "online learning" as the year progressed, (c) shared posts were primarily informational or media-based, and (d) the space was heavily directed by a relatively small group of Superusers. Last, analysis of articles in Scopus indicated that (a) online learning is historically the most-researched topic in the field, (b) the past decade reflects a shift to more "open" and "social" topics, and (c) there seems to be a lag or disconnect between emergent high-interest technologies and research. Taken together, we conclude that these results show the field's preparation for addressing many challenges of 2020, but propose that, moving forward, we would be better served by embracing greater philosophical plurality and better addressing key issues, including equity and practicality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TechTrends
TechTrends EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: TechTrendsis a leading publication for professionals in the educational communication and technology field. As such its major purposes are: to provide a vehicle for the exchange of information among professional practitioners concerning the management of media and programs, the application of educational technology principles and techniques to instructional programs, corporate and military training, and any other kinds of information that can contribute to the advancement of knowledge of practice in the field, to provide a means by which practictioners can be kept current on the latest developments in the design, manufacture, and use of communications materials and devices; and to provide a vehicle for communication among the members of AECT to share information. TechTrends considers manuscripts of the following types:Reports of innovative and/or exemplary practice. General articles discussing matters of concern to practitioners. Critical reviews of important literature, materials, and devices related to the field. Summaries of research translated into practical application. Reports of developmental programs and trends of national and international significance. News of the latest products, both materials and devices, for use in the field. Articles of use to managers and various specializations within the general educational communications and technology field.TechTrends is a peer-reviewed publication, and submitted manuscripts are reviewed without bias by a panel of consulting editors and other professionals with expertise in the topics TechTrendsis a leading publication for professionals in the educational communication and technology field. As such its major purposes are: to provide a vehicle for the exchange of information among professional practitioners concerning the management of media and programs, the application of e ducational technology principles and techniques to instructional programs, corporate and military training, and any other kinds of information that can contribute to the advancement of knowledge of practice in the field, to provide a means by which practictioners can be kept current on the latest developments in the design, manufacture, and use of communications materials and devices; and to provide a vehicle for communication among the members of AECT to share information. TechTrends considers manuscripts of the following types:Reports of innovative and/or exemplary practice. General articles discussing matters of concern to practitioners. Critical reviews of important literature, materials, and devices related to the field. Summaries of research translated into practical application. Reports of developmental programs and trends of national and international significance. News of the latest products, both materials and devices, for use in the field. Articles of use to managers and various specializations within the general educational communications and technology field.TechTrends is a peer-reviewed publication, and submitted manuscripts are reviewed without bias by a panel of consulting editors and other professionals with expertise in the topics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信