为残疾学生提供的科学教科书建议分析。

IF 2.2 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Exceptional Children Pub Date : 1993-05-01 DOI:10.1177/001440299305900605

R S Parmar, J F Cawley

{"title":"为残疾学生提供的科学教科书建议分析。","authors":"R S Parmar, J F Cawley","doi":"10.1177/001440299305900605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers' manuals from three major elementary science textbook series were analyzed. These textbooks provided specific instructional recommendations for students with disabilities in mainstream classes. Findings reveal that (a) the textbooks did not provide recommendations for all categories of disabilities as defined in Public Law 94-142; (b) many recommendations did not specifically address the learning needs of the students for whom they were intended; and (c) there were no consistency in the nature of recommendations provided for any given category of disability. Results indicate that special education and mainstream teachers should monitor the usefulness of published materials that claim to meet the needs of students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"59 6","pages":"518-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001440299305900605","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of science textbook recommendations provided for students with disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"R S Parmar, J F Cawley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/001440299305900605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teachers' manuals from three major elementary science textbook series were analyzed. These textbooks provided specific instructional recommendations for students with disabilities in mainstream classes. Findings reveal that (a) the textbooks did not provide recommendations for all categories of disabilities as defined in Public Law 94-142; (b) many recommendations did not specifically address the learning needs of the students for whom they were intended; and (c) there were no consistency in the nature of recommendations provided for any given category of disability. Results indicate that special education and mainstream teachers should monitor the usefulness of published materials that claim to meet the needs of students with disabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptional Children\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"518-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001440299305900605\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptional Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299305900605\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299305900605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

摘要

对三大基础科学教材系列的教师手册进行了分析。这些教科书为主流班级的残疾学生提供了具体的教学建议。调查结果显示:(a)教科书没有为公法94-142中定义的所有类别的残疾提供建议;(b)许多建议并没有具体针对这些建议所针对的学生的学习需要;(c)针对任何特定类别的残疾提出的建议在性质上没有一致性。结果表明，特殊教育和主流教师应该对声称满足残疾学生需求的出版材料的有用性进行监测。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Analysis of science textbook recommendations provided for students with disabilities.

Teachers' manuals from three major elementary science textbook series were analyzed. These textbooks provided specific instructional recommendations for students with disabilities in mainstream classes. Findings reveal that (a) the textbooks did not provide recommendations for all categories of disabilities as defined in Public Law 94-142; (b) many recommendations did not specifically address the learning needs of the students for whom they were intended; and (c) there were no consistency in the nature of recommendations provided for any given category of disability. Results indicate that special education and mainstream teachers should monitor the usefulness of published materials that claim to meet the needs of students with disabilities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Exceptional Children Multiple-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.