Kelsey Diane May, Sean Rose, Cody Solesbee, Emily Divirgilio, Kathleen Shiplett, Ashley Davidson, Kelly McNally
{"title":"青少年脑震荡后持续症状的非可信认知表现对多学科治疗结果的影响","authors":"Kelsey Diane May, Sean Rose, Cody Solesbee, Emily Divirgilio, Kathleen Shiplett, Ashley Davidson, Kelly McNally","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2026.2735024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study characterizes patterns of non-credible cognitive performance, clinical presentations and functional outcomes, and multidisciplinary treatment response in youth with persisting symptoms after concussion. A retrospective analysis of demographic data, injury factors, symptom ratings, and functional outcomes was conducted in 136 patients (8-20 years-old; 64% female) presenting for multidisciplinary concussion care. Concussion mechanisms included sports, motor vehicle accidents, recreational activities, falls, assaults, and other mechanisms. Findings revealed approximately one-fourth of youth demonstrated non-credible cognitive performance. Compared to youth with credible cognitive performance, youth with non-credible cognitive performance were more likely to have premorbid attention or learning problems, non-credible neurologic exam findings, and significantly poorer cognitive performance across all tests apart from word reading. While youth with non-credible cognitive performance endorsed significantly more symptoms than those with credible cognitive performance at initial presentation and throughout the course of multidisciplinary treatment, their symptoms improved at a similar rate compared to those with credible cognitive performance. Additionally, groups did not differ significantly in school absences or parent-reported quality of life, despite higher self-reported symptom burden in the non-credible group. These findings suggest that youth with persisting symptoms who demonstrate non-credible cognitive performance similarly benefit from standard multidisciplinary concussion care, though they may continue to report higher symptoms throughout treatment. Additionally, youth with non-credible cognitive performance may also display non-credible findings on other aspects of multidisciplinary evaluations, highlighting the need for further research into individualized care models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of non-credible cognitive performance on multidisciplinary treatment outcomes in youth with persisting symptoms after concussion.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Diane May, Sean Rose, Cody Solesbee, Emily Divirgilio, Kathleen Shiplett, Ashley Davidson, Kelly McNally\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2026.2735024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study characterizes patterns of non-credible cognitive performance, clinical presentations and functional outcomes, and multidisciplinary treatment response in youth with persisting symptoms after concussion. A retrospective analysis of demographic data, injury factors, symptom ratings, and functional outcomes was conducted in 136 patients (8-20 years-old; 64% female) presenting for multidisciplinary concussion care. Concussion mechanisms included sports, motor vehicle accidents, recreational activities, falls, assaults, and other mechanisms. Findings revealed approximately one-fourth of youth demonstrated non-credible cognitive performance. Compared to youth with credible cognitive performance, youth with non-credible cognitive performance were more likely to have premorbid attention or learning problems, non-credible neurologic exam findings, and significantly poorer cognitive performance across all tests apart from word reading. While youth with non-credible cognitive performance endorsed significantly more symptoms than those with credible cognitive performance at initial presentation and throughout the course of multidisciplinary treatment, their symptoms improved at a similar rate compared to those with credible cognitive performance. Additionally, groups did not differ significantly in school absences or parent-reported quality of life, despite higher self-reported symptom burden in the non-credible group. These findings suggest that youth with persisting symptoms who demonstrate non-credible cognitive performance similarly benefit from standard multidisciplinary concussion care, though they may continue to report higher symptoms throughout treatment. Additionally, youth with non-credible cognitive performance may also display non-credible findings on other aspects of multidisciplinary evaluations, highlighting the need for further research into individualized care models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2735024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2735024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of non-credible cognitive performance on multidisciplinary treatment outcomes in youth with persisting symptoms after concussion.
This study characterizes patterns of non-credible cognitive performance, clinical presentations and functional outcomes, and multidisciplinary treatment response in youth with persisting symptoms after concussion. A retrospective analysis of demographic data, injury factors, symptom ratings, and functional outcomes was conducted in 136 patients (8-20 years-old; 64% female) presenting for multidisciplinary concussion care. Concussion mechanisms included sports, motor vehicle accidents, recreational activities, falls, assaults, and other mechanisms. Findings revealed approximately one-fourth of youth demonstrated non-credible cognitive performance. Compared to youth with credible cognitive performance, youth with non-credible cognitive performance were more likely to have premorbid attention or learning problems, non-credible neurologic exam findings, and significantly poorer cognitive performance across all tests apart from word reading. While youth with non-credible cognitive performance endorsed significantly more symptoms than those with credible cognitive performance at initial presentation and throughout the course of multidisciplinary treatment, their symptoms improved at a similar rate compared to those with credible cognitive performance. Additionally, groups did not differ significantly in school absences or parent-reported quality of life, despite higher self-reported symptom burden in the non-credible group. These findings suggest that youth with persisting symptoms who demonstrate non-credible cognitive performance similarly benefit from standard multidisciplinary concussion care, though they may continue to report higher symptoms throughout treatment. Additionally, youth with non-credible cognitive performance may also display non-credible findings on other aspects of multidisciplinary evaluations, highlighting the need for further research into individualized care models.
期刊介绍:
Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.