特殊学习障碍儿童的社会人口学危险因素和WISC-IV认知特征:一项病例对照研究

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tuba Karakuş Aslan, Ozan Emre Aslan, Özlem Yıldız Gündoğdu
{"title":"特殊学习障碍儿童的社会人口学危险因素和WISC-IV认知特征:一项病例对照研究","authors":"Tuba Karakuş Aslan, Ozan Emre Aslan, Özlem Yıldız Gündoğdu","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2026.2741699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Specific learning disorder (SLD) stems from genetic, environmental, and cognitive factors; however, their relative contributions and the diagnostic validity of cognitive measures remain unclear. This case-control study compared 35 children aged 8-12 diagnosed with SLD according to DSM-5-TR criteria with 35 healthy controls of comparable age and sex. Sociodemographic characteristics, developmental history, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV (WISC-IV) profiles were examined using t-tests, chi-square analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Firth-penalized logistic regression. Children with SLD scored significantly lower on all WISC-IV indices, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.84-1.39). These differences were maintained after adjusting for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Among the four factor indices, the Working Memory Index had the highest discriminatory power (AUC = 0.805). Four independent predictors-age at first sentence production, a family history of SLD, maternal education below college, and the absence of regular extracurricular activities-explained 78.0% of the variance and yielded an 88.6% classification accuracy. These findings indicate that genetic predisposition, environmental disadvantage, and early language delay converge in SLD risk and support working memory assessment as a clinically useful diagnostic indicator.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic risk factors and WISC-IV cognitive profile in children with specific learning disorder: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Tuba Karakuş Aslan, Ozan Emre Aslan, Özlem Yıldız Gündoğdu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2026.2741699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Specific learning disorder (SLD) stems from genetic, environmental, and cognitive factors; however, their relative contributions and the diagnostic validity of cognitive measures remain unclear. This case-control study compared 35 children aged 8-12 diagnosed with SLD according to DSM-5-TR criteria with 35 healthy controls of comparable age and sex. Sociodemographic characteristics, developmental history, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV (WISC-IV) profiles were examined using t-tests, chi-square analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Firth-penalized logistic regression. Children with SLD scored significantly lower on all WISC-IV indices, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.84-1.39). These differences were maintained after adjusting for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Among the four factor indices, the Working Memory Index had the highest discriminatory power (AUC = 0.805). Four independent predictors-age at first sentence production, a family history of SLD, maternal education below college, and the absence of regular extracurricular activities-explained 78.0% of the variance and yielded an 88.6% classification accuracy. These findings indicate that genetic predisposition, environmental disadvantage, and early language delay converge in SLD risk and support working memory assessment as a clinically useful diagnostic indicator.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2741699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2741699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特殊学习障碍(SLD)源于遗传、环境和认知因素;然而,他们的相对贡献和认知测量的诊断有效性仍然不清楚。本病例对照研究比较了35名根据DSM-5-TR标准诊断为SLD的8-12岁儿童与35名年龄和性别相当的健康对照。采用t检验、卡方分析、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和firth惩罚逻辑回归对社会人口学特征、发展史和韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC-IV)进行检验。SLD患儿在所有WISC-IV指标上得分均显著降低,效应量较大(Cohen’s d = 0.84-1.39)。在调整了年龄、性别和社会经济地位之后,这些差异仍然存在。在4个因素指标中,工作记忆指标具有最高的区分力(AUC = 0.805)。4个独立的预测因素——会说第一句话的年龄、SLD家族史、母亲教育程度低于大学、缺乏定期的课外活动——解释了78.0%的方差,并产生了88.6%的分类准确率。这些研究结果表明,遗传易感性、环境劣势和早期语言延迟在特殊语言障碍风险中有共同作用,并支持工作记忆评估作为临床有用的诊断指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociodemographic risk factors and WISC-IV cognitive profile in children with specific learning disorder: a case-control study.

Specific learning disorder (SLD) stems from genetic, environmental, and cognitive factors; however, their relative contributions and the diagnostic validity of cognitive measures remain unclear. This case-control study compared 35 children aged 8-12 diagnosed with SLD according to DSM-5-TR criteria with 35 healthy controls of comparable age and sex. Sociodemographic characteristics, developmental history, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV (WISC-IV) profiles were examined using t-tests, chi-square analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Firth-penalized logistic regression. Children with SLD scored significantly lower on all WISC-IV indices, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.84-1.39). These differences were maintained after adjusting for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Among the four factor indices, the Working Memory Index had the highest discriminatory power (AUC = 0.805). Four independent predictors-age at first sentence production, a family history of SLD, maternal education below college, and the absence of regular extracurricular activities-explained 78.0% of the variance and yielded an 88.6% classification accuracy. These findings indicate that genetic predisposition, environmental disadvantage, and early language delay converge in SLD risk and support working memory assessment as a clinically useful diagnostic indicator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书