双侧经颅直流电刺激对特殊学习障碍儿童认知灵活性的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Negin Kabirmokhtarfar, Elham Hakimirad, Zahra Aminabadi, Fatemeh Shahsanaei, Shirin Mojaver
{"title":"双侧经颅直流电刺激对特殊学习障碍儿童认知灵活性的影响。","authors":"Negin Kabirmokhtarfar, Elham Hakimirad, Zahra Aminabadi, Fatemeh Shahsanaei, Shirin Mojaver","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2026.2741106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with specific learning disorders (SLDs) often show impairments in cognitive flexibility, an essential component of executive functioning. This preliminary study examined the potential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive flexibility in children aged 7-12 years with SLDs. In a randomized, single-blind, pretest-posttest sham-controlled design, 26 participants were allocated to either an experimental group receiving ten sessions of active brain stimulation or a sham group. Stimulation targeted the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (anodal) and the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex (cathodal). Cognitive flexibility was evaluated using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, assessing strategic thinking, rule shifting, and error patterns. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analyses of covariance, supplemented by change-score sensitivity analyses. Active tDCS was associated with statistically significant improvement in selected measures of cognitive flexibility compared with sham stimulation, including Total Score, Clusters, and Perseverative Errors, whereas no reliable group difference was observed for Total Time. Although these findings suggest that dual-site prefrontal tDCS may be a potentially useful approach for further investigation in children with SLDs, conclusions are limited by the small sample size, sensitivity of the multivariate findings to covariate specification, and the absence of follow-up assessments to determine whether gains persist over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive flexibility in children with Specific Learning Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Negin Kabirmokhtarfar, Elham Hakimirad, Zahra Aminabadi, Fatemeh Shahsanaei, Shirin Mojaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2026.2741106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children with specific learning disorders (SLDs) often show impairments in cognitive flexibility, an essential component of executive functioning. This preliminary study examined the potential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive flexibility in children aged 7-12 years with SLDs. In a randomized, single-blind, pretest-posttest sham-controlled design, 26 participants were allocated to either an experimental group receiving ten sessions of active brain stimulation or a sham group. Stimulation targeted the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (anodal) and the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex (cathodal). Cognitive flexibility was evaluated using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, assessing strategic thinking, rule shifting, and error patterns. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analyses of covariance, supplemented by change-score sensitivity analyses. Active tDCS was associated with statistically significant improvement in selected measures of cognitive flexibility compared with sham stimulation, including Total Score, Clusters, and Perseverative Errors, whereas no reliable group difference was observed for Total Time. Although these findings suggest that dual-site prefrontal tDCS may be a potentially useful approach for further investigation in children with SLDs, conclusions are limited by the small sample size, sensitivity of the multivariate findings to covariate specification, and the absence of follow-up assessments to determine whether gains persist over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2741106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2026.2741106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有特殊学习障碍(SLDs)的儿童通常表现出认知灵活性的障碍,这是执行功能的重要组成部分。本初步研究探讨了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对7-12岁SLDs患儿认知灵活性的潜在影响。在一个随机、单盲、测试前-测试后的假对照设计中,26名参与者被分配到接受10次脑刺激的实验组和假组。刺激的目标是左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(阳极)和右侧腹内侧前额叶皮层(阴极)。认知灵活性评估使用威斯康辛卡片分类测试,评估战略思维,规则转移和错误模式。结果分析采用多变量和单变量协方差分析,辅以变化评分敏感性分析。与假刺激相比,活动tDCS与认知灵活性的选择测量有统计学意义的改善相关,包括总分、聚类和持续性错误,而总时间没有观察到可靠的组差异。尽管这些研究结果表明,双部位前额叶tDCS可能是一种潜在的有用方法,用于进一步研究特殊发育障碍儿童,但由于样本量小,多变量研究结果对协变量规范的敏感性,以及缺乏随访评估来确定获益是否持续,结论受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive flexibility in children with Specific Learning Disorders.

Children with specific learning disorders (SLDs) often show impairments in cognitive flexibility, an essential component of executive functioning. This preliminary study examined the potential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive flexibility in children aged 7-12 years with SLDs. In a randomized, single-blind, pretest-posttest sham-controlled design, 26 participants were allocated to either an experimental group receiving ten sessions of active brain stimulation or a sham group. Stimulation targeted the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (anodal) and the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex (cathodal). Cognitive flexibility was evaluated using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, assessing strategic thinking, rule shifting, and error patterns. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analyses of covariance, supplemented by change-score sensitivity analyses. Active tDCS was associated with statistically significant improvement in selected measures of cognitive flexibility compared with sham stimulation, including Total Score, Clusters, and Perseverative Errors, whereas no reliable group difference was observed for Total Time. Although these findings suggest that dual-site prefrontal tDCS may be a potentially useful approach for further investigation in children with SLDs, conclusions are limited by the small sample size, sensitivity of the multivariate findings to covariate specification, and the absence of follow-up assessments to determine whether gains persist over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书