葡甘露聚糖和抗性淀粉在肥胖管理中的作用:对饱腹感、肠道发酵、体重相关和代谢结果的系统回顾。

IF 6.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Food & Function Pub Date : 2026-10-19 DOI:10.1039/d6fo03061k
Refani Alycia Kusuma, Irwan Budiono, Idelia Akmaliyyah Natasyaesa, Zahra Darin Fatina, Syifa Fauzia Putri, Nabiilah Sya'baniyah, Indriana Ari Susanti
{"title":"葡甘露聚糖和抗性淀粉在肥胖管理中的作用:对饱腹感、肠道发酵、体重相关和代谢结果的系统回顾。","authors":"Refani Alycia Kusuma, Irwan Budiono, Idelia Akmaliyyah Natasyaesa, Zahra Darin Fatina, Syifa Fauzia Putri, Nabiilah Sya'baniyah, Indriana Ari Susanti","doi":"10.1039/d6fo03061k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is a growing global health challenge associated with dysregulated appetite, impaired gut function, and metabolic disorders. Glucomannan and resistant starch are functional dietary fibers that may influence obesity-related pathways through distinct but interconnected mechanisms. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding their effects on satiety and appetite regulation, gut fermentation and microbiota-related pathways, and weight-related and metabolic outcomes. A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was conducted without publication-date restrictions, with the final search performed on 25 August 2026. Eligible randomized and crossover trials, non-randomized intervention studies, and animal studies investigating glucomannan, resistant starch, or relevant formulations were included when they reported predefined obesity-related outcomes. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising six randomized or crossover trials, three non-randomized intervention studies, and eleven animal studies. Several studies reported improvements in satiety, hunger, food or energy intake, body weight, adiposity, or metabolic outcomes, although findings were heterogeneous across interventions, populations, and study designs. Glucomannan-containing interventions were generally associated with viscosity-related satiety effects, whereas resistant starch was more frequently associated with gut fermentation, microbiota modulation, and short-chain fatty acid production. Mechanistic and metabolic evidence was predominantly derived from animal studies, and several human studies reported null findings. Overall, the findings suggest potential complementarity between glucomannan and resistant starch at the mechanistic level, but direct evidence supporting synergistic effects of their combined use remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" ","pages":"8941-8965"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucomannan and resistant starch in obesity management: a systematic review of satiety, gut fermentation, and weight-related and metabolic outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Refani Alycia Kusuma, Irwan Budiono, Idelia Akmaliyyah Natasyaesa, Zahra Darin Fatina, Syifa Fauzia Putri, Nabiilah Sya'baniyah, Indriana Ari Susanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d6fo03061k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obesity is a growing global health challenge associated with dysregulated appetite, impaired gut function, and metabolic disorders. Glucomannan and resistant starch are functional dietary fibers that may influence obesity-related pathways through distinct but interconnected mechanisms. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding their effects on satiety and appetite regulation, gut fermentation and microbiota-related pathways, and weight-related and metabolic outcomes. A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was conducted without publication-date restrictions, with the final search performed on 25 August 2026. Eligible randomized and crossover trials, non-randomized intervention studies, and animal studies investigating glucomannan, resistant starch, or relevant formulations were included when they reported predefined obesity-related outcomes. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising six randomized or crossover trials, three non-randomized intervention studies, and eleven animal studies. Several studies reported improvements in satiety, hunger, food or energy intake, body weight, adiposity, or metabolic outcomes, although findings were heterogeneous across interventions, populations, and study designs. Glucomannan-containing interventions were generally associated with viscosity-related satiety effects, whereas resistant starch was more frequently associated with gut fermentation, microbiota modulation, and short-chain fatty acid production. Mechanistic and metabolic evidence was predominantly derived from animal studies, and several human studies reported null findings. Overall, the findings suggest potential complementarity between glucomannan and resistant starch at the mechanistic level, but direct evidence supporting synergistic effects of their combined use remains limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food & Function\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8941-8965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food & Function\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6fo03061k\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6fo03061k","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖是一个日益严重的全球健康挑战,与食欲失调、肠道功能受损和代谢紊乱有关。葡甘露聚糖和抗性淀粉是功能性膳食纤维,它们可能通过不同但相互关联的机制影响肥胖相关途径。本系统综述旨在综合目前关于它们对饱腹感和食欲调节、肠道发酵和微生物群相关途径、体重相关和代谢结果的影响的证据。系统检索Scopus、PubMed/MEDLINE、ScienceDirect和Cochrane图书馆,不受出版日期限制,最终检索于2026年8月25日进行。研究葡甘露聚糖、抗性淀粉或相关配方的符合条件的随机和交叉试验、非随机干预研究和动物研究在报告预定的肥胖相关结果时被纳入。20项研究符合纳入标准,包括6项随机或交叉试验,3项非随机干预研究和11项动物研究。一些研究报告了饱腹感、饥饿感、食物或能量摄入、体重、肥胖或代谢结果的改善,尽管在干预、人群和研究设计中发现的结果是不一样的。含有葡甘露聚糖的干预通常与粘度相关的饱腹感效应有关,而抗性淀粉更经常与肠道发酵、微生物群调节和短链脂肪酸产生有关。机制和代谢证据主要来自动物研究,一些人类研究报告无发现。总的来说,研究结果表明葡甘露聚糖和抗性淀粉在机制水平上具有潜在的互补性,但支持两者联合使用的协同效应的直接证据仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glucomannan and resistant starch in obesity management: a systematic review of satiety, gut fermentation, and weight-related and metabolic outcomes.

Obesity is a growing global health challenge associated with dysregulated appetite, impaired gut function, and metabolic disorders. Glucomannan and resistant starch are functional dietary fibers that may influence obesity-related pathways through distinct but interconnected mechanisms. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding their effects on satiety and appetite regulation, gut fermentation and microbiota-related pathways, and weight-related and metabolic outcomes. A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was conducted without publication-date restrictions, with the final search performed on 25 August 2026. Eligible randomized and crossover trials, non-randomized intervention studies, and animal studies investigating glucomannan, resistant starch, or relevant formulations were included when they reported predefined obesity-related outcomes. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising six randomized or crossover trials, three non-randomized intervention studies, and eleven animal studies. Several studies reported improvements in satiety, hunger, food or energy intake, body weight, adiposity, or metabolic outcomes, although findings were heterogeneous across interventions, populations, and study designs. Glucomannan-containing interventions were generally associated with viscosity-related satiety effects, whereas resistant starch was more frequently associated with gut fermentation, microbiota modulation, and short-chain fatty acid production. Mechanistic and metabolic evidence was predominantly derived from animal studies, and several human studies reported null findings. Overall, the findings suggest potential complementarity between glucomannan and resistant starch at the mechanistic level, but direct evidence supporting synergistic effects of their combined use remains limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food & Function
Food & Function BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
957
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书