COVID-19大流行期间国家政策的变化和紧急租赁援助的接受。

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES
Vincent A Fusaro, Christopher Baidoo, K Megan Collier, Naoka Carey, Rebekah Levine Coley
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间国家政策的变化和紧急租赁援助的接受。","authors":"Vincent A Fusaro, Christopher Baidoo, K Megan Collier, Naoka Carey, Rebekah Levine Coley","doi":"10.1080/07352166.2026.2678884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic threatened to exacerbate an existing U.S. rental housing affordability crisis. In response, the federal government implemented the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, transferring nearly $47 billion to state and local governments to provide financial assistance to vulnerable renter households. Programs varied on several dimensions, including in novel policies such as use of self-attestation and proxies in lieu of documentation in applications. We merge household microdata from the Household Pulse Survey with data on state-level ERA programs to examine the relationship between policy variation and take-up of assistance. Using sequential logit models, we consider receipt as a series of stages (application, decision, receipt). Policies aimed at reducing administrative burdens and policies prioritizing specific groups were associated with increased likelihood of applications for and receipt of assistance, especially for the lowest-income households. Findings aid in understanding the unique policy regime of the pandemic and identify promising practices for post-pandemic assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13506125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Policy Variation & Emergency Rental Assistance Take-up during the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent A Fusaro, Christopher Baidoo, K Megan Collier, Naoka Carey, Rebekah Levine Coley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07352166.2026.2678884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic threatened to exacerbate an existing U.S. rental housing affordability crisis. In response, the federal government implemented the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, transferring nearly $47 billion to state and local governments to provide financial assistance to vulnerable renter households. Programs varied on several dimensions, including in novel policies such as use of self-attestation and proxies in lieu of documentation in applications. We merge household microdata from the Household Pulse Survey with data on state-level ERA programs to examine the relationship between policy variation and take-up of assistance. Using sequential logit models, we consider receipt as a series of stages (application, decision, receipt). Policies aimed at reducing administrative burdens and policies prioritizing specific groups were associated with increased likelihood of applications for and receipt of assistance, especially for the lowest-income households. Findings aid in understanding the unique policy regime of the pandemic and identify promising practices for post-pandemic assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Affairs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13506125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2026.2678884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2026.2678884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情有可能加剧美国现有的租房负担能力危机。为此,联邦政府实施了紧急租房援助计划(Emergency Rental Assistance Program),向州和地方政府拨款近470亿美元,为弱势租房家庭提供财政援助。程序在几个方面有所不同,包括使用自我认证和代理来代替应用程序中的文档等新策略。我们将来自《家庭脉动调查》的家庭微观数据与州级补贴计划的数据合并,以检验政策变化与接受援助之间的关系。使用顺序logit模型,我们将接收视为一系列阶段(申请、决策、接收)。旨在减轻行政负担的政策和优先考虑特定群体的政策与申请和接受援助的可能性增加有关,特别是对最低收入家庭而言。调查结果有助于了解大流行病的独特政策制度,并确定大流行病后援助的有希望的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Policy Variation & Emergency Rental Assistance Take-up during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic threatened to exacerbate an existing U.S. rental housing affordability crisis. In response, the federal government implemented the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, transferring nearly $47 billion to state and local governments to provide financial assistance to vulnerable renter households. Programs varied on several dimensions, including in novel policies such as use of self-attestation and proxies in lieu of documentation in applications. We merge household microdata from the Household Pulse Survey with data on state-level ERA programs to examine the relationship between policy variation and take-up of assistance. Using sequential logit models, we consider receipt as a series of stages (application, decision, receipt). Policies aimed at reducing administrative burdens and policies prioritizing specific groups were associated with increased likelihood of applications for and receipt of assistance, especially for the lowest-income households. Findings aid in understanding the unique policy regime of the pandemic and identify promising practices for post-pandemic assistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Affairs
Journal of Urban Affairs URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Focusing on urban research and policy analysis, the Journal of Urban Affairs is among the most widely cited journals in the field. Published for the Urban Affairs Association, the journal offers multidisciplinary perspectives and explores issues of relevance to both scholars and practitioners, including: - Theoretical, conceptual, or methodological approaches to metropolitan and community problems - Empirical research that advances the understanding of society - Strategies for social change in the urban milieu - Innovative urban policies and programs - Issues of current interest to those who work in the field and those who study the urban and regional environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书