青少年早期受害、内化问题和反社会行为之间中介通路的人内测试。

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1007/s10964-026-02407-9
Sonja E Siennick, Jillian J Turanovic
{"title":"青少年早期受害、内化问题和反社会行为之间中介通路的人内测试。","authors":"Sonja E Siennick, Jillian J Turanovic","doi":"10.1007/s10964-026-02407-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different theoretical models propose different orderings of victimization and internalizing problems in forming mediated pathways to antisocial behavior. The strain or stress model proposes that victimization triggers internalizing problems which in turn lead to antisocial outcomes; in contrast, the symptoms-driven model proposes that internalizing problems trigger victimization which then leads to antisocial outcomes. There have been few rigorous tests of these pathways, and it is unclear whether they differ for different antisocial outcomes (i.e., aggression versus general rule violation). The models were tested using within-person regression and five waves of survey data from 300 early adolescents. At baseline the adolescents had a mean age of 11.28 (SD = 0.50); 50% were female. Although victimization increased internalizing problems, those problems decreased rather than increased antisocial behavior; this did not support the strain model. Victimization positively predicted antisocial behavior, but the association was significant only for rule violation. In addition, victimization was not preceded by internalizing problems; this did not support the symptoms-driven model. The results support the value of within-person designs and the need to reconsider the role internalizing problems play in the development of antisocial behavior in early adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"2544-2559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Within-Person Test of Mediated Pathways between Victimization, Internalizing Problems, and Antisocial Behavior in Early Adolescence.\",\"authors\":\"Sonja E Siennick, Jillian J Turanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10964-026-02407-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Different theoretical models propose different orderings of victimization and internalizing problems in forming mediated pathways to antisocial behavior. The strain or stress model proposes that victimization triggers internalizing problems which in turn lead to antisocial outcomes; in contrast, the symptoms-driven model proposes that internalizing problems trigger victimization which then leads to antisocial outcomes. There have been few rigorous tests of these pathways, and it is unclear whether they differ for different antisocial outcomes (i.e., aggression versus general rule violation). The models were tested using within-person regression and five waves of survey data from 300 early adolescents. At baseline the adolescents had a mean age of 11.28 (SD = 0.50); 50% were female. Although victimization increased internalizing problems, those problems decreased rather than increased antisocial behavior; this did not support the strain model. Victimization positively predicted antisocial behavior, but the association was significant only for rule violation. In addition, victimization was not preceded by internalizing problems; this did not support the symptoms-driven model. The results support the value of within-person designs and the need to reconsider the role internalizing problems play in the development of antisocial behavior in early adolescence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Youth and Adolescence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2544-2559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Youth and Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02407-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-026-02407-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同的理论模型在形成反社会行为的中介途径中提出了不同的受害和内化问题的顺序。紧张或压力模型提出,受害会引发内化问题,从而导致反社会结果;相比之下,症状驱动模型提出,内化问题引发受害,然后导致反社会的结果。对这些途径的严格测试很少,也不清楚它们对不同的反社会结果(即,攻击与一般规则违反)是否有所不同。这些模型使用人内回归和来自300名早期青少年的五波调查数据进行了测试。在基线时,青少年平均年龄为11.28岁(SD = 0.50);50%是女性。虽然受害增加了内化问题,但这些问题减少而不是增加了反社会行为;这并不支持应变模型。受害对反社会行为有正向的预测作用,但只对违反规则有显著的相关性。此外,受害之前没有将问题内在化;这并不支持症状驱动模型。本研究结果支持了个人内部设计的价值,以及重新考虑内化问题在青少年早期反社会行为发展中的作用的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Within-Person Test of Mediated Pathways between Victimization, Internalizing Problems, and Antisocial Behavior in Early Adolescence.

Different theoretical models propose different orderings of victimization and internalizing problems in forming mediated pathways to antisocial behavior. The strain or stress model proposes that victimization triggers internalizing problems which in turn lead to antisocial outcomes; in contrast, the symptoms-driven model proposes that internalizing problems trigger victimization which then leads to antisocial outcomes. There have been few rigorous tests of these pathways, and it is unclear whether they differ for different antisocial outcomes (i.e., aggression versus general rule violation). The models were tested using within-person regression and five waves of survey data from 300 early adolescents. At baseline the adolescents had a mean age of 11.28 (SD = 0.50); 50% were female. Although victimization increased internalizing problems, those problems decreased rather than increased antisocial behavior; this did not support the strain model. Victimization positively predicted antisocial behavior, but the association was significant only for rule violation. In addition, victimization was not preceded by internalizing problems; this did not support the symptoms-driven model. The results support the value of within-person designs and the need to reconsider the role internalizing problems play in the development of antisocial behavior in early adolescence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书