当产品短缺产生反作用(或没有)时:有限的数量会影响在线促销中零售商的诚意

IF 8.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2025.11.001
Yufang Jin, Guang-Xin Xie, Jurui Zhang
{"title":"当产品短缺产生反作用(或没有)时:有限的数量会影响在线促销中零售商的诚意","authors":"Yufang Jin,&nbsp;Guang-Xin Xie,&nbsp;Jurui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2025.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limited quantity is prevalent in online promotions, where retailers set predetermined amounts of in-stock items to boost short-term sales through perceived scarcity. While prior studies suggest that demand-driven scarcity can elicit positive product evaluations, this research examines potential adverse effects of supply-driven scarcity on consumer perceptions of retailers, stemming from the granularity of limited quantities that deviate from consumer expectations. Four experiments and one field study demonstrate that less- (vs. more-) than-expected limited quantities undermine perceived retailer sincerity and, in turn, reduce purchase likelihood. This research contributes to the scarcity literature by revealing a novel <em>scarce-insincere inference</em>, an inferential leap beyond consumer product evaluations triggered by expectation disconfirmation. Two practical remedies are identified for retailers to mitigate these adverse effects: offering timely availability guarantees and employing external attribution framing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"102 2","pages":"Pages 297-314"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When product scarcity backfires (or doesn’t): Limited quantities affect perceived retailer sincerity in online promotions\",\"authors\":\"Yufang Jin,&nbsp;Guang-Xin Xie,&nbsp;Jurui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretai.2025.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Limited quantity is prevalent in online promotions, where retailers set predetermined amounts of in-stock items to boost short-term sales through perceived scarcity. While prior studies suggest that demand-driven scarcity can elicit positive product evaluations, this research examines potential adverse effects of supply-driven scarcity on consumer perceptions of retailers, stemming from the granularity of limited quantities that deviate from consumer expectations. Four experiments and one field study demonstrate that less- (vs. more-) than-expected limited quantities undermine perceived retailer sincerity and, in turn, reduce purchase likelihood. This research contributes to the scarcity literature by revealing a novel <em>scarce-insincere inference</em>, an inferential leap beyond consumer product evaluations triggered by expectation disconfirmation. Two practical remedies are identified for retailers to mitigate these adverse effects: offering timely availability guarantees and employing external attribution framing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing\",\"volume\":\"102 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 297-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925001022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925001022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

限量在网上促销中很普遍,零售商设定预定数量的库存商品,通过感知稀缺来提振短期销售。虽然先前的研究表明,需求驱动的稀缺性可以引发积极的产品评价,但本研究考察了供应驱动的稀缺性对消费者对零售商的看法的潜在不利影响,这种影响源于偏离消费者预期的有限数量的粒度。四项实验和一项实地研究表明,低于(相对于高于)预期的有限数量会破坏零售商的诚意,进而降低购买可能性。本研究通过揭示一种新颖的“稀缺-不真诚”推理,对稀缺文献做出了贡献,这种推理超越了由期望不确认引发的消费者产品评价。为零售商确定了两种实际的补救措施来减轻这些不利影响:提供及时的可用性保证和采用外部归因框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When product scarcity backfires (or doesn’t): Limited quantities affect perceived retailer sincerity in online promotions
Limited quantity is prevalent in online promotions, where retailers set predetermined amounts of in-stock items to boost short-term sales through perceived scarcity. While prior studies suggest that demand-driven scarcity can elicit positive product evaluations, this research examines potential adverse effects of supply-driven scarcity on consumer perceptions of retailers, stemming from the granularity of limited quantities that deviate from consumer expectations. Four experiments and one field study demonstrate that less- (vs. more-) than-expected limited quantities undermine perceived retailer sincerity and, in turn, reduce purchase likelihood. This research contributes to the scarcity literature by revealing a novel scarce-insincere inference, an inferential leap beyond consumer product evaluations triggered by expectation disconfirmation. Two practical remedies are identified for retailers to mitigate these adverse effects: offering timely availability guarantees and employing external attribution framing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书