{"title":"老年人参加体育活动的结果对卫生保健专业人员很重要。","authors":"Peter J Young, Dawn C Mackey","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igag020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There is extensive heterogeneity in outcome domain selection and reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity interventions for older adults. Physical activity researchers need a core outcome set that recommends a minimum set of outcome domains to measure consistently, guided by input from health care professionals to ensure clinical relevance. This study aimed to identify the outcome domains related to older adults' physical activity participation that are most important to health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Health care professionals completed an online survey in which they rated the importance of measuring 24 candidate outcome domains in future RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults and ranked their top four.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>225 health care professionals participated (72% female; mean [SD] age, 37.8 [11.2] years; 21 general practitioners, 99 physiotherapists, and 105 kinesiologists). The 5 outcome domains most frequently rated as \"highly important\" (6-7 of 7) were Falls (92.0%), Quality of Life (91.5%), Independence (87.9%), Balance (84.4%), and Mobility (82.7%). The 5 outcome domains that most frequently appeared in participants' top 4 importance rankings were Quality of Life (67.1%), Independence (50.2%), Risk and Management of Chronic Disease (40.2%), Mobility (33.3%), and Falls (32.9%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Health care professionals prioritized Quality of Life, Independence, Falls, and Mobility as key outcome domains to measure in RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults. These results will help align research with clinical priorities, support physical activity promotion, and guide the development of a core outcome set.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 5","pages":"igag020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13082369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of older adult physical activity participation that matter to health care professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Peter J Young, Dawn C Mackey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igag020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There is extensive heterogeneity in outcome domain selection and reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity interventions for older adults. Physical activity researchers need a core outcome set that recommends a minimum set of outcome domains to measure consistently, guided by input from health care professionals to ensure clinical relevance. This study aimed to identify the outcome domains related to older adults' physical activity participation that are most important to health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Health care professionals completed an online survey in which they rated the importance of measuring 24 candidate outcome domains in future RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults and ranked their top four.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>225 health care professionals participated (72% female; mean [SD] age, 37.8 [11.2] years; 21 general practitioners, 99 physiotherapists, and 105 kinesiologists). The 5 outcome domains most frequently rated as \\\"highly important\\\" (6-7 of 7) were Falls (92.0%), Quality of Life (91.5%), Independence (87.9%), Balance (84.4%), and Mobility (82.7%). The 5 outcome domains that most frequently appeared in participants' top 4 importance rankings were Quality of Life (67.1%), Independence (50.2%), Risk and Management of Chronic Disease (40.2%), Mobility (33.3%), and Falls (32.9%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Health care professionals prioritized Quality of Life, Independence, Falls, and Mobility as key outcome domains to measure in RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults. These results will help align research with clinical priorities, support physical activity promotion, and guide the development of a core outcome set.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"igag020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13082369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of older adult physical activity participation that matter to health care professionals.
Background and objectives: There is extensive heterogeneity in outcome domain selection and reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity interventions for older adults. Physical activity researchers need a core outcome set that recommends a minimum set of outcome domains to measure consistently, guided by input from health care professionals to ensure clinical relevance. This study aimed to identify the outcome domains related to older adults' physical activity participation that are most important to health care professionals.
Research design and methods: Health care professionals completed an online survey in which they rated the importance of measuring 24 candidate outcome domains in future RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults and ranked their top four.
Results: 225 health care professionals participated (72% female; mean [SD] age, 37.8 [11.2] years; 21 general practitioners, 99 physiotherapists, and 105 kinesiologists). The 5 outcome domains most frequently rated as "highly important" (6-7 of 7) were Falls (92.0%), Quality of Life (91.5%), Independence (87.9%), Balance (84.4%), and Mobility (82.7%). The 5 outcome domains that most frequently appeared in participants' top 4 importance rankings were Quality of Life (67.1%), Independence (50.2%), Risk and Management of Chronic Disease (40.2%), Mobility (33.3%), and Falls (32.9%).
Discussion and implications: Health care professionals prioritized Quality of Life, Independence, Falls, and Mobility as key outcome domains to measure in RCTs of physical activity interventions for older adults. These results will help align research with clinical priorities, support physical activity promotion, and guide the development of a core outcome set.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.