成人神经胶质瘤患者清醒手术后的神经心理学结果:一项系统综述。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npaf075
Laura Amores-Carrera, Isabel Martín-Monzón
{"title":"成人神经胶质瘤患者清醒手术后的神经心理学结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Laura Amores-Carrera, Isabel Martín-Monzón","doi":"10.1093/nop/npaf075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Awake craniotomy is essential for glioma resection in functionally integrated brain regions, allowing real-time monitoring to reduce cognitive and emotional deficits. Although widely used, its long-term neuropsychological effects remain debated. This systematic review aims to investigate cognitive and emotional outcomes after awake brain surgery and the factors that influence recovery, including extent of resection, follow-up timing, and neural plasticity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review analyzes 34 studies on pre- and postoperative functional outcomes in glioma patients undergoing awake surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected with adult glioma patients (WHO grade I-IV) who had neuropsychological assessments before and after surgery. Data on preoperative cognitive profiles, recovery trajectories, and follow-up durations were examined, focusing on methodological consistency and assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated substantial variability in functional outcomes, with many patients recovering within 3 to 6 months post-surgery, while others experienced persistent deficits. Functional recovery was influenced not only by the extent of tumor resection but also by network-level reorganization. Methodological inconsistencies in neuropsychological assessments highlighted the need for standardized, personalized evaluation protocols, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive functional assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review emphasizes the shift from a localized cortical approach to a dynamic, network-based view of cognitive and emotional recovery. It calls for standardized, personalized neuropsychological assessments to optimize rehabilitation, along with extended follow-ups, and multidisciplinary care for long-term quality of life. Future research should refine assessment methods and strategies to better understand neuroplasticity and improve clinical outcomes in neuro-oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"23-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological outcomes following awake surgery in adult glioma patients: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Amores-Carrera, Isabel Martín-Monzón\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npaf075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Awake craniotomy is essential for glioma resection in functionally integrated brain regions, allowing real-time monitoring to reduce cognitive and emotional deficits. Although widely used, its long-term neuropsychological effects remain debated. This systematic review aims to investigate cognitive and emotional outcomes after awake brain surgery and the factors that influence recovery, including extent of resection, follow-up timing, and neural plasticity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review analyzes 34 studies on pre- and postoperative functional outcomes in glioma patients undergoing awake surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected with adult glioma patients (WHO grade I-IV) who had neuropsychological assessments before and after surgery. Data on preoperative cognitive profiles, recovery trajectories, and follow-up durations were examined, focusing on methodological consistency and assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated substantial variability in functional outcomes, with many patients recovering within 3 to 6 months post-surgery, while others experienced persistent deficits. Functional recovery was influenced not only by the extent of tumor resection but also by network-level reorganization. Methodological inconsistencies in neuropsychological assessments highlighted the need for standardized, personalized evaluation protocols, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive functional assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review emphasizes the shift from a localized cortical approach to a dynamic, network-based view of cognitive and emotional recovery. It calls for standardized, personalized neuropsychological assessments to optimize rehabilitation, along with extended follow-ups, and multidisciplinary care for long-term quality of life. Future research should refine assessment methods and strategies to better understand neuroplasticity and improve clinical outcomes in neuro-oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"23-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965649/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:清醒开颅术对于脑功能整合区域的胶质瘤切除术是必不可少的,允许实时监测减少认知和情绪缺陷。尽管被广泛使用,但其长期的神经心理影响仍存在争议。本系统综述旨在探讨清醒脑外科手术后的认知和情绪结果以及影响恢复的因素,包括切除程度、随访时间和神经可塑性。方法:本系统综述分析了34项关于神经胶质瘤患者接受清醒手术前后功能结局的研究。遵循PRISMA指南,研究对象为成年胶质瘤患者(WHO分级I-IV级),这些患者在手术前后进行了神经心理学评估。检查术前认知概况、恢复轨迹和随访时间的数据,重点关注方法一致性和评估工具。结果:研究结果显示功能结果存在很大差异,许多患者在术后3至6个月内恢复,而另一些患者则出现持续的功能缺陷。功能恢复不仅受肿瘤切除程度的影响,还受网络级重组的影响。神经心理学评估方法上的不一致突出了标准化、个性化评估方案的必要性,强调了综合功能评估的重要性。结论:这篇综述强调了认知和情绪恢复从局部皮质方法到动态的、基于网络的观点的转变。它要求标准化、个性化的神经心理学评估,以优化康复,同时延长随访时间,并提供多学科护理,以提高长期生活质量。未来的研究应完善评估方法和策略,以更好地了解神经可塑性和改善神经肿瘤学的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neuropsychological outcomes following awake surgery in adult glioma patients: A systematic review.

Neuropsychological outcomes following awake surgery in adult glioma patients: A systematic review.

Background: Awake craniotomy is essential for glioma resection in functionally integrated brain regions, allowing real-time monitoring to reduce cognitive and emotional deficits. Although widely used, its long-term neuropsychological effects remain debated. This systematic review aims to investigate cognitive and emotional outcomes after awake brain surgery and the factors that influence recovery, including extent of resection, follow-up timing, and neural plasticity.

Methods: This systematic review analyzes 34 studies on pre- and postoperative functional outcomes in glioma patients undergoing awake surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected with adult glioma patients (WHO grade I-IV) who had neuropsychological assessments before and after surgery. Data on preoperative cognitive profiles, recovery trajectories, and follow-up durations were examined, focusing on methodological consistency and assessment tools.

Results: The findings demonstrated substantial variability in functional outcomes, with many patients recovering within 3 to 6 months post-surgery, while others experienced persistent deficits. Functional recovery was influenced not only by the extent of tumor resection but also by network-level reorganization. Methodological inconsistencies in neuropsychological assessments highlighted the need for standardized, personalized evaluation protocols, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive functional assessments.

Conclusions: This review emphasizes the shift from a localized cortical approach to a dynamic, network-based view of cognitive and emotional recovery. It calls for standardized, personalized neuropsychological assessments to optimize rehabilitation, along with extended follow-ups, and multidisciplinary care for long-term quality of life. Future research should refine assessment methods and strategies to better understand neuroplasticity and improve clinical outcomes in neuro-oncology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书