{"title":"长期护理机构居民的护理协调与社会探视的预测因素。","authors":"Caroline Collins-Pisano, Rachel Weiskittle","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most studies to date have assessed visitation between family and residents via the overall frequency of in-person visits. This approach fails to account for 2 different types of involvement included in visitation: care coordination and social visitation. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers of care coordination distinct from social visitation with a specific focus on long-term care (LTC) site characteristics and resident functionality.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>One hundred and seventy-five adult participants in the United States with a close friend or relative residing in a LTC facility completed an online survey regarding their care coordination and social visitation in LTC facilities, LTC facility characteristics, and residents' functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shorter travel time and visitors' experiences communicating with the resident (e.g., comfort, frustration) emerged as the strongest predictors of both care coordination involvement and social visitation. Both greater comfort communicating with the resident and greater frustration predicted greater care coordination involvement, whereas only comfort communicating with the resident predicted social visitation. Resident length of stay, type of LTC facility, and resident communication factors (e.g., verbal abilities, recognition of visitors) were not significant predictors of care coordination involvement nor social visitation.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Logistical barriers and visitors' emotional experiences when communicating with residents may have a stronger influence on visitor engagement compared to resident's functional abilities and LTC facility characteristics. Interventions targeting the identified facilitators of visitation may help to facilitate and support family involvement with residents of LTC facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 3","pages":"igaf125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of care coordination versus social visitation with long-term care facility residents.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Collins-Pisano, Rachel Weiskittle\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most studies to date have assessed visitation between family and residents via the overall frequency of in-person visits. This approach fails to account for 2 different types of involvement included in visitation: care coordination and social visitation. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers of care coordination distinct from social visitation with a specific focus on long-term care (LTC) site characteristics and resident functionality.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>One hundred and seventy-five adult participants in the United States with a close friend or relative residing in a LTC facility completed an online survey regarding their care coordination and social visitation in LTC facilities, LTC facility characteristics, and residents' functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shorter travel time and visitors' experiences communicating with the resident (e.g., comfort, frustration) emerged as the strongest predictors of both care coordination involvement and social visitation. Both greater comfort communicating with the resident and greater frustration predicted greater care coordination involvement, whereas only comfort communicating with the resident predicted social visitation. Resident length of stay, type of LTC facility, and resident communication factors (e.g., verbal abilities, recognition of visitors) were not significant predictors of care coordination involvement nor social visitation.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Logistical barriers and visitors' emotional experiences when communicating with residents may have a stronger influence on visitor engagement compared to resident's functional abilities and LTC facility characteristics. Interventions targeting the identified facilitators of visitation may help to facilitate and support family involvement with residents of LTC facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"igaf125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf125\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of care coordination versus social visitation with long-term care facility residents.
Background and objectives: Most studies to date have assessed visitation between family and residents via the overall frequency of in-person visits. This approach fails to account for 2 different types of involvement included in visitation: care coordination and social visitation. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers of care coordination distinct from social visitation with a specific focus on long-term care (LTC) site characteristics and resident functionality.
Research design and methods: One hundred and seventy-five adult participants in the United States with a close friend or relative residing in a LTC facility completed an online survey regarding their care coordination and social visitation in LTC facilities, LTC facility characteristics, and residents' functionality.
Results: Shorter travel time and visitors' experiences communicating with the resident (e.g., comfort, frustration) emerged as the strongest predictors of both care coordination involvement and social visitation. Both greater comfort communicating with the resident and greater frustration predicted greater care coordination involvement, whereas only comfort communicating with the resident predicted social visitation. Resident length of stay, type of LTC facility, and resident communication factors (e.g., verbal abilities, recognition of visitors) were not significant predictors of care coordination involvement nor social visitation.
Discussion and implications: Logistical barriers and visitors' emotional experiences when communicating with residents may have a stronger influence on visitor engagement compared to resident's functional abilities and LTC facility characteristics. Interventions targeting the identified facilitators of visitation may help to facilitate and support family involvement with residents of LTC facilities.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.