执行功能应该包括在阅读理解模型中吗?如果是,应该包括哪些方面?

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Child Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1080/09297049.2026.2636210
Zsofia Imre, Michelle Y Kibby
{"title":"执行功能应该包括在阅读理解模型中吗?如果是,应该包括哪些方面?","authors":"Zsofia Imre, Michelle Y Kibby","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2026.2636210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"Simple View of Reading\" model postulates that reading comprehension (RC) is based on two component skills: basic reading ability and language comprehension. However, others suggest that various aspects of executive functioning (EF) contribute to RC. Thus, we examined EF in a comprehensive fashion to determine which aspects predict RC and to challenge the Simple View of Reading. Although numerous studies have examined working memory as a contributor to RC, and several have examined other specific aspects of EF, ours may be the first to assess multiple aspects of EF as predictors while controlling both basic reading and listening comprehension. Participants included a mixed sample of 250 children, aged 8-12 years. Multiple hierarchical regression was used to predict RC, with working memory, shifting, inhibition, problem-solving, planning, and nonverbal fluency being the independent variables, controlling basic reading, listening comprehension, and IQ. Results indicated that working memory, problem-solving, and nonverbal fluency predicted RC. As we used a cloze RC task, one likely needs WM to hold the passage in mind, and problem-solving and fluency/divergent thinking to derive the best word to complete the passage. In addition, our data support a multifaceted RC paradigm that includes EF over the Simple View of Reading.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1003-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Formula: see text] Should executive functioning be included in models of reading comprehension, and if so, which aspects?\",\"authors\":\"Zsofia Imre, Michelle Y Kibby\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09297049.2026.2636210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The \\\"Simple View of Reading\\\" model postulates that reading comprehension (RC) is based on two component skills: basic reading ability and language comprehension. However, others suggest that various aspects of executive functioning (EF) contribute to RC. Thus, we examined EF in a comprehensive fashion to determine which aspects predict RC and to challenge the Simple View of Reading. Although numerous studies have examined working memory as a contributor to RC, and several have examined other specific aspects of EF, ours may be the first to assess multiple aspects of EF as predictors while controlling both basic reading and listening comprehension. Participants included a mixed sample of 250 children, aged 8-12 years. Multiple hierarchical regression was used to predict RC, with working memory, shifting, inhibition, problem-solving, planning, and nonverbal fluency being the independent variables, controlling basic reading, listening comprehension, and IQ. Results indicated that working memory, problem-solving, and nonverbal fluency predicted RC. As we used a cloze RC task, one likely needs WM to hold the passage in mind, and problem-solving and fluency/divergent thinking to derive the best word to complete the passage. In addition, our data support a multifaceted RC paradigm that includes EF over the Simple View of Reading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1003-1018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2026.2636210\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2026.2636210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“简单阅读观”模式认为,阅读理解是由基本阅读能力和语言理解能力两部分组成的。然而,其他人认为执行功能(EF)的各个方面有助于RC。因此,我们以一种全面的方式研究了英语阅读,以确定哪些方面可以预测RC,并挑战简单阅读观。虽然有许多研究已经考察了工作记忆对语言学习的影响,也有一些研究了英语学习的其他具体方面,但我们的研究可能是第一个在控制基本阅读和听力理解的同时,将英语学习的多个方面作为预测因素进行评估的。参与者包括250名8-12岁的儿童。以工作记忆、移动、抑制、问题解决、计划和非语言流畅性为自变量,控制基本阅读、听力理解和智商,采用多元层次回归预测RC。结果表明,工作记忆、问题解决和非语言流畅性预测RC。当我们使用完形填空RC任务时,一个人可能需要WM来记住文章,以及解决问题和流畅性/发散性思维来得出最好的单词来完成文章。此外,我们的数据支持一个多方面的RC范式,包括EF在阅读的简单视图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Formula: see text] Should executive functioning be included in models of reading comprehension, and if so, which aspects?

The "Simple View of Reading" model postulates that reading comprehension (RC) is based on two component skills: basic reading ability and language comprehension. However, others suggest that various aspects of executive functioning (EF) contribute to RC. Thus, we examined EF in a comprehensive fashion to determine which aspects predict RC and to challenge the Simple View of Reading. Although numerous studies have examined working memory as a contributor to RC, and several have examined other specific aspects of EF, ours may be the first to assess multiple aspects of EF as predictors while controlling both basic reading and listening comprehension. Participants included a mixed sample of 250 children, aged 8-12 years. Multiple hierarchical regression was used to predict RC, with working memory, shifting, inhibition, problem-solving, planning, and nonverbal fluency being the independent variables, controlling basic reading, listening comprehension, and IQ. Results indicated that working memory, problem-solving, and nonverbal fluency predicted RC. As we used a cloze RC task, one likely needs WM to hold the passage in mind, and problem-solving and fluency/divergent thinking to derive the best word to complete the passage. In addition, our data support a multifaceted RC paradigm that includes EF over the Simple View of Reading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书