颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的体内、体外和计算机模型研究进展。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2026.110685
Fanqiang Meng , Hanlu Xiang , Mengjie Huo , Jiaqi Wu , Wentao Yao , Hebo Wang
{"title":"颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的体内、体外和计算机模型研究进展。","authors":"Fanqiang Meng ,&nbsp;Hanlu Xiang ,&nbsp;Mengjie Huo ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wu ,&nbsp;Wentao Yao ,&nbsp;Hebo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2026.110685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major global cause of stroke with high recurrence risk. However, research on its pathophysiology is limited by difficulties in obtaining histopathological samples and the absence of adequate experimental models. The rising incidence of ICAS imposes a significant burden on families and healthcare systems, highlighting the urgent need for affordable, robust, and reliable animal models to study its prevention and treatment. To better understand the disease, researchers frequently employ animal models to replicate the progression of ICAS in humans. In recent years, many researchers have provided a variety of solutions for modeling methods and intervention protocols in animal models of ICAS, which has greatly improved the success rate of atherosclerosis models. Nevertheless, variations in intervention factors, material selection, and treatment methods have resulted in no consensus on the optimal animal model for ICAS. This review evaluates the strengths and limitations of existing in vivo、in vitro model and computational models of ICAS and the atherosclerotic process, aiming to inform better future models and drive novel stroke-reducing treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"429 ","pages":"Article 110685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research progress in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Fanqiang Meng ,&nbsp;Hanlu Xiang ,&nbsp;Mengjie Huo ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wu ,&nbsp;Wentao Yao ,&nbsp;Hebo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2026.110685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major global cause of stroke with high recurrence risk. However, research on its pathophysiology is limited by difficulties in obtaining histopathological samples and the absence of adequate experimental models. The rising incidence of ICAS imposes a significant burden on families and healthcare systems, highlighting the urgent need for affordable, robust, and reliable animal models to study its prevention and treatment. To better understand the disease, researchers frequently employ animal models to replicate the progression of ICAS in humans. In recent years, many researchers have provided a variety of solutions for modeling methods and intervention protocols in animal models of ICAS, which has greatly improved the success rate of atherosclerosis models. Nevertheless, variations in intervention factors, material selection, and treatment methods have resulted in no consensus on the optimal animal model for ICAS. This review evaluates the strengths and limitations of existing in vivo、in vitro model and computational models of ICAS and the atherosclerotic process, aiming to inform better future models and drive novel stroke-reducing treatment strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"429 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027026000142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027026000142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)是全球卒中的主要原因,具有高复发风险。然而,其病理生理学的研究受到组织病理样本获取困难和缺乏足够的实验模型的限制。ICAS发病率的上升给家庭和卫生保健系统带来了沉重的负担,因此迫切需要可负担得起的、健壮的和可靠的动物模型来研究其预防和治疗。为了更好地了解这种疾病,研究人员经常使用动物模型在人类身上复制ICAS的进展。近年来,许多研究者为ICAS动物模型的建模方法和干预方案提供了多种解决方案,大大提高了动脉粥样硬化模型的成功率。然而,干预因素、材料选择和治疗方法的变化导致对ICAS的最佳动物模型没有达成共识。本综述评估了现有的ICAS和动脉粥样硬化过程的体内、体外模型和计算模型的优势和局限性,旨在为未来更好的模型提供信息,并推动新的减少中风的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research progress in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis
Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major global cause of stroke with high recurrence risk. However, research on its pathophysiology is limited by difficulties in obtaining histopathological samples and the absence of adequate experimental models. The rising incidence of ICAS imposes a significant burden on families and healthcare systems, highlighting the urgent need for affordable, robust, and reliable animal models to study its prevention and treatment. To better understand the disease, researchers frequently employ animal models to replicate the progression of ICAS in humans. In recent years, many researchers have provided a variety of solutions for modeling methods and intervention protocols in animal models of ICAS, which has greatly improved the success rate of atherosclerosis models. Nevertheless, variations in intervention factors, material selection, and treatment methods have resulted in no consensus on the optimal animal model for ICAS. This review evaluates the strengths and limitations of existing in vivo、in vitro model and computational models of ICAS and the atherosclerotic process, aiming to inform better future models and drive novel stroke-reducing treatment strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书