Chenxu Yu, Kun Li, Yanqi Shi, Yuan Yao, Qian Xie, Jiayu Li, Jiang-Yang Shao, Yishi Wu, Qing Liao, Cunbin An and Hongbing Fu
{"title":"非熔合环电子受体中轴对称和中心对称分子结构对光伏性能的影响","authors":"Chenxu Yu, Kun Li, Yanqi Shi, Yuan Yao, Qian Xie, Jiayu Li, Jiang-Yang Shao, Yishi Wu, Qing Liao, Cunbin An and Hongbing Fu","doi":"10.1039/D5TC02718G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The geometric configuration of electron acceptors significantly governs molecular dipole moments and stacking behavior, thereby critically influencing power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) in organic solar cells (OSCs). In this study, we designed and synthesized two non-fused ring electron acceptors (NFREAs), TTCIC (axisymmetric) and TCIC (centrosymmetric), by incorporating 3,6-bis(octan-3-yloxy)thieno[3,2-<em>b</em>]thiophene and 3,4-bis(octan-3-yloxy)thiophene units, respectively. Compared to TTCIC, TCIC exhibits a higher LUMO (−3.89 eV <em>vs.</em> −3.98 eV), a lower HOMO (−5.40 eV <em>vs.</em> −5.35 eV), a large dipole moment change (0.217 D <em>vs.</em> 0 D) between the ground state and excited state dipoles, and weaker intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, both acceptors showed an edge-on molecular orientation in the films; however, after blending with a polymer donor, PBDB-T, TTCIC blend films exhibited preferential edge-on molecular alignment, whereas TCIC blend films adopted a face-on orientation. This morphological contrast induced stronger charge carrier recombination in PBDB-T:TTCIC blends. Consequently, PBDB-T:TTCIC-based OSCs achieved an exceptionally low PCE of 0.60%, while PBDB-T:TCIC devices delivered a moderate PCE of 8.66%. These results demonstrate that fine-tuning of NFREA geometric configurations is essential for optimizing the molecular stacking orientation and enhancing the OSC performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":84,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Chemistry C","volume":" 41","pages":" 21066-21074"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of axisymmetric and centrosymmetric molecular architectures in non-fused ring electron acceptors on photovoltaic performance\",\"authors\":\"Chenxu Yu, Kun Li, Yanqi Shi, Yuan Yao, Qian Xie, Jiayu Li, Jiang-Yang Shao, Yishi Wu, Qing Liao, Cunbin An and Hongbing Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5TC02718G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The geometric configuration of electron acceptors significantly governs molecular dipole moments and stacking behavior, thereby critically influencing power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) in organic solar cells (OSCs). In this study, we designed and synthesized two non-fused ring electron acceptors (NFREAs), TTCIC (axisymmetric) and TCIC (centrosymmetric), by incorporating 3,6-bis(octan-3-yloxy)thieno[3,2-<em>b</em>]thiophene and 3,4-bis(octan-3-yloxy)thiophene units, respectively. Compared to TTCIC, TCIC exhibits a higher LUMO (−3.89 eV <em>vs.</em> −3.98 eV), a lower HOMO (−5.40 eV <em>vs.</em> −5.35 eV), a large dipole moment change (0.217 D <em>vs.</em> 0 D) between the ground state and excited state dipoles, and weaker intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, both acceptors showed an edge-on molecular orientation in the films; however, after blending with a polymer donor, PBDB-T, TTCIC blend films exhibited preferential edge-on molecular alignment, whereas TCIC blend films adopted a face-on orientation. This morphological contrast induced stronger charge carrier recombination in PBDB-T:TTCIC blends. Consequently, PBDB-T:TTCIC-based OSCs achieved an exceptionally low PCE of 0.60%, while PBDB-T:TCIC devices delivered a moderate PCE of 8.66%. These results demonstrate that fine-tuning of NFREA geometric configurations is essential for optimizing the molecular stacking orientation and enhancing the OSC performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Materials Chemistry C\",\"volume\":\" 41\",\"pages\":\" 21066-21074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Materials Chemistry C\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/tc/d5tc02718g\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Chemistry C","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/tc/d5tc02718g","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
电子受体的几何构型显著地控制着分子偶极矩和堆叠行为,从而对有机太阳能电池(OSCs)中的功率转换效率(pce)产生关键影响。本研究以3,6-二(辛烷-3-氧基)噻吩和3,4-二(辛烷-3-氧基)噻吩为单元,设计并合成了两种非熔融环电子受体(NFREAs) TTCIC(轴对称)和TCIC(中心对称)。与TTCIC相比,TCIC表现出更高的LUMO (- 3.89 eV vs. - 3.98 eV),更低的HOMO (- 5.40 eV vs. - 5.35 eV),基态和激发态偶极子之间的偶极矩变化较大(0.217 D vs. 0 D),分子间相互作用较弱。有趣的是,这两种受体在薄膜中都表现出了一种侧面的分子取向;然而,在与聚合物供体PBDB-T共混后,TTCIC共混膜表现出优先的边朝分子取向,而TCIC共混膜则表现出面朝取向。这种形态对比在PBDB-T:TTCIC共混物中诱导了更强的载流子复合。因此,基于PBDB-T: ttcic的OSCs实现了0.60%的极低PCE,而PBDB-T:TCIC器件提供了8.66%的中等PCE。这些结果表明,微调NFREA的几何构型对于优化分子堆叠方向和提高盐态碳性能至关重要。
The impact of axisymmetric and centrosymmetric molecular architectures in non-fused ring electron acceptors on photovoltaic performance
The geometric configuration of electron acceptors significantly governs molecular dipole moments and stacking behavior, thereby critically influencing power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) in organic solar cells (OSCs). In this study, we designed and synthesized two non-fused ring electron acceptors (NFREAs), TTCIC (axisymmetric) and TCIC (centrosymmetric), by incorporating 3,6-bis(octan-3-yloxy)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene and 3,4-bis(octan-3-yloxy)thiophene units, respectively. Compared to TTCIC, TCIC exhibits a higher LUMO (−3.89 eV vs. −3.98 eV), a lower HOMO (−5.40 eV vs. −5.35 eV), a large dipole moment change (0.217 D vs. 0 D) between the ground state and excited state dipoles, and weaker intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, both acceptors showed an edge-on molecular orientation in the films; however, after blending with a polymer donor, PBDB-T, TTCIC blend films exhibited preferential edge-on molecular alignment, whereas TCIC blend films adopted a face-on orientation. This morphological contrast induced stronger charge carrier recombination in PBDB-T:TTCIC blends. Consequently, PBDB-T:TTCIC-based OSCs achieved an exceptionally low PCE of 0.60%, while PBDB-T:TCIC devices delivered a moderate PCE of 8.66%. These results demonstrate that fine-tuning of NFREA geometric configurations is essential for optimizing the molecular stacking orientation and enhancing the OSC performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Materials Chemistry is divided into three distinct sections, A, B, and C, each catering to specific applications of the materials under study:
Journal of Materials Chemistry A focuses primarily on materials intended for applications in energy and sustainability.
Journal of Materials Chemistry B specializes in materials designed for applications in biology and medicine.
Journal of Materials Chemistry C is dedicated to materials suitable for applications in optical, magnetic, and electronic devices.
Example topic areas within the scope of Journal of Materials Chemistry C are listed below. This list is neither exhaustive nor exclusive.
Bioelectronics
Conductors
Detectors
Dielectrics
Displays
Ferroelectrics
Lasers
LEDs
Lighting
Liquid crystals
Memory
Metamaterials
Multiferroics
Photonics
Photovoltaics
Semiconductors
Sensors
Single molecule conductors
Spintronics
Superconductors
Thermoelectrics
Topological insulators
Transistors