ai介导的高等教育中教师人际行为的学生视角:一项Q方法论研究

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kaveh Jalilzadeh, Ferdi Çelik, Volkan Duran
{"title":"ai介导的高等教育中教师人际行为的学生视角:一项Q方法论研究","authors":"Kaveh Jalilzadeh,&nbsp;Ferdi Çelik,&nbsp;Volkan Duran","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study\",\"authors\":\"Kaveh Jalilzadeh,&nbsp;Ferdi Çelik,&nbsp;Volkan Duran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70293\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育中人工智能(AI)的研究在很大程度上强调技术表现和结果,使得学生对人工智能介导的课堂中教师人际行为的看法没有得到充分的理解。作为回应,本研究应用Q方法,支持内容和情绪分析,以检查学生的观点。共有30名大学生对40个陈述进行q排序,包括移情、即时性、清晰度、自主支持、参与度和个性化。随后,主成分分析与变量旋转产生了四个因素:(F0)选择性连接寻求者,(F1)自主合作者,(F2)游戏化驱动的极简主义者和(F3)清晰和同理心倡导者。此外,开放式反思集中在七个主题中,最常见的是清晰度和教学精度以及移情和情感支持。与此同时,情绪分析显示,主要是积极的中性语气,对过度个性化有一定的抵制。总体而言,研究结果表明,真实的互动、透明的标准和与个人资料一致的差异化(包括有针对性的游戏化)对于维持有意义的师生关系至关重要。因此,根据调查结果提出了若干可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study

Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study

Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信