{"title":"ai介导的高等教育中教师人际行为的学生视角:一项Q方法论研究","authors":"Kaveh Jalilzadeh, Ferdi Çelik, Volkan Duran","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study\",\"authors\":\"Kaveh Jalilzadeh, Ferdi Çelik, Volkan Duran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70293\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Student Perspectives on Teacher Interpersonal Behaviours in AI-Mediated Higher Education: A Q Methodology Study
Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education largely emphasises technical performance and outcomes, leaving student views of teacher interpersonal behaviours in AI-mediated classrooms insufficiently understood. In response, this study applied Q methodology, supported by content and sentiment analyses, to examine student perspectives. A total of 30 university students Q-sorted 40 statements, covering empathy, immediacy, clarity, autonomy support, engagement and personalization. Subsequently, principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded four factors: (F0) Selective-Connection Seekers, (F1) Autonomous Collaborators, (F2) Gamification-Driven Minimalists and (F3) Clarity and Empathy Advocates. Additionally, open-ended reflections clustered into seven themes, with Clarity and Instructional Precision and Empathy and Emotional Support most frequent. At the same time, sentiment analysis showed predominantly positive–neutral tones, with some resistance to over-personalization. Overall, the findings indicated that authentic interaction, transparent criteria and profile-aligned differentiation (including targeted gamification) are pivotal for sustaining meaningful teacher–student relationships. Accordingly, several actionable suggestions were provided based on the findings.
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.