Viktoria Gruber, Stephanie Morakeas, Murray Hinder, Thomas Drevhammar, Mithilesh Dronavalli, Mark Brian Tracy
{"title":"足月新生儿CPAP稳定期间的泄漏:复苏装置设计是否影响输送的PEEP -一项实验研究。","authors":"Viktoria Gruber, Stephanie Morakeas, Murray Hinder, Thomas Drevhammar, Mithilesh Dronavalli, Mark Brian Tracy","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mask leak is common during newborn resuscitation, impacting delivered ventilation. Less is known about the effect of leak during assisted spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Compare CPAP performance in the presence of leak of two T-piece resuscitation devices, with differing design-imposed resistances: high resistance Neopuff and low resistance rPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Devices were tested on a term dynamic lung model (compliance 1.0 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O, tidal volume (VT) 23 mL) at three incremental leak levels and set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Continuous leaks were generated by differing-length tubes open to atmosphere. Measured parameters were mean pressure, fluctuations around set pressure (∆P), VT and leak flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2437 breaths were analysed (1216 rPAP, 1221 Neopuff). Leak reduced PEEP, with the largest reduction at the highest leak and 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Higher delivered PEEP was associated with higher leak flows (Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP). VT reduced with Neopuff compared with rPAP (Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL, no leak, 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP) and was affected by delivered PEEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The delivered support differed between devices in the presence of leaks. rPAP maintained pressures closer to the set PEEP value at all leak levels, and higher leak flows were seen with the maintained distending pressure. Neopuff's higher resistance led to reductions in VT that were more pronounced at low leak levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leak during term neonatal CPAP stabilisation: does resuscitation device design affect delivered PEEP - a bench study.\",\"authors\":\"Viktoria Gruber, Stephanie Morakeas, Murray Hinder, Thomas Drevhammar, Mithilesh Dronavalli, Mark Brian Tracy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mask leak is common during newborn resuscitation, impacting delivered ventilation. Less is known about the effect of leak during assisted spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Compare CPAP performance in the presence of leak of two T-piece resuscitation devices, with differing design-imposed resistances: high resistance Neopuff and low resistance rPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Devices were tested on a term dynamic lung model (compliance 1.0 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O, tidal volume (VT) 23 mL) at three incremental leak levels and set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Continuous leaks were generated by differing-length tubes open to atmosphere. Measured parameters were mean pressure, fluctuations around set pressure (∆P), VT and leak flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2437 breaths were analysed (1216 rPAP, 1221 Neopuff). Leak reduced PEEP, with the largest reduction at the highest leak and 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Higher delivered PEEP was associated with higher leak flows (Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP). VT reduced with Neopuff compared with rPAP (Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL, no leak, 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP) and was affected by delivered PEEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The delivered support differed between devices in the presence of leaks. rPAP maintained pressures closer to the set PEEP value at all leak levels, and higher leak flows were seen with the maintained distending pressure. Neopuff's higher resistance led to reductions in VT that were more pronounced at low leak levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003679\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新生儿复苏过程中口罩泄漏是常见的,影响新生儿通气。在持续气道正压通气(CPAP)辅助自主呼吸过程中,漏气的影响尚不清楚。目的:比较两种具有不同设计阻力的t片式复苏装置在存在泄漏时的CPAP性能:高阻力Neopuff和低阻力rPAP。方法:在三种增量泄漏水平下,设置呼气末正压(PEEP) 5 cmH2O、7 cmH2O和9 cmH2O,在长期动态肺模型(顺应性1.0 mL/cmH2O,潮气量(VT) 23 mL)上对装置进行测试。不同长度的管道向大气开放,产生连续泄漏。测量参数为平均压力、设定压力周围波动(∆P)、VT和泄漏流量。结果:共分析2437次呼吸(rPAP 1216次,Neopuff 1221次)。泄漏降低了PEEP,最大泄漏降低最大,9 cmH2O设置PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH2O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH2O)。较高的PEEP与较高的泄漏流量相关(Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH2O设定PEEP)。与rPAP相比,Neopuff组VT降低(Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL,无泄漏,9 cmH2O设定PEEP),并受输送PEEP的影响。结论:在存在泄漏的情况下,不同设备提供的支持不同。在所有泄漏水平下,rPAP保持压力更接近设定的PEEP值,并且在保持膨胀压力的情况下,可以看到更高的泄漏流量。Neopuff的高阻力导致VT的降低,在低泄漏水平下更为明显。
Leak during term neonatal CPAP stabilisation: does resuscitation device design affect delivered PEEP - a bench study.
Background: Mask leak is common during newborn resuscitation, impacting delivered ventilation. Less is known about the effect of leak during assisted spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
Aim: Compare CPAP performance in the presence of leak of two T-piece resuscitation devices, with differing design-imposed resistances: high resistance Neopuff and low resistance rPAP.
Methods: Devices were tested on a term dynamic lung model (compliance 1.0 mL/cmH2O, tidal volume (VT) 23 mL) at three incremental leak levels and set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, 7 cmH2O and 9 cmH2O. Continuous leaks were generated by differing-length tubes open to atmosphere. Measured parameters were mean pressure, fluctuations around set pressure (∆P), VT and leak flow.
Results: 2437 breaths were analysed (1216 rPAP, 1221 Neopuff). Leak reduced PEEP, with the largest reduction at the highest leak and 9 cmH2O set PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH2O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH2O). Higher delivered PEEP was associated with higher leak flows (Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH2O set PEEP). VT reduced with Neopuff compared with rPAP (Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL, no leak, 9 cmH2O set PEEP) and was affected by delivered PEEP.
Conclusion: The delivered support differed between devices in the presence of leaks. rPAP maintained pressures closer to the set PEEP value at all leak levels, and higher leak flows were seen with the maintained distending pressure. Neopuff's higher resistance led to reductions in VT that were more pronounced at low leak levels.