利用504计划探索双优青年在学校的经历

IF 4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
RaeAnne Lindsay, Elisabeth B. Rossi, Bridget C. Smith, Nehal Abaza, Sara Renzulli, Meghan M. Burke
{"title":"利用504计划探索双优青年在学校的经历","authors":"RaeAnne Lindsay, Elisabeth B. Rossi, Bridget C. Smith, Nehal Abaza, Sara Renzulli, Meghan M. Burke","doi":"10.1177/00169862251378118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some students are twice-exceptional (i.e., they are gifted and have a disability). Such students are likely to qualify for educational support through Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. However, little is known about their families’ experiences in accessing supports; it is possible that their disabilities overshadow their giftedness. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of families of twice-exceptional students with Section 504 plans. Altogether, 20 families of twice-exceptional students participated in individual interviews. Participants reported that individual, family, and system characteristics impacted their experiences with accessing accommodations under the auspice of Section 504. The student’s giftedness and ability to mask often precluded access to needed accommodations. A family’s use of strategist and/or formal advocacy, professional and/or lived experience with disability, and social networks facilitated access to needed accommodations. Participants frequently reported that educators and administrators prevented access to needed accommodations. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Experiences of Twice-Exceptional Youth With Section 504 Plans in School\",\"authors\":\"RaeAnne Lindsay, Elisabeth B. Rossi, Bridget C. Smith, Nehal Abaza, Sara Renzulli, Meghan M. Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00169862251378118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some students are twice-exceptional (i.e., they are gifted and have a disability). Such students are likely to qualify for educational support through Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. However, little is known about their families’ experiences in accessing supports; it is possible that their disabilities overshadow their giftedness. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of families of twice-exceptional students with Section 504 plans. Altogether, 20 families of twice-exceptional students participated in individual interviews. Participants reported that individual, family, and system characteristics impacted their experiences with accessing accommodations under the auspice of Section 504. The student’s giftedness and ability to mask often precluded access to needed accommodations. A family’s use of strategist and/or formal advocacy, professional and/or lived experience with disability, and social networks facilitated access to needed accommodations. Participants frequently reported that educators and administrators prevented access to needed accommodations. Implications for research and practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted Child Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted Child Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251378118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251378118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有些学生是双重例外(即,他们有天赋又有残疾)。这样的学生很可能有资格通过1973年康复法案第504条获得教育支持。然而,他们的家庭在获得支持方面的经历却鲜为人知;他们的残疾可能掩盖了他们的天赋。摘要本研究的目的在于探讨“504计划”双重优异学生的家庭经验。共有20个优等生家庭参加了个别访谈。参与者报告说,个人、家庭和系统特征影响了他们在第504条的支持下获得住宿的经历。这个学生的天赋和掩饰能力常常使他无法获得所需的帮助。一个家庭使用策略和/或正式的倡导,专业和/或残疾生活经验,以及社会网络,有助于获得所需的住宿。参与者经常报告说,教育工作者和管理人员阻止他们获得所需的住宿。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Experiences of Twice-Exceptional Youth With Section 504 Plans in School
Some students are twice-exceptional (i.e., they are gifted and have a disability). Such students are likely to qualify for educational support through Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. However, little is known about their families’ experiences in accessing supports; it is possible that their disabilities overshadow their giftedness. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of families of twice-exceptional students with Section 504 plans. Altogether, 20 families of twice-exceptional students participated in individual interviews. Participants reported that individual, family, and system characteristics impacted their experiences with accessing accommodations under the auspice of Section 504. The student’s giftedness and ability to mask often precluded access to needed accommodations. A family’s use of strategist and/or formal advocacy, professional and/or lived experience with disability, and social networks facilitated access to needed accommodations. Participants frequently reported that educators and administrators prevented access to needed accommodations. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
29.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信