多节段腰椎融合术中骨水泥增强对椎弓根螺钉固定和相邻节段疾病的生物力学影响:有限元分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2550294.147
Min-Young Jo, Sung-Jae Lee, Je-Hoon An, Young-Hoon Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Hyung-Youl Park
{"title":"多节段腰椎融合术中骨水泥增强对椎弓根螺钉固定和相邻节段疾病的生物力学影响:有限元分析。","authors":"Min-Young Jo, Sung-Jae Lee, Je-Hoon An, Young-Hoon Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Hyung-Youl Park","doi":"10.14245/ns.2550294.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cement augmentation is widely used to enhance pedicle screw fixation, particularly in osteoporotic patients. However, its effects on adjacent segment disease (ASD) and implant failure in multilevel lumbar interbody fusion remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of cement augmentation in preventing implant failure and its impact on ASD risk using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A FEA of L2-S1 multilevel lumbar interbody fusion was performed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of cement augmentation. Three models were analyzed under normal and osteoporotic conditions: type 1 (no augmentation), type 2 (upper instrumented vertebra [UIV] augmentation), and type 3 (UIV and UIV+1 augmentation). Range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), screw pull-out risk, and implant failure were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cement augmentation significantly reduced screw pull-out risk, particularly in osteoporotic conditions, where type 1 exhibited a failure rate of 91.5%, while type 2 and type 3 remained below 39%. Cement augmentation did not demonstrate a substantial impact on ASD development, as ROM and IDP changes remained within a minimal range in this FEA model. However, osteoporosis was associated with a substantial increase in IDP, with a result as high as 809%. Despite its benefits, augmentation at UIV+1 increased the risk of pedicle screw breakage and vertebral body fracture, with L1 (UIV+1) lower endplate fracture rate of 82.7% in type 3, compared to 56.6% in type 2 and 52.8% in type 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cement augmentation effectively improves screw fixation and does not appear to significantly increase ASD risk based on this FEA study. Limiting cement augmentation to the UIV level in lumbar multilevel fusion may help reduce the risk of implant failure, though further clinical validation is required to confirm these biomechanical findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"22 3","pages":"763-773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Min-Young Jo, Sung-Jae Lee, Je-Hoon An, Young-Hoon Kim, Jun-Seok Lee, Hyung-Youl Park\",\"doi\":\"10.14245/ns.2550294.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cement augmentation is widely used to enhance pedicle screw fixation, particularly in osteoporotic patients. However, its effects on adjacent segment disease (ASD) and implant failure in multilevel lumbar interbody fusion remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of cement augmentation in preventing implant failure and its impact on ASD risk using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A FEA of L2-S1 multilevel lumbar interbody fusion was performed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of cement augmentation. Three models were analyzed under normal and osteoporotic conditions: type 1 (no augmentation), type 2 (upper instrumented vertebra [UIV] augmentation), and type 3 (UIV and UIV+1 augmentation). Range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), screw pull-out risk, and implant failure were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cement augmentation significantly reduced screw pull-out risk, particularly in osteoporotic conditions, where type 1 exhibited a failure rate of 91.5%, while type 2 and type 3 remained below 39%. Cement augmentation did not demonstrate a substantial impact on ASD development, as ROM and IDP changes remained within a minimal range in this FEA model. However, osteoporosis was associated with a substantial increase in IDP, with a result as high as 809%. Despite its benefits, augmentation at UIV+1 increased the risk of pedicle screw breakage and vertebral body fracture, with L1 (UIV+1) lower endplate fracture rate of 82.7% in type 3, compared to 56.6% in type 2 and 52.8% in type 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cement augmentation effectively improves screw fixation and does not appear to significantly increase ASD risk based on this FEA study. Limiting cement augmentation to the UIV level in lumbar multilevel fusion may help reduce the risk of implant failure, though further clinical validation is required to confirm these biomechanical findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurospine\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"763-773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurospine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2550294.147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2550294.147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨水泥增强术广泛应用于椎弓根螺钉固定,尤其是骨质疏松患者。然而,其对多节段腰椎椎体间融合术中相邻节段疾病(ASD)和植入物失败的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用有限元分析(FEA)评估水泥增强在预防种植体失败方面的有效性及其对ASD风险的影响。方法:采用FEA对L2-S1多节段腰椎椎体间融合术评价骨水泥增强的生物力学效果。在正常和骨质疏松情况下分析3种模型:1型(未隆胸)、2型(上固定椎体[UIV]隆胸)和3型(UIV和UIV+1隆胸)。评估活动范围(ROM)、椎间盘内压力(IDP)、螺钉拔出风险和内固定失败。结果:水泥增强术显著降低了螺钉拔出风险,特别是在骨质疏松的情况下,1型的失败率为91.5%,而2型和3型的失败率仍低于39%。在该FEA模型中,由于ROM和IDP的变化保持在最小的范围内,因此水泥增强并未显示出对ASD发展的实质性影响。然而,骨质疏松症与IDP的大幅增加有关,其结果高达809%。尽管有好处,但UIV+1增强术增加了椎弓根螺钉断裂和椎体骨折的风险,L1 (UIV+1)终板骨折率较低,3型为82.7%,而2型为56.6%,1型为52.8%。结论:根据本有限元分析,骨水泥增强术有效改善螺钉固定,并没有明显增加ASD的风险。在腰椎多节段融合术中将水泥增强限制在UIV水平可能有助于降低植入物失败的风险,尽管需要进一步的临床验证来证实这些生物力学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical Impact of Cement Augmentation on Pedicle Screw Fixation and Adjacent Segment Disease in Multilevel Lumbar Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Objective: Cement augmentation is widely used to enhance pedicle screw fixation, particularly in osteoporotic patients. However, its effects on adjacent segment disease (ASD) and implant failure in multilevel lumbar interbody fusion remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of cement augmentation in preventing implant failure and its impact on ASD risk using finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods: A FEA of L2-S1 multilevel lumbar interbody fusion was performed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of cement augmentation. Three models were analyzed under normal and osteoporotic conditions: type 1 (no augmentation), type 2 (upper instrumented vertebra [UIV] augmentation), and type 3 (UIV and UIV+1 augmentation). Range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), screw pull-out risk, and implant failure were assessed.

Results: Cement augmentation significantly reduced screw pull-out risk, particularly in osteoporotic conditions, where type 1 exhibited a failure rate of 91.5%, while type 2 and type 3 remained below 39%. Cement augmentation did not demonstrate a substantial impact on ASD development, as ROM and IDP changes remained within a minimal range in this FEA model. However, osteoporosis was associated with a substantial increase in IDP, with a result as high as 809%. Despite its benefits, augmentation at UIV+1 increased the risk of pedicle screw breakage and vertebral body fracture, with L1 (UIV+1) lower endplate fracture rate of 82.7% in type 3, compared to 56.6% in type 2 and 52.8% in type 1.

Conclusion: Cement augmentation effectively improves screw fixation and does not appear to significantly increase ASD risk based on this FEA study. Limiting cement augmentation to the UIV level in lumbar multilevel fusion may help reduce the risk of implant failure, though further clinical validation is required to confirm these biomechanical findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信