寰枢椎重建:颅椎联合脊柱手术的巧妙演变。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2550960.480
Sang Hoon Hwang, Seung Jun Ryu, Min Han Kim, Jong Koo Lee, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Chong Man Kim, Jin Hoon Park
{"title":"寰枢椎重建:颅椎联合脊柱手术的巧妙演变。","authors":"Sang Hoon Hwang, Seung Jun Ryu, Min Han Kim, Jong Koo Lee, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Chong Man Kim, Jin Hoon Park","doi":"10.14245/ns.2550960.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The atlantoaxial (C1-2) junction is among the most technically demanding regions for cervical spine surgery owing to its complex osseoligamentous anatomy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Numerous posterior fixation constructs have been developed to optimize biomechanical rigidity and promote arthrodesis. Since Gallie's introduction of posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts in 1939, evolving techniques have focused on enhancing fusion rates while minimizing risk to adjacent structures. This paper outlines the historical evolution of C1-2 posterior instrumentation, current fixation strategies, bone fusion techniques, and reduction methods. A systematic literature search identified 61 relevant studies on C1-2 fusion. Additional references were manually reviewed to provide a comprehensive context. Of these, 41 studies were narratively summarized to outline the historical and conceptual evolution of C1-2 fusion techniques, while the remaining 20 post-2000 studies on contemporary surgical modifications were systematically reviewed and tabulated for technical details and clinical outcomes. C1-2 fusion techniques have evolved significantly over time. Early methods primarily involved posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts, but later transitioned to rigid segmental fixation using pedicle screw constructs, resulting in improved fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Interarticular fusion, when concurrently performed, enhances the biological fusion environment, contributing to favorable clinical results. C1 lateral mass, posterior arch, pedicle screws and C2 pedicle, lamina screws give us much stronger stability and higher fusion rates. Interarticular fusion using local bone also gives us technical easiness guaranteeing high fusion rate overcoming inconvenience of wiring and iliac bone harvest. Interarticular height reduction and interarticular fusion should be discriminated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"22 3","pages":"634-649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atlantoaxial Reconstruction: The Artful Evolution of Craniovertebral Junctional Spine Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Sang Hoon Hwang, Seung Jun Ryu, Min Han Kim, Jong Koo Lee, Sun Woo Jang, Danbi Park, Chong Man Kim, Jin Hoon Park\",\"doi\":\"10.14245/ns.2550960.480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The atlantoaxial (C1-2) junction is among the most technically demanding regions for cervical spine surgery owing to its complex osseoligamentous anatomy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Numerous posterior fixation constructs have been developed to optimize biomechanical rigidity and promote arthrodesis. Since Gallie's introduction of posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts in 1939, evolving techniques have focused on enhancing fusion rates while minimizing risk to adjacent structures. This paper outlines the historical evolution of C1-2 posterior instrumentation, current fixation strategies, bone fusion techniques, and reduction methods. A systematic literature search identified 61 relevant studies on C1-2 fusion. Additional references were manually reviewed to provide a comprehensive context. Of these, 41 studies were narratively summarized to outline the historical and conceptual evolution of C1-2 fusion techniques, while the remaining 20 post-2000 studies on contemporary surgical modifications were systematically reviewed and tabulated for technical details and clinical outcomes. C1-2 fusion techniques have evolved significantly over time. Early methods primarily involved posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts, but later transitioned to rigid segmental fixation using pedicle screw constructs, resulting in improved fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Interarticular fusion, when concurrently performed, enhances the biological fusion environment, contributing to favorable clinical results. C1 lateral mass, posterior arch, pedicle screws and C2 pedicle, lamina screws give us much stronger stability and higher fusion rates. Interarticular fusion using local bone also gives us technical easiness guaranteeing high fusion rate overcoming inconvenience of wiring and iliac bone harvest. Interarticular height reduction and interarticular fusion should be discriminated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurospine\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"634-649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurospine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2550960.480\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2550960.480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寰枢关节(C1-2)是颈椎手术中技术要求最高的区域之一,因为其复杂的骨性疏松解剖结构和靠近关键的神经血管结构。许多后路固定装置已被开发用于优化生物力学刚度和促进关节融合术。自Gallie于1939年引入自体骨移植物后路连接以来,不断发展的技术集中在提高融合率的同时尽量减少对邻近结构的风险。本文概述了C1-2后路内固定的历史演变、当前的固定策略、骨融合技术和复位方法。通过系统的文献检索,我们发现了61篇关于C1-2融合的相关研究。额外的参考文献被手工审查,以提供一个全面的上下文。其中,41项研究进行了叙述性总结,概述了C1-2融合技术的历史和概念演变,而其余20项2000年后关于当代手术改良的研究进行了系统回顾,并列出了技术细节和临床结果。C1-2融合技术随着时间的推移有了显著的发展。早期的方法主要涉及自体骨移植物后路固定,但后来过渡到使用椎弓根螺钉结构的刚性节段固定,从而提高了融合率和临床结果。同时进行关节间融合可改善生物融合环境,有助于获得良好的临床结果。C1侧块、后弓、椎弓根螺钉和C2椎弓根、椎板螺钉为我们提供了更强的稳定性和更高的融合率。采用局部骨进行关节间融合术在技术上也较为简单,克服了连接和髂骨采集的不便,保证了较高的融合率。应区分关节间高度降低和关节间融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Atlantoaxial Reconstruction: The Artful Evolution of Craniovertebral Junctional Spine Surgery.

Atlantoaxial Reconstruction: The Artful Evolution of Craniovertebral Junctional Spine Surgery.

Atlantoaxial Reconstruction: The Artful Evolution of Craniovertebral Junctional Spine Surgery.

Atlantoaxial Reconstruction: The Artful Evolution of Craniovertebral Junctional Spine Surgery.

The atlantoaxial (C1-2) junction is among the most technically demanding regions for cervical spine surgery owing to its complex osseoligamentous anatomy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Numerous posterior fixation constructs have been developed to optimize biomechanical rigidity and promote arthrodesis. Since Gallie's introduction of posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts in 1939, evolving techniques have focused on enhancing fusion rates while minimizing risk to adjacent structures. This paper outlines the historical evolution of C1-2 posterior instrumentation, current fixation strategies, bone fusion techniques, and reduction methods. A systematic literature search identified 61 relevant studies on C1-2 fusion. Additional references were manually reviewed to provide a comprehensive context. Of these, 41 studies were narratively summarized to outline the historical and conceptual evolution of C1-2 fusion techniques, while the remaining 20 post-2000 studies on contemporary surgical modifications were systematically reviewed and tabulated for technical details and clinical outcomes. C1-2 fusion techniques have evolved significantly over time. Early methods primarily involved posterior wiring with autologous bone grafts, but later transitioned to rigid segmental fixation using pedicle screw constructs, resulting in improved fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Interarticular fusion, when concurrently performed, enhances the biological fusion environment, contributing to favorable clinical results. C1 lateral mass, posterior arch, pedicle screws and C2 pedicle, lamina screws give us much stronger stability and higher fusion rates. Interarticular fusion using local bone also gives us technical easiness guaranteeing high fusion rate overcoming inconvenience of wiring and iliac bone harvest. Interarticular height reduction and interarticular fusion should be discriminated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信