Silke Behrendt, Alexis Kuerbis, Anna Mejldal, Jens Søndergaard, Kjeld Andersen, Ulrik Becker, Marie Holm Eliasen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen
{"title":"中老年酒精使用问题患者长期酒精使用障碍治疗接受的预测因素","authors":"Silke Behrendt, Alexis Kuerbis, Anna Mejldal, Jens Søndergaard, Kjeld Andersen, Ulrik Becker, Marie Holm Eliasen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/dar.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cross-sectional evidence shows that alcohol use disorders (AUD) are under-treated. Knowledge is needed on longitudinal predictors of long-term receipt of AUD treatment among older adults.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the: (i) long-term occurrence of AUD treatment receipt during follow-up; (ii) time to treatment; and (iii) predictors of long-term treatment receipt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study. To create a baseline, a subsample from the Danish National Health Survey 2017 with a positive CAGE-C (n = 13,489, aged 55-80 years) was enriched with Danish national register data. AUD treatment data covered a follow-up period of up to 2.9 years following this baseline and came from the National Alcohol Treatment Register. Longitudinal predictors of treatment receipt were investigated with Cox regression analysis; time-to-treatment with Kaplan Meier curves. All analyses were conducted in the whole sample, in a subsample scoring ≥ 2 on the original CAGE (n = 3748, 28.9%), and in a subsample endorsing the CAGE-'Eye-opener'-criterion (n = 707, 6.2%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole sample, only 1.3% received AUD treatment in the follow-up period (3.9% in the CAGE- and 7.3% in the 'Eye-Opener'-criterion subsample). Across all samples, only about 40% of treatments were initiated by 12 months after baseline. Baseline contacts with health care providers and impaired well-being predicted a greater rate of treatment entry during follow-up (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Among older adults, AUD treatment uptake in the 2.9 years after reporting recent problematic alcohol use is rare. Treatment occurs with delay, regardless of problem severity. Contacts with health care providers are opportunities to support subsequent treatment receipt.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Long-Term Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Receipt Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Problematic Alcohol Use.\",\"authors\":\"Silke Behrendt, Alexis Kuerbis, Anna Mejldal, Jens Søndergaard, Kjeld Andersen, Ulrik Becker, Marie Holm Eliasen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cross-sectional evidence shows that alcohol use disorders (AUD) are under-treated. Knowledge is needed on longitudinal predictors of long-term receipt of AUD treatment among older adults.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the: (i) long-term occurrence of AUD treatment receipt during follow-up; (ii) time to treatment; and (iii) predictors of long-term treatment receipt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study. To create a baseline, a subsample from the Danish National Health Survey 2017 with a positive CAGE-C (n = 13,489, aged 55-80 years) was enriched with Danish national register data. AUD treatment data covered a follow-up period of up to 2.9 years following this baseline and came from the National Alcohol Treatment Register. Longitudinal predictors of treatment receipt were investigated with Cox regression analysis; time-to-treatment with Kaplan Meier curves. All analyses were conducted in the whole sample, in a subsample scoring ≥ 2 on the original CAGE (n = 3748, 28.9%), and in a subsample endorsing the CAGE-'Eye-opener'-criterion (n = 707, 6.2%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole sample, only 1.3% received AUD treatment in the follow-up period (3.9% in the CAGE- and 7.3% in the 'Eye-Opener'-criterion subsample). Across all samples, only about 40% of treatments were initiated by 12 months after baseline. Baseline contacts with health care providers and impaired well-being predicted a greater rate of treatment entry during follow-up (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Among older adults, AUD treatment uptake in the 2.9 years after reporting recent problematic alcohol use is rare. Treatment occurs with delay, regardless of problem severity. Contacts with health care providers are opportunities to support subsequent treatment receipt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of Long-Term Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Receipt Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Problematic Alcohol Use.
Introduction: Cross-sectional evidence shows that alcohol use disorders (AUD) are under-treated. Knowledge is needed on longitudinal predictors of long-term receipt of AUD treatment among older adults.
Aims: To identify the: (i) long-term occurrence of AUD treatment receipt during follow-up; (ii) time to treatment; and (iii) predictors of long-term treatment receipt.
Methods: Longitudinal cohort study. To create a baseline, a subsample from the Danish National Health Survey 2017 with a positive CAGE-C (n = 13,489, aged 55-80 years) was enriched with Danish national register data. AUD treatment data covered a follow-up period of up to 2.9 years following this baseline and came from the National Alcohol Treatment Register. Longitudinal predictors of treatment receipt were investigated with Cox regression analysis; time-to-treatment with Kaplan Meier curves. All analyses were conducted in the whole sample, in a subsample scoring ≥ 2 on the original CAGE (n = 3748, 28.9%), and in a subsample endorsing the CAGE-'Eye-opener'-criterion (n = 707, 6.2%).
Results: In the whole sample, only 1.3% received AUD treatment in the follow-up period (3.9% in the CAGE- and 7.3% in the 'Eye-Opener'-criterion subsample). Across all samples, only about 40% of treatments were initiated by 12 months after baseline. Baseline contacts with health care providers and impaired well-being predicted a greater rate of treatment entry during follow-up (p < 0.05).
Discussion and conclusions: Among older adults, AUD treatment uptake in the 2.9 years after reporting recent problematic alcohol use is rare. Treatment occurs with delay, regardless of problem severity. Contacts with health care providers are opportunities to support subsequent treatment receipt.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.