社会反应量表5项子集对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的区分评价。

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Misha Eliasziw, Carol Curtin, Susan L Hyman, Linmarie Sikich, Aviva Must
{"title":"社会反应量表5项子集对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的区分评价。","authors":"Misha Eliasziw, Carol Curtin, Susan L Hyman, Linmarie Sikich, Aviva Must","doi":"10.1007/s10803-025-07060-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) of all ages using a screening tool is valuable. We evaluated a shortened version of the 65-item Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,462 dyads from the Simons Simplex Collection consisted of a child with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of ASD and a sibling without ASD. All siblings were free of suspected intellectual disabilities and severe learning disabilities, had neither developmental nor psychiatric disorders, and did not have an Individual Education Plan for extensive special education services. Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) curves quantified scale performance. A non-inferiority margin of - 0.005 was pre-specified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUROC for the 5-item scale (5iSRS) was 0.9943, the predictive value positive was 97.3% and predictive value negative was 96.9%. The AUROC for the 65-item SRS was 0.9926, resulting in an AUROC difference of 0.0017 (95% CI=[- 0.0003, 0.0037]) and meeting the non-inferiority criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5iSRS can distinguish between children with and without ASD and is non-inferior to the 65-item SRS, and thus may have substantial utility in research, community, and clinical settings. Given that this initial evaluation of the shortened version was performed among children in simplex families with selected unaffected siblings, further evaluations in community and clinical settings among non-related children with varying levels of autistic traits and/or other behavioral challenges are needed prior to considering the shortened version as a viable ASD screening tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":15148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a 5-Item Subset of the Social Responsiveness Scale for Distinguishing Between Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Misha Eliasziw, Carol Curtin, Susan L Hyman, Linmarie Sikich, Aviva Must\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10803-025-07060-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) of all ages using a screening tool is valuable. We evaluated a shortened version of the 65-item Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,462 dyads from the Simons Simplex Collection consisted of a child with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of ASD and a sibling without ASD. All siblings were free of suspected intellectual disabilities and severe learning disabilities, had neither developmental nor psychiatric disorders, and did not have an Individual Education Plan for extensive special education services. Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) curves quantified scale performance. A non-inferiority margin of - 0.005 was pre-specified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUROC for the 5-item scale (5iSRS) was 0.9943, the predictive value positive was 97.3% and predictive value negative was 96.9%. The AUROC for the 65-item SRS was 0.9926, resulting in an AUROC difference of 0.0017 (95% CI=[- 0.0003, 0.0037]) and meeting the non-inferiority criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5iSRS can distinguish between children with and without ASD and is non-inferior to the 65-item SRS, and thus may have substantial utility in research, community, and clinical settings. Given that this initial evaluation of the shortened version was performed among children in simplex families with selected unaffected siblings, further evaluations in community and clinical settings among non-related children with varying levels of autistic traits and/or other behavioral challenges are needed prior to considering the shortened version as a viable ASD screening tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-025-07060-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-025-07060-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用筛查工具识别所有年龄段的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童是有价值的。我们评估了65项社会反应量表(SRS)的简化版本。方法:来自Simons Simplex Collection的1462对夫妇,包括一名临床确诊为ASD的儿童和一名无ASD的兄弟姐妹。所有的兄弟姐妹都没有疑似智力障碍和严重学习障碍,既没有发育障碍也没有精神障碍,没有接受广泛特殊教育服务的个人教育计划。AUROC曲线下的面积量化了量表的性能。预先规定了- 0.005的非劣效性裕度。结果:5项量表(5iSRS)的AUROC为0.9943,阳性预测值为97.3%,阴性预测值为96.9%。65项SRS的AUROC为0.9926,AUROC差异为0.0017 (95% CI=[- 0.0003, 0.0037]),符合非劣效性标准。结论:5iSRS可以区分自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童,不低于65项SRS,因此在研究、社区和临床环境中可能具有重要的实用性。鉴于缩短版本的初步评估是在有未受影响的兄弟姐妹的单一家庭的儿童中进行的,在考虑将缩短版本作为可行的ASD筛查工具之前,需要在社区和临床环境中对具有不同程度自闭症特征和/或其他行为挑战的非相关儿童进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a 5-Item Subset of the Social Responsiveness Scale for Distinguishing Between Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Purpose: Identifying children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) of all ages using a screening tool is valuable. We evaluated a shortened version of the 65-item Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

Methods: A total of 1,462 dyads from the Simons Simplex Collection consisted of a child with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of ASD and a sibling without ASD. All siblings were free of suspected intellectual disabilities and severe learning disabilities, had neither developmental nor psychiatric disorders, and did not have an Individual Education Plan for extensive special education services. Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) curves quantified scale performance. A non-inferiority margin of - 0.005 was pre-specified.

Results: The AUROC for the 5-item scale (5iSRS) was 0.9943, the predictive value positive was 97.3% and predictive value negative was 96.9%. The AUROC for the 65-item SRS was 0.9926, resulting in an AUROC difference of 0.0017 (95% CI=[- 0.0003, 0.0037]) and meeting the non-inferiority criterion.

Conclusion: The 5iSRS can distinguish between children with and without ASD and is non-inferior to the 65-item SRS, and thus may have substantial utility in research, community, and clinical settings. Given that this initial evaluation of the shortened version was performed among children in simplex families with selected unaffected siblings, further evaluations in community and clinical settings among non-related children with varying levels of autistic traits and/or other behavioral challenges are needed prior to considering the shortened version as a viable ASD screening tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
433
期刊介绍: The Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders seeks to advance theoretical and applied research as well as examine and evaluate clinical diagnoses and treatments for autism and related disabilities. JADD encourages research submissions on the causes of ASDs and related disorders, including genetic, immunological, and environmental factors; diagnosis and assessment tools (e.g., for early detection as well as behavioral and communications characteristics); and prevention and treatment options. Sample topics include: Social responsiveness in young children with autism Advances in diagnosing and reporting autism Omega-3 fatty acids to treat autism symptoms Parental and child adherence to behavioral and medical treatments for autism Increasing independent task completion by students with autism spectrum disorder Does laughter differ in children with autism? Predicting ASD diagnosis and social impairment in younger siblings of children with autism The effects of psychotropic and nonpsychotropic medication with adolescents and adults with ASD Increasing independence for individuals with ASDs Group interventions to promote social skills in school-aged children with ASDs Standard diagnostic measures for ASDs Substance abuse in adults with autism Differentiating between ADHD and autism symptoms Social competence and social skills training and interventions for children with ASDs Therapeutic horseback riding and social functioning in children with autism Authors and readers of the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders include sch olars, researchers, professionals, policy makers, and graduate students from a broad range of cross-disciplines, including developmental, clinical child, and school psychology; pediatrics; psychiatry; education; social work and counseling; speech, communication, and physical therapy; medicine and neuroscience; and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信