如果看不见,能量化吗?AV-HV混合交通的显性和隐性风险

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yulan Xia , Yan Zhang , Jiming Xie
{"title":"如果看不见,能量化吗?AV-HV混合交通的显性和隐性风险","authors":"Yulan Xia ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiming Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mixed traffic of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) poses complex safety challenges due to heterogeneous driving patterns. However, current risk assessment approaches predominantly address explicit risks, with limited attention to implicit risks hidden in driving dynamics. This study introduces a dual-perspective risk evaluation framework that jointly considers explicit and implicit risk in AV–HV interactions. Explicit risk represents the directly measurable collision threat from instantaneous motion states. It’s quantified by the reciprocal of extended time-to-collision (ETTC), integrating relative speed, distance, and motion vectors, then categorized into multi-level risk sets in the speed–distance domain. Implicit risk is reflected by underlying individual behavioral complexity and group driving heterogeneity that may precede risk conditions. It’s assessed via sample entropy to capture maneuver complexity, and group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to identify hidden heterogeneity in traffic flow. Applied to interweaving areas of highways and urban expressways, the framework reveals explicit and implicit risks during lane changes and car-following, and classifies three representative AV–HV trajectory clusters. The framework offers a dynamic, interpretable, and multi-scale depiction of mixed traffic risk, enabling proactive reliability enhancement and safety assurance for intelligent transportation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 111717"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If It Cannot Be Seen, Can It Be Quantified? Explicit and Implicit Risks in AV–HV Mixed Traffic\",\"authors\":\"Yulan Xia ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiming Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mixed traffic of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) poses complex safety challenges due to heterogeneous driving patterns. However, current risk assessment approaches predominantly address explicit risks, with limited attention to implicit risks hidden in driving dynamics. This study introduces a dual-perspective risk evaluation framework that jointly considers explicit and implicit risk in AV–HV interactions. Explicit risk represents the directly measurable collision threat from instantaneous motion states. It’s quantified by the reciprocal of extended time-to-collision (ETTC), integrating relative speed, distance, and motion vectors, then categorized into multi-level risk sets in the speed–distance domain. Implicit risk is reflected by underlying individual behavioral complexity and group driving heterogeneity that may precede risk conditions. It’s assessed via sample entropy to capture maneuver complexity, and group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to identify hidden heterogeneity in traffic flow. Applied to interweaving areas of highways and urban expressways, the framework reveals explicit and implicit risks during lane changes and car-following, and classifies three representative AV–HV trajectory clusters. The framework offers a dynamic, interpretable, and multi-scale depiction of mixed traffic risk, enabling proactive reliability enhancement and safety assurance for intelligent transportation systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025009172\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025009172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动驾驶汽车(AVs)和人类驾驶汽车(HVs)混合交通由于驾驶模式的异质性,带来了复杂的安全挑战。然而,目前的风险评估方法主要针对显性风险,而对隐藏在驱动动态中的隐性风险关注有限。本研究引入了一个双重视角的风险评估框架,该框架共同考虑了AV-HV相互作用中的显性和隐性风险。显式风险表示瞬时运动状态下直接可测量的碰撞威胁。通过扩展碰撞时间(ETTC)的倒数量化,整合相对速度、距离和运动向量,然后在速度-距离域将其分类为多级风险集。隐性风险反映在潜在的个体行为复杂性和群体驱动异质性中,这些异质性可能先于风险条件。通过样本熵评估机动复杂度,利用基于群体的轨迹建模(GBTM)识别交通流中隐藏的异质性。该框架应用于高速公路和城市高速公路的交叉区域,揭示了变道和跟车过程中的显性和隐性风险,并对三个具有代表性的AV-HV轨迹群进行了分类。该框架提供了一个动态的、可解释的、多尺度的混合交通风险描述,为智能交通系统提供了主动的可靠性增强和安全保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
If It Cannot Be Seen, Can It Be Quantified? Explicit and Implicit Risks in AV–HV Mixed Traffic
Mixed traffic of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) poses complex safety challenges due to heterogeneous driving patterns. However, current risk assessment approaches predominantly address explicit risks, with limited attention to implicit risks hidden in driving dynamics. This study introduces a dual-perspective risk evaluation framework that jointly considers explicit and implicit risk in AV–HV interactions. Explicit risk represents the directly measurable collision threat from instantaneous motion states. It’s quantified by the reciprocal of extended time-to-collision (ETTC), integrating relative speed, distance, and motion vectors, then categorized into multi-level risk sets in the speed–distance domain. Implicit risk is reflected by underlying individual behavioral complexity and group driving heterogeneity that may precede risk conditions. It’s assessed via sample entropy to capture maneuver complexity, and group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to identify hidden heterogeneity in traffic flow. Applied to interweaving areas of highways and urban expressways, the framework reveals explicit and implicit risks during lane changes and car-following, and classifies three representative AV–HV trajectory clusters. The framework offers a dynamic, interpretable, and multi-scale depiction of mixed traffic risk, enabling proactive reliability enhancement and safety assurance for intelligent transportation systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信