{"title":"基于系统理论事故模型与过程(STAMP)和贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)的油轮惰性气体系统概率风险评估","authors":"Bulut Ozan Ceylan , Gizem Elidolu , Sukru Ilke Sezer , Emre Akyuz , Zaili Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As shipboard systems increasingly prioritize automation over human intervention, risk assessment models must adapt to this paradigm shift. The proposed framework addresses this need by focusing on software, hardware, and external factors including human factors, aligning with modern technological dependencies. This research conducts an extensive risk analysis of the inert gas system (IGS) on oil tankers by adopting system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). While the STAMP identifies failure scenarios through a hierarchical control and feedback structure, BBN quantifies the failure probabilities based on STAMP outcomes. The study identifies critical failure pathways through STAMP’s systemic hazard analysis and BBN’s probabilistic quantification and calculates the system failure probability as 1.29E-01. The results indicate that the most critical failures in IGS are “Flame instability or burner failure”, “Inert gas blower fan failure”, and “Insufficient pressure during operation” from the hardware component. The methodology enhances predictive accuracy and provides actionable strategies for mitigating risks in increasingly automated maritime operations. The research outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights for maritime safety managers, safety inspectors, technical inspectors, HSEQ managers, and ship crews to improve operational safety as well as prevent potential risks for inert gas incidents on-board oil tankers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 111669"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic risk assessment for inert gas system on oil tanker ships using system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN)\",\"authors\":\"Bulut Ozan Ceylan , Gizem Elidolu , Sukru Ilke Sezer , Emre Akyuz , Zaili Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As shipboard systems increasingly prioritize automation over human intervention, risk assessment models must adapt to this paradigm shift. The proposed framework addresses this need by focusing on software, hardware, and external factors including human factors, aligning with modern technological dependencies. This research conducts an extensive risk analysis of the inert gas system (IGS) on oil tankers by adopting system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). While the STAMP identifies failure scenarios through a hierarchical control and feedback structure, BBN quantifies the failure probabilities based on STAMP outcomes. The study identifies critical failure pathways through STAMP’s systemic hazard analysis and BBN’s probabilistic quantification and calculates the system failure probability as 1.29E-01. The results indicate that the most critical failures in IGS are “Flame instability or burner failure”, “Inert gas blower fan failure”, and “Insufficient pressure during operation” from the hardware component. The methodology enhances predictive accuracy and provides actionable strategies for mitigating risks in increasingly automated maritime operations. The research outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights for maritime safety managers, safety inspectors, technical inspectors, HSEQ managers, and ship crews to improve operational safety as well as prevent potential risks for inert gas incidents on-board oil tankers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025008695\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025008695","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Probabilistic risk assessment for inert gas system on oil tanker ships using system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN)
As shipboard systems increasingly prioritize automation over human intervention, risk assessment models must adapt to this paradigm shift. The proposed framework addresses this need by focusing on software, hardware, and external factors including human factors, aligning with modern technological dependencies. This research conducts an extensive risk analysis of the inert gas system (IGS) on oil tankers by adopting system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). While the STAMP identifies failure scenarios through a hierarchical control and feedback structure, BBN quantifies the failure probabilities based on STAMP outcomes. The study identifies critical failure pathways through STAMP’s systemic hazard analysis and BBN’s probabilistic quantification and calculates the system failure probability as 1.29E-01. The results indicate that the most critical failures in IGS are “Flame instability or burner failure”, “Inert gas blower fan failure”, and “Insufficient pressure during operation” from the hardware component. The methodology enhances predictive accuracy and provides actionable strategies for mitigating risks in increasingly automated maritime operations. The research outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights for maritime safety managers, safety inspectors, technical inspectors, HSEQ managers, and ship crews to improve operational safety as well as prevent potential risks for inert gas incidents on-board oil tankers.
期刊介绍:
Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.