基于系统理论事故模型与过程(STAMP)和贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)的油轮惰性气体系统概率风险评估

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Bulut Ozan Ceylan , Gizem Elidolu , Sukru Ilke Sezer , Emre Akyuz , Zaili Yang
{"title":"基于系统理论事故模型与过程(STAMP)和贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)的油轮惰性气体系统概率风险评估","authors":"Bulut Ozan Ceylan ,&nbsp;Gizem Elidolu ,&nbsp;Sukru Ilke Sezer ,&nbsp;Emre Akyuz ,&nbsp;Zaili Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As shipboard systems increasingly prioritize automation over human intervention, risk assessment models must adapt to this paradigm shift. The proposed framework addresses this need by focusing on software, hardware, and external factors including human factors, aligning with modern technological dependencies. This research conducts an extensive risk analysis of the inert gas system (IGS) on oil tankers by adopting system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). While the STAMP identifies failure scenarios through a hierarchical control and feedback structure, BBN quantifies the failure probabilities based on STAMP outcomes. The study identifies critical failure pathways through STAMP’s systemic hazard analysis and BBN’s probabilistic quantification and calculates the system failure probability as 1.29E-01. The results indicate that the most critical failures in IGS are “Flame instability or burner failure”, “Inert gas blower fan failure”, and “Insufficient pressure during operation” from the hardware component. The methodology enhances predictive accuracy and provides actionable strategies for mitigating risks in increasingly automated maritime operations. The research outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights for maritime safety managers, safety inspectors, technical inspectors, HSEQ managers, and ship crews to improve operational safety as well as prevent potential risks for inert gas incidents on-board oil tankers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 111669"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic risk assessment for inert gas system on oil tanker ships using system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN)\",\"authors\":\"Bulut Ozan Ceylan ,&nbsp;Gizem Elidolu ,&nbsp;Sukru Ilke Sezer ,&nbsp;Emre Akyuz ,&nbsp;Zaili Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As shipboard systems increasingly prioritize automation over human intervention, risk assessment models must adapt to this paradigm shift. The proposed framework addresses this need by focusing on software, hardware, and external factors including human factors, aligning with modern technological dependencies. This research conducts an extensive risk analysis of the inert gas system (IGS) on oil tankers by adopting system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). While the STAMP identifies failure scenarios through a hierarchical control and feedback structure, BBN quantifies the failure probabilities based on STAMP outcomes. The study identifies critical failure pathways through STAMP’s systemic hazard analysis and BBN’s probabilistic quantification and calculates the system failure probability as 1.29E-01. The results indicate that the most critical failures in IGS are “Flame instability or burner failure”, “Inert gas blower fan failure”, and “Insufficient pressure during operation” from the hardware component. The methodology enhances predictive accuracy and provides actionable strategies for mitigating risks in increasingly automated maritime operations. The research outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights for maritime safety managers, safety inspectors, technical inspectors, HSEQ managers, and ship crews to improve operational safety as well as prevent potential risks for inert gas incidents on-board oil tankers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025008695\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025008695","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着船舶系统越来越重视自动化而不是人为干预,风险评估模型必须适应这种范式转变。提议的框架通过关注软件、硬件和外部因素(包括人为因素)来解决这一需求,并与现代技术依赖关系保持一致。本研究采用系统理论事故模型与过程(STAMP)和贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)对油轮惰性气体系统(IGS)进行了广泛的风险分析。STAMP通过分层控制和反馈结构识别故障场景,而BBN根据STAMP结果量化故障概率。本研究通过STAMP的系统危害分析和BBN的概率量化,识别出关键失效路径,计算出系统失效概率为1.29E-01。结果表明,IGS中最关键的故障是来自硬件部件的“火焰不稳定或燃烧器故障”、“惰性气体鼓风机故障”和“运行压力不足”。该方法提高了预测的准确性,并为日益自动化的海上作业提供了可操作的策略,以降低风险。研究结果有望为海上安全管理人员、安全检查员、技术检查员、HSEQ管理人员和船员提供有价值的见解,以提高操作安全性,并预防油轮上惰性气体事故的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic risk assessment for inert gas system on oil tanker ships using system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN)
As shipboard systems increasingly prioritize automation over human intervention, risk assessment models must adapt to this paradigm shift. The proposed framework addresses this need by focusing on software, hardware, and external factors including human factors, aligning with modern technological dependencies. This research conducts an extensive risk analysis of the inert gas system (IGS) on oil tankers by adopting system theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) and Bayesian belief network (BBN). While the STAMP identifies failure scenarios through a hierarchical control and feedback structure, BBN quantifies the failure probabilities based on STAMP outcomes. The study identifies critical failure pathways through STAMP’s systemic hazard analysis and BBN’s probabilistic quantification and calculates the system failure probability as 1.29E-01. The results indicate that the most critical failures in IGS are “Flame instability or burner failure”, “Inert gas blower fan failure”, and “Insufficient pressure during operation” from the hardware component. The methodology enhances predictive accuracy and provides actionable strategies for mitigating risks in increasingly automated maritime operations. The research outcomes are expected to provide valuable insights for maritime safety managers, safety inspectors, technical inspectors, HSEQ managers, and ship crews to improve operational safety as well as prevent potential risks for inert gas incidents on-board oil tankers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信