Syed Y. Mahdi , Mohammed Alhaji Mohammed , Ismail M. Budaiwi , Adel A. Abdou
{"title":"具有集成气流几何形状的节能窗户的潜力,可改善热舒适和能源效率","authors":"Syed Y. Mahdi , Mohammed Alhaji Mohammed , Ismail M. Budaiwi , Adel A. Abdou","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing building envelope systems is essential for improving energy efficiency and indoor thermal comfort, especially in hot climates with high cooling demand. This study evaluates the performance of an Energy-Active Window (EAW) system enhanced with internal airflow-modifying elements. Return air temperature (outflow), outflow–inflow temperature difference (ΔT), and inner glazing temperature were extracted from CFD steady-state simulations, while whole-building energy demand and occupant comfort were assessed via EnergyPlus using the Fanger PMV model. Optimized EAW configurations were compared to a base case and conventional glazing systems, including double, triple, and Low-E glazing. The square bar design (SA<sub>2</sub>), with three bars spaced 0.1 m apart in the outflow slot, showed the best performance, achieving a return air temperature of 39.04 °C and a ΔT of 16.06 °C. Reducing bar spacing to 0.05 m further improved ΔT to 16.45 °C, lowered the inner glazing temperature to 23.3 °C, and reduced the U-value to 0.12 W/m<sup>2</sup>·K. The optimized EAW reduced cooling demand by 24 % compared to double glazing, 18 % versus triple glazing, 14 % versus double Low-E, and 11 % versus triple Low-E, and 6.16 % over its base case. Comfort analysis confirmed better PMV values (–0.10, 0.07, 0.53) compared to more negative values (–1.46 in double glazing and –1.44 in triple glazing) in conventional systems. These findings identify the SA<sub>2</sub> configuration as a promising strategy for enhancing both energy performance and thermal comfort in energy-active window systems, while demonstrating a competitive advantage over conventional and Low-E glazing technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 116567"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potentials of energy-active windows with integrated airflow geometries for improved thermal comfort and energy efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Syed Y. Mahdi , Mohammed Alhaji Mohammed , Ismail M. Budaiwi , Adel A. Abdou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Optimizing building envelope systems is essential for improving energy efficiency and indoor thermal comfort, especially in hot climates with high cooling demand. This study evaluates the performance of an Energy-Active Window (EAW) system enhanced with internal airflow-modifying elements. Return air temperature (outflow), outflow–inflow temperature difference (ΔT), and inner glazing temperature were extracted from CFD steady-state simulations, while whole-building energy demand and occupant comfort were assessed via EnergyPlus using the Fanger PMV model. Optimized EAW configurations were compared to a base case and conventional glazing systems, including double, triple, and Low-E glazing. The square bar design (SA<sub>2</sub>), with three bars spaced 0.1 m apart in the outflow slot, showed the best performance, achieving a return air temperature of 39.04 °C and a ΔT of 16.06 °C. Reducing bar spacing to 0.05 m further improved ΔT to 16.45 °C, lowered the inner glazing temperature to 23.3 °C, and reduced the U-value to 0.12 W/m<sup>2</sup>·K. The optimized EAW reduced cooling demand by 24 % compared to double glazing, 18 % versus triple glazing, 14 % versus double Low-E, and 11 % versus triple Low-E, and 6.16 % over its base case. Comfort analysis confirmed better PMV values (–0.10, 0.07, 0.53) compared to more negative values (–1.46 in double glazing and –1.44 in triple glazing) in conventional systems. These findings identify the SA<sub>2</sub> configuration as a promising strategy for enhancing both energy performance and thermal comfort in energy-active window systems, while demonstrating a competitive advantage over conventional and Low-E glazing technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"349 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825012976\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825012976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potentials of energy-active windows with integrated airflow geometries for improved thermal comfort and energy efficiency
Optimizing building envelope systems is essential for improving energy efficiency and indoor thermal comfort, especially in hot climates with high cooling demand. This study evaluates the performance of an Energy-Active Window (EAW) system enhanced with internal airflow-modifying elements. Return air temperature (outflow), outflow–inflow temperature difference (ΔT), and inner glazing temperature were extracted from CFD steady-state simulations, while whole-building energy demand and occupant comfort were assessed via EnergyPlus using the Fanger PMV model. Optimized EAW configurations were compared to a base case and conventional glazing systems, including double, triple, and Low-E glazing. The square bar design (SA2), with three bars spaced 0.1 m apart in the outflow slot, showed the best performance, achieving a return air temperature of 39.04 °C and a ΔT of 16.06 °C. Reducing bar spacing to 0.05 m further improved ΔT to 16.45 °C, lowered the inner glazing temperature to 23.3 °C, and reduced the U-value to 0.12 W/m2·K. The optimized EAW reduced cooling demand by 24 % compared to double glazing, 18 % versus triple glazing, 14 % versus double Low-E, and 11 % versus triple Low-E, and 6.16 % over its base case. Comfort analysis confirmed better PMV values (–0.10, 0.07, 0.53) compared to more negative values (–1.46 in double glazing and –1.44 in triple glazing) in conventional systems. These findings identify the SA2 configuration as a promising strategy for enhancing both energy performance and thermal comfort in energy-active window systems, while demonstrating a competitive advantage over conventional and Low-E glazing technologies.
期刊介绍:
An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings
Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.