非英语词嵌入和语言模型的偏见检测方法的系统综述

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Alexandre Puttick, Catherine Ikae, Carlotta Rigotti, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Mark W. Kharas, Roger A. Søraa, Mascha Kurpicz-Briki
{"title":"非英语词嵌入和语言模型的偏见检测方法的系统综述","authors":"Alexandre Puttick,&nbsp;Catherine Ikae,&nbsp;Carlotta Rigotti,&nbsp;Eduard Fosch-Villaronga,&nbsp;Mark W. Kharas,&nbsp;Roger A. Søraa,&nbsp;Mascha Kurpicz-Briki","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11375-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biases in applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence are a major limitation of these applications. Stereotypes of the society are reflected in different types of applications, including image generation, machine translation or CV ranking. This is in particular also the case for language models and word embeddings, encoding human language as mathematical vectors. Research addressing the challenging problem of detection (and mitigation) of the bias in these embeddings is often conducted for the English language. However, the stereotypes encoded can be language dependent and impacted by a cultural environment. Thus, dedicated research efforts for languages other than English are required. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review to identify and compare existing bias detection methods for non-English word embeddings and language models. In an interdisciplinary team we examine the technical aspects, as well as the definitions of bias used by researchers in the field. Based on our findings, we outline a research plan for making bias detection in the field of NLP more inclusive for languages other than English.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11375-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of bias detection methods for non-English word embeddings and language models\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Puttick,&nbsp;Catherine Ikae,&nbsp;Carlotta Rigotti,&nbsp;Eduard Fosch-Villaronga,&nbsp;Mark W. Kharas,&nbsp;Roger A. Søraa,&nbsp;Mascha Kurpicz-Briki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-025-11375-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Biases in applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence are a major limitation of these applications. Stereotypes of the society are reflected in different types of applications, including image generation, machine translation or CV ranking. This is in particular also the case for language models and word embeddings, encoding human language as mathematical vectors. Research addressing the challenging problem of detection (and mitigation) of the bias in these embeddings is often conducted for the English language. However, the stereotypes encoded can be language dependent and impacted by a cultural environment. Thus, dedicated research efforts for languages other than English are required. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review to identify and compare existing bias detection methods for non-English word embeddings and language models. In an interdisciplinary team we examine the technical aspects, as well as the definitions of bias used by researchers in the field. Based on our findings, we outline a research plan for making bias detection in the field of NLP more inclusive for languages other than English.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11375-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11375-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11375-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习和人工智能应用中的偏差是这些应用的主要限制。社会的刻板印象反映在不同类型的应用程序中,包括图像生成、机器翻译或简历排名。对于语言模型和词嵌入来说尤其如此,它们将人类语言编码为数学向量。针对这些嵌入中的偏见检测(和缓解)这一具有挑战性的问题的研究通常是针对英语语言进行的。然而,编码的刻板印象可能依赖于语言,并受到文化环境的影响。因此,需要对英语以外的语言进行专门的研究。在本文中,我们进行了系统的文献综述,以识别和比较现有的非英语单词嵌入和语言模型的偏见检测方法。在一个跨学科的团队中,我们检查技术方面,以及该领域研究人员使用的偏见定义。基于我们的发现,我们概述了一个研究计划,使NLP领域的偏见检测对英语以外的语言更具包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of bias detection methods for non-English word embeddings and language models

Biases in applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence are a major limitation of these applications. Stereotypes of the society are reflected in different types of applications, including image generation, machine translation or CV ranking. This is in particular also the case for language models and word embeddings, encoding human language as mathematical vectors. Research addressing the challenging problem of detection (and mitigation) of the bias in these embeddings is often conducted for the English language. However, the stereotypes encoded can be language dependent and impacted by a cultural environment. Thus, dedicated research efforts for languages other than English are required. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review to identify and compare existing bias detection methods for non-English word embeddings and language models. In an interdisciplinary team we examine the technical aspects, as well as the definitions of bias used by researchers in the field. Based on our findings, we outline a research plan for making bias detection in the field of NLP more inclusive for languages other than English.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信