阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(FLOW):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量测定的2期试验

Winfried Randerath, Ludger Grote, Kaj Stenlöf, Ingo Fietze, Julia Chevts, Erik Buntinx, Javier Albares, Katrin Kuhn, Corinna Hansen, Andreas Völp, Jan Hedner
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(FLOW):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量测定的2期试验","authors":"Winfried Randerath, Ludger Grote, Kaj Stenlöf, Ingo Fietze, Julia Chevts, Erik Buntinx, Javier Albares, Katrin Kuhn, Corinna Hansen, Andreas Völp, Jan Hedner","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01196-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent but approved pharmacological treatment options are missing. Sultiame improves the ventilatory response and upper airway muscle activity by inhibiting carbonic anhydrase. This study aimed to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of three dosages of sultiame in OSA.<h3>Methods</h3>This multicentre, randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial was performed at 28 hospitals and community-based sites in five European countries. Adults (aged 18–75 years) with untreated, moderate to severe OSA and an Apnoea–Hypopnea Index (AHI) of ≥15 to ≤50 events per h were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using interactive response technology, to receive placebo or sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg tablets of identical appearance once per day at bedtime for 15 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline AHI3a. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was the relative change of AHI3a from baseline to week 15 (scheduled treatment end). All participants who were randomly assigned were included in the primary efficacy analysis using an estimands framework and in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2021–002926–26) and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT05236842</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>) and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Dec 2, 2021, and April 8, 2023, 535 patients were screened and 298 were randomly assigned to placebo (n=75), or sultiame 100 mg (n=74), 200 mg (n=74), or 300 mg (n=75). 240 patients completed 15 weeks of treatment. 220 (74%) of 298 participants were male and 78 (26%) were female. In the full analysis set, placebo-subtracted relative AHI3a adjusted means change at week 15 was –16·4% (95% CI –31·3 to –1·4; p=0·032), –30·2% (–45·4 to –15·1; p&lt;0·0001), and 34·6% (–49·1 to –20·0; p&lt;0·0001) for sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg, respectively. The incidence of adverse events increased dose-dependently: 46 (61%) of 75 patients in the placebo group, 54 (73%) of 74 in the 100 mg group, 62 (84%) of 74 in the 200 mg group, and 68 (91%) of 75 in the 300 mg group. Events reported in more than 10% of patients in the placebo, 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg groups were paraesthesia (seven [9%] of 75, 16 [22%] of 74, 32 [43%] of 74, 43 [57%] of 75), headache (six [8%], five [7%], 12 [16%], 11 [15%]), COVID-19 (three [4%], three [4%], six [8%], ten [13%]), and nasopharyngitis (nine [12%], three [4%], seven [9%], seven [9%]).<h3>Interpretation</h3>Sultiame caused consistent, dose-dependent improvements of OSA, nocturnal hypoxia, sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness. These findings offer perspectives for a pharmaceutical approach to treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.<h3>Funding</h3>Desitin Arzneimittel.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sultiame once per day in obstructive sleep apnoea (FLOW): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial\",\"authors\":\"Winfried Randerath, Ludger Grote, Kaj Stenlöf, Ingo Fietze, Julia Chevts, Erik Buntinx, Javier Albares, Katrin Kuhn, Corinna Hansen, Andreas Völp, Jan Hedner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01196-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent but approved pharmacological treatment options are missing. Sultiame improves the ventilatory response and upper airway muscle activity by inhibiting carbonic anhydrase. This study aimed to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of three dosages of sultiame in OSA.<h3>Methods</h3>This multicentre, randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial was performed at 28 hospitals and community-based sites in five European countries. Adults (aged 18–75 years) with untreated, moderate to severe OSA and an Apnoea–Hypopnea Index (AHI) of ≥15 to ≤50 events per h were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using interactive response technology, to receive placebo or sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg tablets of identical appearance once per day at bedtime for 15 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline AHI3a. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was the relative change of AHI3a from baseline to week 15 (scheduled treatment end). All participants who were randomly assigned were included in the primary efficacy analysis using an estimands framework and in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2021–002926–26) and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT05236842</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>) and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Dec 2, 2021, and April 8, 2023, 535 patients were screened and 298 were randomly assigned to placebo (n=75), or sultiame 100 mg (n=74), 200 mg (n=74), or 300 mg (n=75). 240 patients completed 15 weeks of treatment. 220 (74%) of 298 participants were male and 78 (26%) were female. In the full analysis set, placebo-subtracted relative AHI3a adjusted means change at week 15 was –16·4% (95% CI –31·3 to –1·4; p=0·032), –30·2% (–45·4 to –15·1; p&lt;0·0001), and 34·6% (–49·1 to –20·0; p&lt;0·0001) for sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg, respectively. The incidence of adverse events increased dose-dependently: 46 (61%) of 75 patients in the placebo group, 54 (73%) of 74 in the 100 mg group, 62 (84%) of 74 in the 200 mg group, and 68 (91%) of 75 in the 300 mg group. Events reported in more than 10% of patients in the placebo, 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg groups were paraesthesia (seven [9%] of 75, 16 [22%] of 74, 32 [43%] of 74, 43 [57%] of 75), headache (six [8%], five [7%], 12 [16%], 11 [15%]), COVID-19 (three [4%], three [4%], six [8%], ten [13%]), and nasopharyngitis (nine [12%], three [4%], seven [9%], seven [9%]).<h3>Interpretation</h3>Sultiame caused consistent, dose-dependent improvements of OSA, nocturnal hypoxia, sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness. These findings offer perspectives for a pharmaceutical approach to treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.<h3>Funding</h3>Desitin Arzneimittel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01196-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01196-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)非常普遍,但缺乏经批准的药物治疗方案。磺胺可通过抑制碳酸酐酶改善呼吸反应和上呼吸道肌肉活动。本研究旨在前瞻性评价三种剂量的舒硫胺治疗OSA的疗效和安全性。方法这项多中心、随机、平行、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量测定的二期试验在欧洲5个国家的28家医院和社区进行。未经治疗、中度至重度OSA且呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)≥15至≤50事件/小时的成人(18-75岁)随机分配(1:1:1:1:1),使用交互反应技术,每天睡前一次服用外观相同的安慰剂或舒硫胺100 mg、200 mg或300 mg片剂,持续15周。随机化按基线AHI3a分层。疗效的主要指标是AHI3a从基线到第15周(计划治疗结束)的相对变化。所有随机分配的参与者都被纳入使用估计框架的主要疗效分析和安全性分析。该试验已在EudraCT(2021-002926-26)和ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05236842)注册并已完成。在2021年12月2日至2023年4月8日期间,对535名患者进行了筛查,其中298名患者被随机分配到安慰剂组(n=75),或sultiame 100 mg (n=74)、200 mg (n=74)或300 mg (n=75)。240名患者完成了15周的治疗。298名参与者中有220名(74%)是男性,78名(26%)是女性。在完整的分析集中,安慰剂减去相对AHI3a调整后第15周的平均变化分别为- 16.4% (95% CI为- 33.1至- 1.4;p= 0.032), - 30.2%(- 45.4至- 15.1;p< 0.0001)和34.6%(- 49.1至- 20.0;p< 0.0001),分别为sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg和300 mg。不良事件发生率呈剂量依赖性增加:75例患者中安慰剂组46例(61%),74例患者中100 mg组54例(73%),74例患者中200 mg组62例(84%),75例患者中300 mg组68例(91%)。在安慰剂、100mg、200mg或300mg组中,超过10%的患者报告的事件是感觉异常(75例中有7例[9%]、74例中有16例[22%]、74例中有32例[43%]、75例中有43例[57%])、头痛(6例[8%]、5例[7%]、12例[16%]、11例[15%])、COVID-19(3例[4%]、3例[4%]、6例[8%]、10例[13%])和鼻咽炎(9例[12%]、3例[4%]、7例[9%]、7例[9%]、7例[9%])。磺胺引起持续的、剂量依赖性的OSA、夜间缺氧、睡眠质量和日间过度嗜睡的改善。这些发现为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的药物治疗提供了新的视角。FundingDesitin Arzneimittel。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sultiame once per day in obstructive sleep apnoea (FLOW): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial

Background

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent but approved pharmacological treatment options are missing. Sultiame improves the ventilatory response and upper airway muscle activity by inhibiting carbonic anhydrase. This study aimed to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of three dosages of sultiame in OSA.

Methods

This multicentre, randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial was performed at 28 hospitals and community-based sites in five European countries. Adults (aged 18–75 years) with untreated, moderate to severe OSA and an Apnoea–Hypopnea Index (AHI) of ≥15 to ≤50 events per h were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using interactive response technology, to receive placebo or sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg tablets of identical appearance once per day at bedtime for 15 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline AHI3a. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was the relative change of AHI3a from baseline to week 15 (scheduled treatment end). All participants who were randomly assigned were included in the primary efficacy analysis using an estimands framework and in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2021–002926–26) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05236842) and is complete.

Findings

Between Dec 2, 2021, and April 8, 2023, 535 patients were screened and 298 were randomly assigned to placebo (n=75), or sultiame 100 mg (n=74), 200 mg (n=74), or 300 mg (n=75). 240 patients completed 15 weeks of treatment. 220 (74%) of 298 participants were male and 78 (26%) were female. In the full analysis set, placebo-subtracted relative AHI3a adjusted means change at week 15 was –16·4% (95% CI –31·3 to –1·4; p=0·032), –30·2% (–45·4 to –15·1; p<0·0001), and 34·6% (–49·1 to –20·0; p<0·0001) for sultiame 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg, respectively. The incidence of adverse events increased dose-dependently: 46 (61%) of 75 patients in the placebo group, 54 (73%) of 74 in the 100 mg group, 62 (84%) of 74 in the 200 mg group, and 68 (91%) of 75 in the 300 mg group. Events reported in more than 10% of patients in the placebo, 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg groups were paraesthesia (seven [9%] of 75, 16 [22%] of 74, 32 [43%] of 74, 43 [57%] of 75), headache (six [8%], five [7%], 12 [16%], 11 [15%]), COVID-19 (three [4%], three [4%], six [8%], ten [13%]), and nasopharyngitis (nine [12%], three [4%], seven [9%], seven [9%]).

Interpretation

Sultiame caused consistent, dose-dependent improvements of OSA, nocturnal hypoxia, sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness. These findings offer perspectives for a pharmaceutical approach to treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Funding

Desitin Arzneimittel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信