Ning Ma,Manyu Li,Xiaotian Hao,Alimire Abulikemu,Zeyu Song,Pengfei Wang,Liang Li,Haiwei Zhou
{"title":"影响体外诊断HBV DNA参比物数字PCR定量准确性的关键因素","authors":"Ning Ma,Manyu Li,Xiaotian Hao,Alimire Abulikemu,Zeyu Song,Pengfei Wang,Liang Li,Haiwei Zhou","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Ma,Manyu Li,Xiaotian Hao,Alimire Abulikemu,Zeyu Song,Pengfei Wang,Liang Li,Haiwei Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics.
Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.