影响体外诊断HBV DNA参比物数字PCR定量准确性的关键因素

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ning Ma,Manyu Li,Xiaotian Hao,Alimire Abulikemu,Zeyu Song,Pengfei Wang,Liang Li,Haiwei Zhou
{"title":"影响体外诊断HBV DNA参比物数字PCR定量准确性的关键因素","authors":"Ning Ma,Manyu Li,Xiaotian Hao,Alimire Abulikemu,Zeyu Song,Pengfei Wang,Liang Li,Haiwei Zhou","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Ma,Manyu Li,Xiaotian Hao,Alimire Abulikemu,Zeyu Song,Pengfei Wang,Liang Li,Haiwei Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字PCR作为一种先进的核酸绝对定量技术,已广泛应用于包括体外诊断标准品在内的标准物质的值赋值和鉴定。然而,很少有研究系统地评估不同数字PCR平台和核酸提取试剂盒对标准物质定量的影响。在本研究中,我们建立了一种高特异性、高重复性的乙型肝炎病毒数字PCR检测方法,并系统评估了商用数字PCR平台、引物探针试剂盒和核酸提取试剂盒对参比物定量的影响。结果表明,基于不同技术原理的主流商业数字PCR平台的定量测量结果具有良好的一致性,平均平台间变异系数(CV)为9.05%。值得注意的是,核酸提取效率对定量准确性的影响最大,不同提取试剂盒的平均变异系数为76.66%。引物-探针设计对测量不确定度也有很大影响。这些发现提供了重要的见解,支持标准物质定量的数字PCR方案的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Factors Affecting Digital PCR Quantification Accuracy in HBV DNA Reference Material for In Vitro Diagnostics.
Digital PCR, as an advanced technique for absolute nucleic acid quantification, has been widely used in the value assignment and characterization of reference materials, including in vitro diagnostic reference standards. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of different digital PCR platforms and nucleic acid extraction kits on the quantification of reference materials. In this study, we established a highly specific and reproducible digital PCR assay for the hepatitis B virus and systematically evaluated the influences of commercial digital PCR platforms, primer-probe sets, and nucleic acid extraction kits on reference materials quantification. Results demonstrated good consistency in quantitative measurements across mainstream commercial digital PCR platforms based on different technical principles, with a mean interplatform coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.05%. Notably, nucleic acid extraction efficiency demonstrated the greatest impact on quantification accuracy, with a mean CV across different extraction kits of 76.66%. Primer-probe design also contributed substantially to the measurement uncertainty. These findings provide important insights that support the standardization of digital PCR protocols for reference materials quantification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信