瑞典脑瘫儿童和青少年的认知功能。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ann I Alriksson-Schmidt, Barbro Lindquist, Maja J Knudsen, Pia Ödman, Åsa Korsfeldt, Kristine Stadskleiv
{"title":"瑞典脑瘫儿童和青少年的认知功能。","authors":"Ann I Alriksson-Schmidt, Barbro Lindquist, Maja J Knudsen, Pia Ödman, Åsa Korsfeldt, Kristine Stadskleiv","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2025.2566090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognition in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is often affected. How cognition differs by functional level and subtype is not clear, and the effects of adapted response modes need investigation. In this study, the aims were to investigate how many psychologists reported that interpreters and/or augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) were used, how many assessments were adapted, if there were clinical characteristics associated with whom had been assessed, and to delineate scores from the Wechsler scales with CP by sex, subtype, gross motor function (GMFCS), manual abilities (MACS), and communication level (CFCS). This was a Swedish register study that included two cohorts of children with CP. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III/IV) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV/V) served as dependent variables. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and multiple regressions were performed. Interpreters and AAC were used in 5% and 13% of the assessments, respectively. Adapted assessments were associated with lower verbal intelligence (VIQ), performance intelligence (PIQ), and full-scale intelligence (FSIQ) mean scores. Assessment practices were associated with GMFCS, MACS, and subtype. Age was negatively associated with PIQ and FSIQ. Children with spastic unilateral CP scored higher than children with ataxic CP on VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ. Mean scores were significantly different across MACS levels. Children with less affected gross motor, manual, and communication functioning and those with spastic CP were more likely to be assessed. Irrespective of subtype, GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS levels, the ranges of scores were wide, highlighting the great heterogeneity of cognition in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy living in Sweden.\",\"authors\":\"Ann I Alriksson-Schmidt, Barbro Lindquist, Maja J Knudsen, Pia Ödman, Åsa Korsfeldt, Kristine Stadskleiv\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09297049.2025.2566090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognition in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is often affected. How cognition differs by functional level and subtype is not clear, and the effects of adapted response modes need investigation. In this study, the aims were to investigate how many psychologists reported that interpreters and/or augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) were used, how many assessments were adapted, if there were clinical characteristics associated with whom had been assessed, and to delineate scores from the Wechsler scales with CP by sex, subtype, gross motor function (GMFCS), manual abilities (MACS), and communication level (CFCS). This was a Swedish register study that included two cohorts of children with CP. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III/IV) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV/V) served as dependent variables. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and multiple regressions were performed. Interpreters and AAC were used in 5% and 13% of the assessments, respectively. Adapted assessments were associated with lower verbal intelligence (VIQ), performance intelligence (PIQ), and full-scale intelligence (FSIQ) mean scores. Assessment practices were associated with GMFCS, MACS, and subtype. Age was negatively associated with PIQ and FSIQ. Children with spastic unilateral CP scored higher than children with ataxic CP on VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ. Mean scores were significantly different across MACS levels. Children with less affected gross motor, manual, and communication functioning and those with spastic CP were more likely to be assessed. Irrespective of subtype, GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS levels, the ranges of scores were wide, highlighting the great heterogeneity of cognition in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2025.2566090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2025.2566090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑瘫儿童的认知能力经常受到影响。认知在功能水平和亚型之间的差异尚不清楚,适应性反应模式的影响需要进一步研究。在这项研究中,目的是调查有多少心理学家报告使用了口译员和/或辅助和替代沟通(AAC),有多少评估被改编,如果有临床特征与被评估的人相关,并根据性别、亚型、大运动功能(GMFCS)、手动能力(MACS)和沟通水平(CFCS)来描绘韦氏量表的CP得分。这是一项瑞典注册研究,包括两个CP儿童队列。韦氏学前和初级智力量表(WPPSI-III/IV)和韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC-IV/V)作为因变量。进行描述性统计、逻辑回归和多元回归分析。口译员和AAC分别在5%和13%的评估中使用。适应性评估与较低的言语智力(VIQ)、表现智力(PIQ)和全面智力(FSIQ)平均得分相关。评估实践与GMFCS、MACS和亚型相关。年龄与PIQ、FSIQ呈负相关。痉挛型单侧脑瘫患儿的VIQ、PIQ和FSIQ得分高于共济失调型脑瘫患儿。不同MACS水平的平均得分有显著差异。大运动、手操作和交流功能不受影响的儿童以及患有痉挛性脑瘫的儿童更有可能接受评估。无论亚型、GMFCS、MACS和CFCS水平如何,得分范围都很广,突出了该人群认知的巨大异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy living in Sweden.

Cognition in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is often affected. How cognition differs by functional level and subtype is not clear, and the effects of adapted response modes need investigation. In this study, the aims were to investigate how many psychologists reported that interpreters and/or augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) were used, how many assessments were adapted, if there were clinical characteristics associated with whom had been assessed, and to delineate scores from the Wechsler scales with CP by sex, subtype, gross motor function (GMFCS), manual abilities (MACS), and communication level (CFCS). This was a Swedish register study that included two cohorts of children with CP. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III/IV) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV/V) served as dependent variables. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and multiple regressions were performed. Interpreters and AAC were used in 5% and 13% of the assessments, respectively. Adapted assessments were associated with lower verbal intelligence (VIQ), performance intelligence (PIQ), and full-scale intelligence (FSIQ) mean scores. Assessment practices were associated with GMFCS, MACS, and subtype. Age was negatively associated with PIQ and FSIQ. Children with spastic unilateral CP scored higher than children with ataxic CP on VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ. Mean scores were significantly different across MACS levels. Children with less affected gross motor, manual, and communication functioning and those with spastic CP were more likely to be assessed. Irrespective of subtype, GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS levels, the ranges of scores were wide, highlighting the great heterogeneity of cognition in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信