{"title":"技术对视网膜研究人员的影响学习曲线:数字与模拟显微镜的前瞻性研究(BRAVE研究)(连接视网膜研究员与可视化增强的进展)。","authors":"Matias Iglicki, Dinah Zur, Marina Khoury, Roberto Muiños, Javier Ignacio Melamud, Anat Loewenstein","doi":"10.1159/000548785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The BRAVE Study (Bridging Retina Fellows' Advancement with Visualization Enhancements) aims to compare the learning curves of retina fellows performing epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery trained using digital heads-up display (HUD) systems versus analog surgical operating microscopes (SOMs) in a prospective manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective two-year study, four retina fellows were trained exclusively with either a digital (NGENUITY® 3D) or analog (ZEISS OPMI LUMERA 700) microscope. Each fellow performed 127 ERM surgeries (total: 508). Learning progression was rated using an 18-item Likert scale (1-5; higher scores = greater difficulty). Primary outcomes included visualization quality, surgical comfort, and instructor interaction. A linear regression model assessed learning trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fellows using the digital system achieved proficiency within three months, compared to seven months for the analog group. Initial difficulty scores were significantly lower in the digital group (1.64 vs. 5.14, p<0.001). Monthly improvement rates were -0.30 (digital) vs. -0.86 (analog). Instructor interventions were higher in the analog group during the first six months (p<0.05) but equalized later. Early ergonomic and comfort advantages with digital systems also leveled over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital HUD systems enhance early skill acquisition and reduce learning-related challenges in retina fellow training. Although long-term proficiency equalizes, these systems offer clear early-phase benefits, supporting their integration into surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological Influence on Retina Fellows' Learning Curves: A Prospective Study of Digital vs. Analog Microscopes (The BRAVE Study) (Bridging Retina Fellows' Advancement with Visualization Enhancements).\",\"authors\":\"Matias Iglicki, Dinah Zur, Marina Khoury, Roberto Muiños, Javier Ignacio Melamud, Anat Loewenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The BRAVE Study (Bridging Retina Fellows' Advancement with Visualization Enhancements) aims to compare the learning curves of retina fellows performing epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery trained using digital heads-up display (HUD) systems versus analog surgical operating microscopes (SOMs) in a prospective manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective two-year study, four retina fellows were trained exclusively with either a digital (NGENUITY® 3D) or analog (ZEISS OPMI LUMERA 700) microscope. Each fellow performed 127 ERM surgeries (total: 508). Learning progression was rated using an 18-item Likert scale (1-5; higher scores = greater difficulty). Primary outcomes included visualization quality, surgical comfort, and instructor interaction. A linear regression model assessed learning trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fellows using the digital system achieved proficiency within three months, compared to seven months for the analog group. Initial difficulty scores were significantly lower in the digital group (1.64 vs. 5.14, p<0.001). Monthly improvement rates were -0.30 (digital) vs. -0.86 (analog). Instructor interventions were higher in the analog group during the first six months (p<0.05) but equalized later. Early ergonomic and comfort advantages with digital systems also leveled over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital HUD systems enhance early skill acquisition and reduce learning-related challenges in retina fellow training. Although long-term proficiency equalizes, these systems offer clear early-phase benefits, supporting their integration into surgical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technological Influence on Retina Fellows' Learning Curves: A Prospective Study of Digital vs. Analog Microscopes (The BRAVE Study) (Bridging Retina Fellows' Advancement with Visualization Enhancements).
Purpose: The BRAVE Study (Bridging Retina Fellows' Advancement with Visualization Enhancements) aims to compare the learning curves of retina fellows performing epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery trained using digital heads-up display (HUD) systems versus analog surgical operating microscopes (SOMs) in a prospective manner.
Methods: In this prospective two-year study, four retina fellows were trained exclusively with either a digital (NGENUITY® 3D) or analog (ZEISS OPMI LUMERA 700) microscope. Each fellow performed 127 ERM surgeries (total: 508). Learning progression was rated using an 18-item Likert scale (1-5; higher scores = greater difficulty). Primary outcomes included visualization quality, surgical comfort, and instructor interaction. A linear regression model assessed learning trends.
Results: Fellows using the digital system achieved proficiency within three months, compared to seven months for the analog group. Initial difficulty scores were significantly lower in the digital group (1.64 vs. 5.14, p<0.001). Monthly improvement rates were -0.30 (digital) vs. -0.86 (analog). Instructor interventions were higher in the analog group during the first six months (p<0.05) but equalized later. Early ergonomic and comfort advantages with digital systems also leveled over time.
Conclusions: Digital HUD systems enhance early skill acquisition and reduce learning-related challenges in retina fellow training. Although long-term proficiency equalizes, these systems offer clear early-phase benefits, supporting their integration into surgical education.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.