孟加拉国高危人群脑瘫的早期发现

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Tasneem Karim, Anna Te Velde, Annabel Webb, Catherine Morgan, Nadia Badawi, Iona Novak, Saifuddin Ahmed, Shafiul Islam, Iskander Hossain, Nazrul Islam, Mohammad Muhit, Gulam Khandaker
{"title":"孟加拉国高危人群脑瘫的早期发现","authors":"Tasneem Karim, Anna Te Velde, Annabel Webb, Catherine Morgan, Nadia Badawi, Iona Novak, Saifuddin Ahmed, Shafiul Islam, Iskander Hossain, Nazrul Islam, Mohammad Muhit, Gulam Khandaker","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictive validity of best practice early detection tools for cerebral palsy (CP) in a high-risk cohort.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective longitudinal cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal intensive care unit of a regional tertiary hospital in Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Neonates with risk factors for CP admitted to Mymensingh Medical College Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between November 2019 and March 2020.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>General Movements Assessment (GMA) at writhing and fidgety periods; Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Second Edition (PDMS-2) conducted in person at 3, 12 and 24 months. The Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC-2), Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) and Developmental Milestones Chart (DMC) were administered remotely at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. Due to the impact of COVID-19, a proportion of the cohort was not able to have GMA fidgety videos completed and the first HINE assessment was delayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 infants were enrolled. Of the surviving infants assessed at 24 months, 36 (29%) had a confirmed diagnosis of CP. The most accurate combination of tools for early detection was GMA and HINE at 3 months (sensitivity 0.91; specificity 1.00). The PDMS-2 Total Motor Quotient, with an optimised cut-off of 59, showed high accuracy at 24 months (sensitivity 0.94; specificity 0.99). Among the tools administered remotely, the DAYC-2 PD, DMC (Gross and Fine Motor domains) and ASQ-3 (Gross and Fine Motor domains) demonstrated strong predictive validity-both individually and in combination-at 9, 12, 18 and 24 months, supporting their use as practical alternatives when in-person assessments are not feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite pandemic-related disruptions, an accurate diagnosis was possible as early as 3 months of age using the best practice tools. Our findings support the practicability of scalable early detection models integrating in-person and remote assessments to improve access to timely diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early detection of cerebral palsy among a high-risk cohort in Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Tasneem Karim, Anna Te Velde, Annabel Webb, Catherine Morgan, Nadia Badawi, Iona Novak, Saifuddin Ahmed, Shafiul Islam, Iskander Hossain, Nazrul Islam, Mohammad Muhit, Gulam Khandaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictive validity of best practice early detection tools for cerebral palsy (CP) in a high-risk cohort.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective longitudinal cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal intensive care unit of a regional tertiary hospital in Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Neonates with risk factors for CP admitted to Mymensingh Medical College Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between November 2019 and March 2020.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>General Movements Assessment (GMA) at writhing and fidgety periods; Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Second Edition (PDMS-2) conducted in person at 3, 12 and 24 months. The Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC-2), Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) and Developmental Milestones Chart (DMC) were administered remotely at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. Due to the impact of COVID-19, a proportion of the cohort was not able to have GMA fidgety videos completed and the first HINE assessment was delayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 infants were enrolled. Of the surviving infants assessed at 24 months, 36 (29%) had a confirmed diagnosis of CP. The most accurate combination of tools for early detection was GMA and HINE at 3 months (sensitivity 0.91; specificity 1.00). The PDMS-2 Total Motor Quotient, with an optimised cut-off of 59, showed high accuracy at 24 months (sensitivity 0.94; specificity 0.99). Among the tools administered remotely, the DAYC-2 PD, DMC (Gross and Fine Motor domains) and ASQ-3 (Gross and Fine Motor domains) demonstrated strong predictive validity-both individually and in combination-at 9, 12, 18 and 24 months, supporting their use as practical alternatives when in-person assessments are not feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite pandemic-related disruptions, an accurate diagnosis was possible as early as 3 months of age using the best practice tools. Our findings support the practicability of scalable early detection models integrating in-person and remote assessments to improve access to timely diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003921\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价最佳实践早期检测工具对高危人群脑瘫(CP)的预测有效性。研究设计:前瞻性纵向队列研究。环境:孟加拉国一家地区三级医院的新生儿重症监护室。参与者:2019年11月至2020年3月期间在Mymensingh医学院附属医院新生儿重症监护室住院的具有CP危险因素的新生儿。结果测量:扭动和烦躁期的一般运动评估(GMA);哈默史密斯婴儿神经系统检查(HINE)和皮博迪发育运动量表第二版(PDMS-2)在3、12和24个月时进行。在6、9、12、18和24个月时远程进行幼儿发展评估(DAYC-2)、年龄阶段问卷(ASQ-3)和发展里程碑表(DMC)。由于COVID-19的影响,一部分队列无法完成GMA烦躁视频,第一次HINE评估被推迟。结果:共有227名婴儿入组。在24个月时评估的存活婴儿中,36例(29%)确诊为CP。早期检测工具最准确的组合是3个月时的GMA和HINE(敏感性0.91,特异性1.00)。PDMS-2总运动商,优化截止值为59,在24个月时显示出很高的准确性(敏感性0.94,特异性0.99)。在远程管理的工具中,DAYC-2 PD、DMC(粗大和精细运动领域)和ASQ-3(粗大和精细运动领域)在9个月、12个月、18个月和24个月时显示出很强的预测有效性——无论是单独的还是组合的,这支持了它们在面对面评估不可行的情况下作为实际替代方案的使用。结论:尽管存在与大流行相关的干扰,但使用最佳实践工具,早在3个月大时就可以进行准确诊断。我们的研究结果支持可扩展的早期检测模型的实用性,该模型集成了现场和远程评估,以改善及时诊断的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early detection of cerebral palsy among a high-risk cohort in Bangladesh.

Early detection of cerebral palsy among a high-risk cohort in Bangladesh.

Early detection of cerebral palsy among a high-risk cohort in Bangladesh.

Objective: To evaluate the predictive validity of best practice early detection tools for cerebral palsy (CP) in a high-risk cohort.

Study design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit of a regional tertiary hospital in Bangladesh.

Participants: Neonates with risk factors for CP admitted to Mymensingh Medical College Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between November 2019 and March 2020.

Outcome measures: General Movements Assessment (GMA) at writhing and fidgety periods; Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Second Edition (PDMS-2) conducted in person at 3, 12 and 24 months. The Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC-2), Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) and Developmental Milestones Chart (DMC) were administered remotely at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. Due to the impact of COVID-19, a proportion of the cohort was not able to have GMA fidgety videos completed and the first HINE assessment was delayed.

Results: A total of 227 infants were enrolled. Of the surviving infants assessed at 24 months, 36 (29%) had a confirmed diagnosis of CP. The most accurate combination of tools for early detection was GMA and HINE at 3 months (sensitivity 0.91; specificity 1.00). The PDMS-2 Total Motor Quotient, with an optimised cut-off of 59, showed high accuracy at 24 months (sensitivity 0.94; specificity 0.99). Among the tools administered remotely, the DAYC-2 PD, DMC (Gross and Fine Motor domains) and ASQ-3 (Gross and Fine Motor domains) demonstrated strong predictive validity-both individually and in combination-at 9, 12, 18 and 24 months, supporting their use as practical alternatives when in-person assessments are not feasible.

Conclusions: Despite pandemic-related disruptions, an accurate diagnosis was possible as early as 3 months of age using the best practice tools. Our findings support the practicability of scalable early detection models integrating in-person and remote assessments to improve access to timely diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信