以商定的方法调查发育倒退儿童。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Kirsten Furley, Matthew Hunter, Gauravi Gawade, Michael Absoud, Chirag Mehra, Robin Kochel, Michael Collingwood Fahey, Katrina Williams
{"title":"以商定的方法调查发育倒退儿童。","authors":"Kirsten Furley, Matthew Hunter, Gauravi Gawade, Michael Absoud, Chirag Mehra, Robin Kochel, Michael Collingwood Fahey, Katrina Williams","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Children presenting with developmental regression are inconsistently investigated, leading to unacceptable delays to diagnosis for some children. This study sought global expert opinion to develop an agreed approach to investigate children presenting with developmental regression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A Delphi survey collected clinician participant choice of investigations in response to case scenarios of children presenting with developmental regression and differing presenting features. Participants responded to two surveys, and consensus was achieved at 70% agreement. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics (number of responses and percentage agreement). Fifty participants completed the first-round survey, and 31 completed round two. Forty-eight percent of participants who completed both rounds had over 20 years of experience in caring for children with developmental regression. They represented four different clinician specialties and worked across five countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each of the four scenarios, there was agreement to recommend haematological, biochemical and genetic investigations as first investigations. Endocrine, metabolic and neurophysiological investigations reached consensus for scenarios based on presentation differences.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Participants agreed on first investigations to recommend for children presenting with developmental regression. This is an important initial step towards an agreed approach to investigate children with developmental regression needed to reduce inconsistencies in current care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an agreed approach to investigate children with developmental regression.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Furley, Matthew Hunter, Gauravi Gawade, Michael Absoud, Chirag Mehra, Robin Kochel, Michael Collingwood Fahey, Katrina Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Children presenting with developmental regression are inconsistently investigated, leading to unacceptable delays to diagnosis for some children. This study sought global expert opinion to develop an agreed approach to investigate children presenting with developmental regression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A Delphi survey collected clinician participant choice of investigations in response to case scenarios of children presenting with developmental regression and differing presenting features. Participants responded to two surveys, and consensus was achieved at 70% agreement. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics (number of responses and percentage agreement). Fifty participants completed the first-round survey, and 31 completed round two. Forty-eight percent of participants who completed both rounds had over 20 years of experience in caring for children with developmental regression. They represented four different clinician specialties and worked across five countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each of the four scenarios, there was agreement to recommend haematological, biochemical and genetic investigations as first investigations. Endocrine, metabolic and neurophysiological investigations reached consensus for scenarios based on presentation differences.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Participants agreed on first investigations to recommend for children presenting with developmental regression. This is an important initial step towards an agreed approach to investigate children with developmental regression needed to reduce inconsistencies in current care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:表现为发育倒退的儿童的调查不一致,导致一些儿童的诊断不可接受的延迟。这项研究寻求全球专家的意见,以制定一种商定的方法来调查出现发育倒退的儿童。方法:采用德尔菲调查法,收集临床医生参与调查的选择,以应对儿童发育倒退的病例情况和不同的表现特征。参与者回答了两个调查,达成了70%的共识。使用描述性统计(应答数和同意百分比)对结果进行分析。50名参与者完成了第一轮调查,31名完成了第二轮调查。在完成两轮测试的参与者中,有48%的人在照顾发育倒退儿童方面有超过20年的经验。他们代表了四个不同的临床医生专业,在五个国家工作。结果:对于四种情况中的每一种,一致建议血液学,生化和遗传调查作为第一调查。内分泌、代谢和神经生理学的研究在表现差异的基础上达成了共识。解释:参与者同意为出现发育倒退的儿童推荐的第一次调查。这是朝着采用商定的方法调查发育倒退儿童迈出的重要的第一步,这种方法需要减少目前护理中的不一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards an agreed approach to investigate children with developmental regression.

Towards an agreed approach to investigate children with developmental regression.

Aim: Children presenting with developmental regression are inconsistently investigated, leading to unacceptable delays to diagnosis for some children. This study sought global expert opinion to develop an agreed approach to investigate children presenting with developmental regression.

Method: A Delphi survey collected clinician participant choice of investigations in response to case scenarios of children presenting with developmental regression and differing presenting features. Participants responded to two surveys, and consensus was achieved at 70% agreement. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics (number of responses and percentage agreement). Fifty participants completed the first-round survey, and 31 completed round two. Forty-eight percent of participants who completed both rounds had over 20 years of experience in caring for children with developmental regression. They represented four different clinician specialties and worked across five countries.

Results: For each of the four scenarios, there was agreement to recommend haematological, biochemical and genetic investigations as first investigations. Endocrine, metabolic and neurophysiological investigations reached consensus for scenarios based on presentation differences.

Interpretation: Participants agreed on first investigations to recommend for children presenting with developmental regression. This is an important initial step towards an agreed approach to investigate children with developmental regression needed to reduce inconsistencies in current care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信