减少数字创业教育的差距:对创新学习策略及其制度影响的系统回顾

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Noptanit Chotisarn , Thadathibesra Phuthong
{"title":"减少数字创业教育的差距:对创新学习策略及其制度影响的系统回顾","authors":"Noptanit Chotisarn ,&nbsp;Thadathibesra Phuthong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review and bibliometric analysis investigated digital transformation in entrepreneurship education using the theories–contexts–methods–antecedents–decisions–outcomes framework. Based on a comprehensive examination of 65 articles published between 2006 and 2025, the study identifies six distinct knowledge clusters: educational technology frameworks, social entrepreneurship ecosystems, educational innovation in higher education, entrepreneurial education and employability, digital knowledge management and entrepreneurial innovation culture. Findings indicate that effective entrepreneurial education in digital contexts depends on the interplay among institutional support, technological infrastructure, pedagogical strategies and contextual relevance. Digital literacy emerges as a foundational competency, with measurable impacts, such as a 2 % reduction in poverty risk for every one-point increase in digital literacy. Experiential and challenge-based learning methods outperform traditional approaches, with simulation-based strategies demonstrating up to a 170 % improvement in entrepreneurial competencies. The study proposes an integrated framework illustrating how institutional factors, technological infrastructure and pedagogical design interact to create effective learning environments for entrepreneurial development. Identified research gaps include longitudinal competency development, cross-cultural effectiveness, emerging technology integration and assessment methodologies, providing a clear agenda for advancing both theoretical insights and practical applications in digital-age entrepreneurship education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"Article 101283"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing gaps in digital entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of innovative learning strategies and their institutional impact\",\"authors\":\"Noptanit Chotisarn ,&nbsp;Thadathibesra Phuthong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This systematic review and bibliometric analysis investigated digital transformation in entrepreneurship education using the theories–contexts–methods–antecedents–decisions–outcomes framework. Based on a comprehensive examination of 65 articles published between 2006 and 2025, the study identifies six distinct knowledge clusters: educational technology frameworks, social entrepreneurship ecosystems, educational innovation in higher education, entrepreneurial education and employability, digital knowledge management and entrepreneurial innovation culture. Findings indicate that effective entrepreneurial education in digital contexts depends on the interplay among institutional support, technological infrastructure, pedagogical strategies and contextual relevance. Digital literacy emerges as a foundational competency, with measurable impacts, such as a 2 % reduction in poverty risk for every one-point increase in digital literacy. Experiential and challenge-based learning methods outperform traditional approaches, with simulation-based strategies demonstrating up to a 170 % improvement in entrepreneurial competencies. The study proposes an integrated framework illustrating how institutional factors, technological infrastructure and pedagogical design interact to create effective learning environments for entrepreneurial development. Identified research gaps include longitudinal competency development, cross-cultural effectiveness, emerging technology integration and assessment methodologies, providing a clear agenda for advancing both theoretical insights and practical applications in digital-age entrepreneurship education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811725001533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811725001533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用理论-背景-方法-前因-决策-结果框架对创业教育中的数字化转型进行了系统回顾和文献计量分析。基于对2006年至2025年间发表的65篇文章的综合分析,该研究确定了六个不同的知识集群:教育技术框架、社会创业生态系统、高等教育中的教育创新、创业教育和就业能力、数字知识管理和创业创新文化。研究结果表明,数字环境下有效的创业教育取决于制度支持、技术基础设施、教学策略和情境相关性之间的相互作用。数字扫盲已成为一项基本能力,其影响是可衡量的,例如,数字扫盲每提高一个百分点,贫困风险就会降低2%。体验式和基于挑战的学习方法优于传统方法,基于模拟的策略在创业能力方面提高了170%。该研究提出了一个综合框架,说明制度因素、技术基础设施和教学设计如何相互作用,为创业发展创造有效的学习环境。已确定的研究差距包括纵向能力发展、跨文化有效性、新兴技术整合和评估方法,为推进数字时代创业教育的理论见解和实际应用提供了明确的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing gaps in digital entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of innovative learning strategies and their institutional impact
This systematic review and bibliometric analysis investigated digital transformation in entrepreneurship education using the theories–contexts–methods–antecedents–decisions–outcomes framework. Based on a comprehensive examination of 65 articles published between 2006 and 2025, the study identifies six distinct knowledge clusters: educational technology frameworks, social entrepreneurship ecosystems, educational innovation in higher education, entrepreneurial education and employability, digital knowledge management and entrepreneurial innovation culture. Findings indicate that effective entrepreneurial education in digital contexts depends on the interplay among institutional support, technological infrastructure, pedagogical strategies and contextual relevance. Digital literacy emerges as a foundational competency, with measurable impacts, such as a 2 % reduction in poverty risk for every one-point increase in digital literacy. Experiential and challenge-based learning methods outperform traditional approaches, with simulation-based strategies demonstrating up to a 170 % improvement in entrepreneurial competencies. The study proposes an integrated framework illustrating how institutional factors, technological infrastructure and pedagogical design interact to create effective learning environments for entrepreneurial development. Identified research gaps include longitudinal competency development, cross-cultural effectiveness, emerging technology integration and assessment methodologies, providing a clear agenda for advancing both theoretical insights and practical applications in digital-age entrepreneurship education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信