预测错误如何驱动记忆更新:蓝斑-海马体相互作用的作用。

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Isabelle Groves, Stephanie L Grella, Carolyn W Harley, Oliver Hardt, Lynn Nadel
{"title":"预测错误如何驱动记忆更新:蓝斑-海马体相互作用的作用。","authors":"Isabelle Groves, Stephanie L Grella, Carolyn W Harley, Oliver Hardt, Lynn Nadel","doi":"10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The brain constantly generates predictions based on one's knowledge of the world, as captured in memory. When these predictions are in error, our knowledge base must be revised to remain relevant. Here, we propose that this error-driven updating of memory depends largely on the interplay between the hippocampus and locus coeruleus (LC), during which the former conveys information about surprise to the latter, signaling the magnitude of prediction error. Small prediction errors promote editing of existing memories, whereas large prediction errors lead to the formation of new episodic memories. We suggest that this memory curation process is central to adaptive behavior, extending classical views on the contributions of the LC to cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":23325,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How prediction error drives memory updating: role of locus coeruleus-hippocampal interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Groves, Stephanie L Grella, Carolyn W Harley, Oliver Hardt, Lynn Nadel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The brain constantly generates predictions based on one's knowledge of the world, as captured in memory. When these predictions are in error, our knowledge base must be revised to remain relevant. Here, we propose that this error-driven updating of memory depends largely on the interplay between the hippocampus and locus coeruleus (LC), during which the former conveys information about surprise to the latter, signaling the magnitude of prediction error. Small prediction errors promote editing of existing memories, whereas large prediction errors lead to the formation of new episodic memories. We suggest that this memory curation process is central to adaptive behavior, extending classical views on the contributions of the LC to cognition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大脑不断地根据一个人对世界的了解(就像记忆中捕获的那样)做出预测。当这些预测是错误的,我们的知识库必须进行修订,以保持相关性。在这里,我们提出这种错误驱动的记忆更新在很大程度上取决于海马体和蓝斑(LC)之间的相互作用,在此过程中,前者向后者传递有关惊喜的信息,并指示预测误差的大小。小的预测错误促进对现有记忆的编辑,而大的预测错误导致新的情景记忆的形成。我们认为,这种记忆管理过程是适应性行为的核心,扩展了经典的关于脑皮层对认知的贡献的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How prediction error drives memory updating: role of locus coeruleus-hippocampal interactions.

The brain constantly generates predictions based on one's knowledge of the world, as captured in memory. When these predictions are in error, our knowledge base must be revised to remain relevant. Here, we propose that this error-driven updating of memory depends largely on the interplay between the hippocampus and locus coeruleus (LC), during which the former conveys information about surprise to the latter, signaling the magnitude of prediction error. Small prediction errors promote editing of existing memories, whereas large prediction errors lead to the formation of new episodic memories. We suggest that this memory curation process is central to adaptive behavior, extending classical views on the contributions of the LC to cognition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Neurosciences
Trends in Neurosciences 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
26.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over four decades, Trends in Neurosciences (TINS) has been a prominent source of inspiring reviews and commentaries across all disciplines of neuroscience. TINS is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, and its articles are curated by the Editor and authored by leading researchers in their respective fields. The journal communicates exciting advances in brain research, serves as a voice for the global neuroscience community, and highlights the contribution of neuroscientific research to medicine and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信