Alice Montelaghi, Andrea Ciorciari, Roberto Roklicer, Gregor Jurak, Attilio Carraro
{"title":"运动中的人工智能:对人工智能驱动的体育活动促进虚拟助手的系统回顾及其与传统策略的比较","authors":"Alice Montelaghi, Andrea Ciorciari, Roberto Roklicer, Gregor Jurak, Attilio Carraro","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11361-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physical inactivity remains a major public health concern globally, prompting the need for scalable, cost-effective interventions. Artificial Intelligence-driven Virtual Assistants (AIVAs) such as chatbots and virtual agents have emerged as novel methods to promote physical activity (PA), yet their effectiveness compared to traditional strategies remains unclear. This systematic review aimed at examining the characteristics, strategies, and effectiveness of AIVAs in promoting PA in adults and to compare them with traditional interventions. A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane was conducted through May 2025. Eight interventional studies that employed AIVAs targeting PA were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Intervention characteristics, outcomes, and behavioral strategies were extracted and synthesized. AIVAs were found to incorporate established behavior change techniques such as goal setting, feedback, and motivational support. Several studies demonstrated positive effects on PA metrics such as step counts and moderate to vigorous PA, though results were heterogeneous. Engagement and usability were generally high, particularly in interventions incorporating relational features. Compared to traditional interventions, AIVAs offered advantages in scalability and user autonomy but often lacked rigorous designs and long-term evaluation. AIVAs show promise as complementary tools for PA promotion, potentially overcoming scalability barriers associated with human-delivered programs. However, future research should prioritize methodologically robust designs, long-term assessments, and hybrid models that integrate both human and AI elements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11361-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI in motion: a systematic review of artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistants for physical activity promotion and their comparison with traditional strategies\",\"authors\":\"Alice Montelaghi, Andrea Ciorciari, Roberto Roklicer, Gregor Jurak, Attilio Carraro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-025-11361-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Physical inactivity remains a major public health concern globally, prompting the need for scalable, cost-effective interventions. Artificial Intelligence-driven Virtual Assistants (AIVAs) such as chatbots and virtual agents have emerged as novel methods to promote physical activity (PA), yet their effectiveness compared to traditional strategies remains unclear. This systematic review aimed at examining the characteristics, strategies, and effectiveness of AIVAs in promoting PA in adults and to compare them with traditional interventions. A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane was conducted through May 2025. Eight interventional studies that employed AIVAs targeting PA were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Intervention characteristics, outcomes, and behavioral strategies were extracted and synthesized. AIVAs were found to incorporate established behavior change techniques such as goal setting, feedback, and motivational support. Several studies demonstrated positive effects on PA metrics such as step counts and moderate to vigorous PA, though results were heterogeneous. Engagement and usability were generally high, particularly in interventions incorporating relational features. Compared to traditional interventions, AIVAs offered advantages in scalability and user autonomy but often lacked rigorous designs and long-term evaluation. AIVAs show promise as complementary tools for PA promotion, potentially overcoming scalability barriers associated with human-delivered programs. However, future research should prioritize methodologically robust designs, long-term assessments, and hybrid models that integrate both human and AI elements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11361-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11361-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11361-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
缺乏身体活动仍然是全球主要的公共卫生问题,因此需要采取可扩展的、具有成本效益的干预措施。人工智能驱动的虚拟助手(AIVAs),如聊天机器人和虚拟代理,已经成为促进身体活动(PA)的新方法,但与传统策略相比,它们的有效性尚不清楚。本系统综述旨在研究AIVAs在促进成人PA方面的特点、策略和有效性,并将其与传统干预措施进行比较。到2025年5月,对Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和Cochrane进行了系统搜索。纳入了8项采用AIVAs靶向PA的介入研究。使用ROBINS-I和rob2工具评估偏倚风险。提取并综合干预特征、结果和行为策略。研究发现,AIVAs结合了既定的行为改变技术,如目标设定、反馈和动机支持。几项研究证明了对步数和中度到剧烈的PA等PA指标的积极影响,尽管结果是异质的。参与度和可用性通常很高,特别是在结合关系特征的干预中。与传统干预措施相比,AIVAs在可扩展性和用户自主性方面具有优势,但往往缺乏严格的设计和长期评估。aiva有望作为PA推广的补充工具,潜在地克服与人工交付程序相关的可扩展性障碍。然而,未来的研究应该优先考虑方法学上稳健的设计、长期评估以及整合人类和人工智能元素的混合模型。
AI in motion: a systematic review of artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistants for physical activity promotion and their comparison with traditional strategies
Physical inactivity remains a major public health concern globally, prompting the need for scalable, cost-effective interventions. Artificial Intelligence-driven Virtual Assistants (AIVAs) such as chatbots and virtual agents have emerged as novel methods to promote physical activity (PA), yet their effectiveness compared to traditional strategies remains unclear. This systematic review aimed at examining the characteristics, strategies, and effectiveness of AIVAs in promoting PA in adults and to compare them with traditional interventions. A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane was conducted through May 2025. Eight interventional studies that employed AIVAs targeting PA were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. Intervention characteristics, outcomes, and behavioral strategies were extracted and synthesized. AIVAs were found to incorporate established behavior change techniques such as goal setting, feedback, and motivational support. Several studies demonstrated positive effects on PA metrics such as step counts and moderate to vigorous PA, though results were heterogeneous. Engagement and usability were generally high, particularly in interventions incorporating relational features. Compared to traditional interventions, AIVAs offered advantages in scalability and user autonomy but often lacked rigorous designs and long-term evaluation. AIVAs show promise as complementary tools for PA promotion, potentially overcoming scalability barriers associated with human-delivered programs. However, future research should prioritize methodologically robust designs, long-term assessments, and hybrid models that integrate both human and AI elements.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.