办公楼周边区域辐射顶板的试验评价

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Hung Q. Do , Mark B. Luther , Jane Matthews , Igor Martek
{"title":"办公楼周边区域辐射顶板的试验评价","authors":"Hung Q. Do ,&nbsp;Mark B. Luther ,&nbsp;Jane Matthews ,&nbsp;Igor Martek","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lightweight and modular radiant ceiling panels are attracting increasing interest from researchers, project owners, and designers. However, their thermal performance and capacity to deliver comfort in perimeter office zones remain underexplored. This study evaluates the performance of a prototype lightweight radiant ceiling panel system in a test chamber constructed in Victoria, Australia, to emulate a north-facing perimeter office space. The system, designed for both heating and cooling, was assessed through two cooling test runs and one heating test run. Results show that the panels are highly responsive, thermally effective, and capable of maintaining thermal comfort, particularly under cooling conditions. The system achieved average capacities of 95 W/m<sup>2</sup> in cooling and 85 W/m<sup>2</sup> in heating. In cooling mode, it successfully countered perimeter solar heat gains while maintaining appropriate comfort levels. Heating, though viable, responded more slowly and produced significant vertical air temperature gradients, potentially causing local discomfort. To mitigate this, supplementary mechanical ventilation is recommended. While broadly consistent with prior research, the study highlights the need for at least three test runs in both heating and cooling to improve generalizability. Future experiments with an upgraded heat pump and improved storage tank are planned to validate and extend these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 116531"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evaluation of radiant ceiling panels in office building perimeter zones\",\"authors\":\"Hung Q. Do ,&nbsp;Mark B. Luther ,&nbsp;Jane Matthews ,&nbsp;Igor Martek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Lightweight and modular radiant ceiling panels are attracting increasing interest from researchers, project owners, and designers. However, their thermal performance and capacity to deliver comfort in perimeter office zones remain underexplored. This study evaluates the performance of a prototype lightweight radiant ceiling panel system in a test chamber constructed in Victoria, Australia, to emulate a north-facing perimeter office space. The system, designed for both heating and cooling, was assessed through two cooling test runs and one heating test run. Results show that the panels are highly responsive, thermally effective, and capable of maintaining thermal comfort, particularly under cooling conditions. The system achieved average capacities of 95 W/m<sup>2</sup> in cooling and 85 W/m<sup>2</sup> in heating. In cooling mode, it successfully countered perimeter solar heat gains while maintaining appropriate comfort levels. Heating, though viable, responded more slowly and produced significant vertical air temperature gradients, potentially causing local discomfort. To mitigate this, supplementary mechanical ventilation is recommended. While broadly consistent with prior research, the study highlights the need for at least three test runs in both heating and cooling to improve generalizability. Future experiments with an upgraded heat pump and improved storage tank are planned to validate and extend these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"349 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825012617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825012617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

轻量化和模块化的辐射天花板吸引了越来越多的研究人员、项目业主和设计师的兴趣。然而,它们的热性能和在周边办公区域提供舒适的能力仍未得到充分开发。本研究评估了在澳大利亚维多利亚州建造的测试室中原型轻质辐射天花板系统的性能,以模拟朝北的周边办公空间。该系统设计用于加热和冷却,通过两次冷却测试和一次加热测试进行评估。结果表明,该面板具有高响应性,热效率高,能够保持热舒适,特别是在冷却条件下。该系统的平均制冷能力为95 W/m2,制热能力为85 W/m2。在冷却模式下,它成功地抵消了周围的太阳热量增益,同时保持适当的舒适度。加热虽然可行,但反应较慢,并产生明显的垂直空气温度梯度,可能导致局部不适。为了缓解这种情况,建议补充机械通气。虽然与先前的研究大体一致,但该研究强调,需要在加热和冷却方面至少进行三次试验,以提高通用性。未来的实验计划使用升级的热泵和改进的储罐来验证和扩展这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental evaluation of radiant ceiling panels in office building perimeter zones
Lightweight and modular radiant ceiling panels are attracting increasing interest from researchers, project owners, and designers. However, their thermal performance and capacity to deliver comfort in perimeter office zones remain underexplored. This study evaluates the performance of a prototype lightweight radiant ceiling panel system in a test chamber constructed in Victoria, Australia, to emulate a north-facing perimeter office space. The system, designed for both heating and cooling, was assessed through two cooling test runs and one heating test run. Results show that the panels are highly responsive, thermally effective, and capable of maintaining thermal comfort, particularly under cooling conditions. The system achieved average capacities of 95 W/m2 in cooling and 85 W/m2 in heating. In cooling mode, it successfully countered perimeter solar heat gains while maintaining appropriate comfort levels. Heating, though viable, responded more slowly and produced significant vertical air temperature gradients, potentially causing local discomfort. To mitigate this, supplementary mechanical ventilation is recommended. While broadly consistent with prior research, the study highlights the need for at least three test runs in both heating and cooling to improve generalizability. Future experiments with an upgraded heat pump and improved storage tank are planned to validate and extend these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信