“慢性疼痛生理功能影响指数”(PFIICP)的开发和验证:形成模型方法。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Filipe Antunes, Nuno Sousa, Pedro Teixeira
{"title":"“慢性疼痛生理功能影响指数”(PFIICP)的开发和验证:形成模型方法。","authors":"Filipe Antunes, Nuno Sousa, Pedro Teixeira","doi":"10.20344/amp.23516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development and validation of reliable and valid instruments to assess chronic pain and its impact on daily functioning are crucial in both clinical and research settings. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the scale 'Physical Function Impact Index on Chronic Pain' - PFIICP, a novel 12-item questionnaire designed to evaluate the physical functional impact of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A formative measurement model was used. In comparison with other established scales that have emotional, cognitive and social considerations, PFIICP is designed to be more objective, as it focuses only on the relationship between physical performance and the subject's pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from n = 285 patients at baseline and n = 58 patients at follow-up (3 - 6 months later). Spearman's rho correlations between the 12 items ranged from 0.153 to 0.793, all statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that each item contributes uniquely to the construct. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.731 - 0.833), demonstrating good stability over time. Convergent validity was supported by strong Pearson correlations with established measures, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; r = 0.739, p < 0.05) and the Pain Disability Index (PDI; r = 0.739, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the PFIICP is a robust tool for assessing the functional impact of chronic pain through a formative model approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7059,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica portuguesa","volume":"38 10","pages":"629-634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the \\\"Physical Functional Impact Index on Chronic Pain\\\" (PFIICP): A Formative Model Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Filipe Antunes, Nuno Sousa, Pedro Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.20344/amp.23516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development and validation of reliable and valid instruments to assess chronic pain and its impact on daily functioning are crucial in both clinical and research settings. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the scale 'Physical Function Impact Index on Chronic Pain' - PFIICP, a novel 12-item questionnaire designed to evaluate the physical functional impact of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A formative measurement model was used. In comparison with other established scales that have emotional, cognitive and social considerations, PFIICP is designed to be more objective, as it focuses only on the relationship between physical performance and the subject's pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from n = 285 patients at baseline and n = 58 patients at follow-up (3 - 6 months later). Spearman's rho correlations between the 12 items ranged from 0.153 to 0.793, all statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that each item contributes uniquely to the construct. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.731 - 0.833), demonstrating good stability over time. Convergent validity was supported by strong Pearson correlations with established measures, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; r = 0.739, p < 0.05) and the Pain Disability Index (PDI; r = 0.739, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the PFIICP is a robust tool for assessing the functional impact of chronic pain through a formative model approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica portuguesa\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"629-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica portuguesa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床和研究中,开发和验证可靠和有效的工具来评估慢性疼痛及其对日常功能的影响是至关重要的。本研究的目的是开发和验证“慢性疼痛的身体功能影响指数”- PFIICP量表,这是一个新的12项问卷,旨在评估慢性疼痛对身体功能的影响。方法:采用形成性测量模型。与其他考虑情感、认知和社会因素的现有量表相比,PFIICP的设计更加客观,因为它只关注身体表现与受试者疼痛之间的关系。结果:基线时n = 285例,随访(3 - 6个月)时n = 58例。12个项目之间的Spearman’s rho相关系数范围为0.153 ~ 0.793,均具有统计学显著性(p < 0.05),表明每个项目对构建的贡献是独特的。重测信度的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.788 (95% CI: 0.731 - 0.833),具有较好的稳定性。与已建立的测量方法(包括简短疼痛量表(BPI, r = 0.739, p < 0.05)和疼痛残疾指数(PDI, r = 0.739, p < 0.05)的强Pearson相关性支持了趋同效度。结论:这些发现表明PFIICP是通过形成模型方法评估慢性疼痛功能影响的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of the "Physical Functional Impact Index on Chronic Pain" (PFIICP): A Formative Model Approach.

Introduction: The development and validation of reliable and valid instruments to assess chronic pain and its impact on daily functioning are crucial in both clinical and research settings. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the scale 'Physical Function Impact Index on Chronic Pain' - PFIICP, a novel 12-item questionnaire designed to evaluate the physical functional impact of chronic pain.

Methods: A formative measurement model was used. In comparison with other established scales that have emotional, cognitive and social considerations, PFIICP is designed to be more objective, as it focuses only on the relationship between physical performance and the subject's pain.

Results: Data were collected from n = 285 patients at baseline and n = 58 patients at follow-up (3 - 6 months later). Spearman's rho correlations between the 12 items ranged from 0.153 to 0.793, all statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that each item contributes uniquely to the construct. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.731 - 0.833), demonstrating good stability over time. Convergent validity was supported by strong Pearson correlations with established measures, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; r = 0.739, p < 0.05) and the Pain Disability Index (PDI; r = 0.739, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the PFIICP is a robust tool for assessing the functional impact of chronic pain through a formative model approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica portuguesa
Acta medica portuguesa MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Acta Médica Portuguesa is to publish original research and review articles in biomedical areas of the highest standard, covering several domains of medical knowledge, with the purpose to help doctors improve medical care. In order to accomplish these aims, Acta Médica Portuguesa publishes original articles, review articles, case reports and editorials, among others, with a focus on clinical, scientific, social, political and economic factors affecting health. Acta Médica Portuguesa will be happy to consider manuscripts for publication from authors anywhere in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信