智障患者的自杀与自残:系统回顾与元分析。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sara Lindstedt, Christian Rück, Tatja Hirvikoski, Emma Hintze, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Leoni Grossmann, John Wallert, Johan Bjureberg, Oskar Flygare
{"title":"智障患者的自杀与自残:系统回顾与元分析。","authors":"Sara Lindstedt, Christian Rück, Tatja Hirvikoski, Emma Hintze, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Leoni Grossmann, John Wallert, Johan Bjureberg, Oskar Flygare","doi":"10.1111/jir.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are disproportionately exposed to several risk factors for suicidality. However, no meta-analysis has yet quantified the relative risk of suicide and self-harm, including suicide attempts, within this population. The aim of this project was to bring together and synthesise the research on suicidality among individuals with ID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched from inception through 4 August 2025. Observational studies with a quantitative design, evaluating the relative risk of suicide or self-harm, including suicide attempts, in individuals with and without ID, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using a shortened version of the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) checklist. A random effects model was used to synthesise the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven primary studies were included in the review (n = 241 438). The level of ID severity was only presented in two articles. Compared to the general population, the pooled relative risk for death by suicide was 0.54 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.89, k = 6, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%) and the relative risk for self-harm was 3.16, (95% CI 2.3 to 4.35, k = 6, I<sup>2</sup> = 89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that individuals with ID have an elevated risk of self-harm but a lower risk of dying by suicide compared to the general population. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of primary studies and substantial between-study heterogeneity. Further, separate analyses of mild versus moderate-to-profound ID are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide and Self-Harm in Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Lindstedt, Christian Rück, Tatja Hirvikoski, Emma Hintze, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Leoni Grossmann, John Wallert, Johan Bjureberg, Oskar Flygare\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are disproportionately exposed to several risk factors for suicidality. However, no meta-analysis has yet quantified the relative risk of suicide and self-harm, including suicide attempts, within this population. The aim of this project was to bring together and synthesise the research on suicidality among individuals with ID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched from inception through 4 August 2025. Observational studies with a quantitative design, evaluating the relative risk of suicide or self-harm, including suicide attempts, in individuals with and without ID, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using a shortened version of the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) checklist. A random effects model was used to synthesise the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven primary studies were included in the review (n = 241 438). The level of ID severity was only presented in two articles. Compared to the general population, the pooled relative risk for death by suicide was 0.54 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.89, k = 6, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%) and the relative risk for self-harm was 3.16, (95% CI 2.3 to 4.35, k = 6, I<sup>2</sup> = 89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that individuals with ID have an elevated risk of self-harm but a lower risk of dying by suicide compared to the general population. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of primary studies and substantial between-study heterogeneity. Further, separate analyses of mild versus moderate-to-profound ID are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:智力残疾(ID)的个体不成比例地暴露于几种自杀风险因素中。然而,目前还没有荟萃分析量化这一人群中自杀和自残(包括自杀企图)的相对风险。这个项目的目的是汇集和综合对ID患者自杀行为的研究。方法:进行系统综述和荟萃分析。Medline, Embase, Web of Science和PsycInfo从创立到2025年8月4日进行了检索。采用定量设计的观察性研究,评估有或没有身份证的人自杀或自残的相对风险,包括自杀企图。偏倚风险评估采用缩短版的非随机暴露研究偏倚风险(ROBINS-E)检查表。随机效应模型用于综合结果。结果:综述纳入了11项初步研究(n = 241 438)。ID的严重程度仅在两篇文章中出现。与一般人群相比,自杀死亡的总相对风险为0.54 (95% CI 0.33 ~ 0.89, k = 6, I2 = 77%),自残的相对风险为3.16 (95% CI 2.3 ~ 4.35, k = 6, I2 = 89%)。结论:研究结果表明,与一般人群相比,ID患者有较高的自残风险,但死于自杀的风险较低。然而,由于初步研究数量有限,且研究间存在较大异质性,因此对这些结果的解释应谨慎。此外,有必要对轻度与中度至深度的ID进行单独分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicide and Self-Harm in Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are disproportionately exposed to several risk factors for suicidality. However, no meta-analysis has yet quantified the relative risk of suicide and self-harm, including suicide attempts, within this population. The aim of this project was to bring together and synthesise the research on suicidality among individuals with ID.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched from inception through 4 August 2025. Observational studies with a quantitative design, evaluating the relative risk of suicide or self-harm, including suicide attempts, in individuals with and without ID, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using a shortened version of the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) checklist. A random effects model was used to synthesise the results.

Results: Eleven primary studies were included in the review (n = 241 438). The level of ID severity was only presented in two articles. Compared to the general population, the pooled relative risk for death by suicide was 0.54 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.89, k = 6, I2 = 77%) and the relative risk for self-harm was 3.16, (95% CI 2.3 to 4.35, k = 6, I2 = 89%).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that individuals with ID have an elevated risk of self-harm but a lower risk of dying by suicide compared to the general population. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of primary studies and substantial between-study heterogeneity. Further, separate analyses of mild versus moderate-to-profound ID are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信