中学生的语言推理:母语语法教育中句法功能识别的案例

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amina Hallab , Andreas Trotzke
{"title":"中学生的语言推理:母语语法教育中句法功能识别的案例","authors":"Amina Hallab ,&nbsp;Andreas Trotzke","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ability to identify syntactic functions is a core learning objective in L1 grammar education in the German school system. We present an intervention study that explored the benefits of introducing secondary school students to linguistic concepts such as event structure, constituency, syntactic arguments vs. adjuncts, and the diversity of case assignment in German. We tested the performance of two different groups of secondary schoolers: One was taught according to traditional textbook materials; the other group received the linguistic intervention. Our results are mixed. On the one hand, both groups persist on traditional strategies that are linguistically insufficient and known to lead to false predictions. On the other hand, the linguistic intervention seems to complement those deficient strategies and overall leads to better performance in identifying syntactic functions. We conclude that instead of revolutionizing current school curricula, linguistics should tailor its theoretical concepts to the traditional concepts in a way that the linguistic tools put the insufficient strategies in perspective without abandoning them altogether.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 101467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic reasoning for secondary school students: The case of identifying syntactic functions in L1 grammar education\",\"authors\":\"Amina Hallab ,&nbsp;Andreas Trotzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ability to identify syntactic functions is a core learning objective in L1 grammar education in the German school system. We present an intervention study that explored the benefits of introducing secondary school students to linguistic concepts such as event structure, constituency, syntactic arguments vs. adjuncts, and the diversity of case assignment in German. We tested the performance of two different groups of secondary schoolers: One was taught according to traditional textbook materials; the other group received the linguistic intervention. Our results are mixed. On the one hand, both groups persist on traditional strategies that are linguistically insufficient and known to lead to false predictions. On the other hand, the linguistic intervention seems to complement those deficient strategies and overall leads to better performance in identifying syntactic functions. We conclude that instead of revolutionizing current school curricula, linguistics should tailor its theoretical concepts to the traditional concepts in a way that the linguistic tools put the insufficient strategies in perspective without abandoning them altogether.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589825000841\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589825000841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别句法功能的能力是德国学校系统中母语语法教育的核心学习目标。我们提出了一项干预研究,探讨了向中学生介绍语言概念的好处,如事件结构,选区,句法论点与辅助词,以及德语案例分配的多样性。我们测试了两组不同的中学生的表现:一组根据传统教材进行教学;另一组接受语言干预。我们的结果喜忧参半。一方面,这两个群体都坚持传统的策略,这些策略在语言上是不充分的,并且已知会导致错误的预测。另一方面,语言干预似乎弥补了这些不足的策略,并在识别句法功能方面取得了更好的成绩。我们得出的结论是,语言学不应该彻底改变当前的学校课程,而是应该根据传统概念调整其理论概念,使语言工具能够正确看待不足的策略,而不是完全放弃它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linguistic reasoning for secondary school students: The case of identifying syntactic functions in L1 grammar education
The ability to identify syntactic functions is a core learning objective in L1 grammar education in the German school system. We present an intervention study that explored the benefits of introducing secondary school students to linguistic concepts such as event structure, constituency, syntactic arguments vs. adjuncts, and the diversity of case assignment in German. We tested the performance of two different groups of secondary schoolers: One was taught according to traditional textbook materials; the other group received the linguistic intervention. Our results are mixed. On the one hand, both groups persist on traditional strategies that are linguistically insufficient and known to lead to false predictions. On the other hand, the linguistic intervention seems to complement those deficient strategies and overall leads to better performance in identifying syntactic functions. We conclude that instead of revolutionizing current school curricula, linguistics should tailor its theoretical concepts to the traditional concepts in a way that the linguistic tools put the insufficient strategies in perspective without abandoning them altogether.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信