全球英语中的英语多元性

IF 4.5 1区文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS

Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101253

Yachao Sun

{"title":"全球英语中的英语多元性","authors":"Yachao Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This response to Christine Tardy’s paper affirms the value of Global Englishes (GE) and Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) for multilingual writing while arguing that effective implementation requires an explicit ideological stance on English plurality within GE. Drawing on frameworks between World Englishes (WE) and translingualism, and on the homogenizing tendencies of GenAI, this response paper contends that teachers need guidance for when to preserve, adapt, or normalize linguistic features. Building on Tardy’s “why” and “what,” this paper focuses on “how”: calling for clarifying English plurality within GE to inform instruction, assessment, and calibrated GenAI use, thereby fostering inclusive, rhetorically responsive, and transparent classroom ecologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The plurality of English in Global Englishes\",\"authors\":\"Yachao Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This response to Christine Tardy’s paper affirms the value of Global Englishes (GE) and Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) for multilingual writing while arguing that effective implementation requires an explicit ideological stance on English plurality within GE. Drawing on frameworks between World Englishes (WE) and translingualism, and on the homogenizing tendencies of GenAI, this response paper contends that teachers need guidance for when to preserve, adapt, or normalize linguistic features. Building on Tardy’s “why” and “what,” this paper focuses on “how”: calling for clarifying English plurality within GE to inform instruction, assessment, and calibrated GenAI use, thereby fostering inclusive, rhetorically responsive, and transparent classroom ecologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000785\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000785","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对Christine Tardy的论文的回应肯定了全球英语（GE）和全球英语语言教学（GELT）对多语言写作的价值，同时认为有效实施需要在GE内部对英语多元化有明确的意识形态立场。根据世界英语和翻译主义之间的框架，以及GenAI的同质化趋势，这篇回应论文认为，教师需要指导何时保留、适应或规范语言特征。以Tardy的“为什么”和“什么”为基础，本文将重点放在“如何”上：呼吁澄清通用电气内部的英语多元化，以指导教学、评估和校准通用电气的使用，从而促进包容、修辞反应和透明的课堂生态。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The plurality of English in Global Englishes

This response to Christine Tardy’s paper affirms the value of Global Englishes (GE) and Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) for multilingual writing while arguing that effective implementation requires an explicit ideological stance on English plurality within GE. Drawing on frameworks between World Englishes (WE) and translingualism, and on the homogenizing tendencies of GenAI, this response paper contends that teachers need guidance for when to preserve, adapt, or normalize linguistic features. Building on Tardy’s “why” and “what,” this paper focuses on “how”: calling for clarifying English plurality within GE to inform instruction, assessment, and calibrated GenAI use, thereby fostering inclusive, rhetorically responsive, and transparent classroom ecologies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Second Language Writing LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

8.80

自引率

13.10%

发文量

审稿时长

59 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.