Isaac Vaughn Ealing MD , Sarah Whereat PhD , Rowena Forsyth PhD , Jonathan Hong FRACS , Jerome Laurence PhD, FRACS
{"title":"澳大利亚普外科培训中可信赖的专业活动的评估:外科医生和学员的观点。","authors":"Isaac Vaughn Ealing MD , Sarah Whereat PhD , Rowena Forsyth PhD , Jonathan Hong FRACS , Jerome Laurence PhD, FRACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>In 2022 the General Surgical Education and Training program was implemented in Australia with a focus on competency-based medical education. This program utilized entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to provide a framework for teaching and assessing competencies.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>To investigate the implementation of EPAs in the General Surgical Education and Training program, interviews were conducted with both surgeons and trainees across Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and synthesized into the Technology Acceptance Model.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Ten surgeons and 10 trainees were interviewed across Australia. Thirteen major themes were identified. Overall, EPAs were perceived as easy to use, with suggestions to improve functionality. Surgeons and trainees perceived their usefulness as creating a shared learning model, whilst educational and assessment value was lacking. Attitudes towards their use could be characterized as “tick-box tasks.” Actual use was retrospective, reflecting only a narrow spectrum of operative cases. Assessment was often irrespective of a trainees performance, and comment boxes were not filled in.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>The implementation of EPAs in Australian general surgical training has had both intended and unintended implications. Improving the ease of use, and perceived usefulness of these tools for surgeons and trainees will improve attitudes towards use, and help align the intended and actual use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 11","pages":"Article 103707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Entrustable Professional Activities Implemented in Australian General Surgical Training: Perspectives of Surgeons and Trainees\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Vaughn Ealing MD , Sarah Whereat PhD , Rowena Forsyth PhD , Jonathan Hong FRACS , Jerome Laurence PhD, FRACS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>In 2022 the General Surgical Education and Training program was implemented in Australia with a focus on competency-based medical education. This program utilized entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to provide a framework for teaching and assessing competencies.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>To investigate the implementation of EPAs in the General Surgical Education and Training program, interviews were conducted with both surgeons and trainees across Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and synthesized into the Technology Acceptance Model.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Ten surgeons and 10 trainees were interviewed across Australia. Thirteen major themes were identified. Overall, EPAs were perceived as easy to use, with suggestions to improve functionality. Surgeons and trainees perceived their usefulness as creating a shared learning model, whilst educational and assessment value was lacking. Attitudes towards their use could be characterized as “tick-box tasks.” Actual use was retrospective, reflecting only a narrow spectrum of operative cases. Assessment was often irrespective of a trainees performance, and comment boxes were not filled in.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>The implementation of EPAs in Australian general surgical training has had both intended and unintended implications. Improving the ease of use, and perceived usefulness of these tools for surgeons and trainees will improve attitudes towards use, and help align the intended and actual use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 103707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Entrustable Professional Activities Implemented in Australian General Surgical Training: Perspectives of Surgeons and Trainees
BACKGROUND
In 2022 the General Surgical Education and Training program was implemented in Australia with a focus on competency-based medical education. This program utilized entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to provide a framework for teaching and assessing competencies.
METHODS
To investigate the implementation of EPAs in the General Surgical Education and Training program, interviews were conducted with both surgeons and trainees across Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and synthesized into the Technology Acceptance Model.
RESULTS
Ten surgeons and 10 trainees were interviewed across Australia. Thirteen major themes were identified. Overall, EPAs were perceived as easy to use, with suggestions to improve functionality. Surgeons and trainees perceived their usefulness as creating a shared learning model, whilst educational and assessment value was lacking. Attitudes towards their use could be characterized as “tick-box tasks.” Actual use was retrospective, reflecting only a narrow spectrum of operative cases. Assessment was often irrespective of a trainees performance, and comment boxes were not filled in.
CONCLUSION
The implementation of EPAs in Australian general surgical training has had both intended and unintended implications. Improving the ease of use, and perceived usefulness of these tools for surgeons and trainees will improve attitudes towards use, and help align the intended and actual use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.