澳大利亚普外科培训中可信赖的专业活动的评估:外科医生和学员的观点。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Isaac Vaughn Ealing MD , Sarah Whereat PhD , Rowena Forsyth PhD , Jonathan Hong FRACS , Jerome Laurence PhD, FRACS
{"title":"澳大利亚普外科培训中可信赖的专业活动的评估:外科医生和学员的观点。","authors":"Isaac Vaughn Ealing MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Whereat PhD ,&nbsp;Rowena Forsyth PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Hong FRACS ,&nbsp;Jerome Laurence PhD, FRACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>In 2022 the General Surgical Education and Training program was implemented in Australia with a focus on competency-based medical education. This program utilized entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to provide a framework for teaching and assessing competencies.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>To investigate the implementation of EPAs in the General Surgical Education and Training program, interviews were conducted with both surgeons and trainees across Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and synthesized into the Technology Acceptance Model.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Ten surgeons and 10 trainees were interviewed across Australia. Thirteen major themes were identified. Overall, EPAs were perceived as easy to use, with suggestions to improve functionality. Surgeons and trainees perceived their usefulness as creating a shared learning model, whilst educational and assessment value was lacking. Attitudes towards their use could be characterized as “tick-box tasks.” Actual use was retrospective, reflecting only a narrow spectrum of operative cases. Assessment was often irrespective of a trainees performance, and comment boxes were not filled in.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>The implementation of EPAs in Australian general surgical training has had both intended and unintended implications. Improving the ease of use, and perceived usefulness of these tools for surgeons and trainees will improve attitudes towards use, and help align the intended and actual use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 11","pages":"Article 103707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Entrustable Professional Activities Implemented in Australian General Surgical Training: Perspectives of Surgeons and Trainees\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Vaughn Ealing MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Whereat PhD ,&nbsp;Rowena Forsyth PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Hong FRACS ,&nbsp;Jerome Laurence PhD, FRACS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>In 2022 the General Surgical Education and Training program was implemented in Australia with a focus on competency-based medical education. This program utilized entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to provide a framework for teaching and assessing competencies.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>To investigate the implementation of EPAs in the General Surgical Education and Training program, interviews were conducted with both surgeons and trainees across Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and synthesized into the Technology Acceptance Model.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Ten surgeons and 10 trainees were interviewed across Australia. Thirteen major themes were identified. Overall, EPAs were perceived as easy to use, with suggestions to improve functionality. Surgeons and trainees perceived their usefulness as creating a shared learning model, whilst educational and assessment value was lacking. Attitudes towards their use could be characterized as “tick-box tasks.” Actual use was retrospective, reflecting only a narrow spectrum of operative cases. Assessment was often irrespective of a trainees performance, and comment boxes were not filled in.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>The implementation of EPAs in Australian general surgical training has had both intended and unintended implications. Improving the ease of use, and perceived usefulness of these tools for surgeons and trainees will improve attitudes towards use, and help align the intended and actual use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 103707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2022年,澳大利亚实施了普外科教育和培训计划,重点是基于能力的医学教育。该计划利用可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)来提供教学和评估能力的框架。方法:为了调查EPAs在普通外科教育和培训计划中的实施情况,对澳大利亚各地的外科医生和实习生进行了访谈。采用归纳主题分析法对访谈进行分析,并综合成技术接受模型。结果:对澳大利亚10名外科医生和10名实习生进行了访谈。确定了13个主要主题。总体而言,EPAs被认为易于使用,并提出了改进功能的建议。外科医生和受训者认为他们的作用是创造一个共享的学习模式,而缺乏教育和评估价值。对其使用的态度可以被描述为“勾选框任务”。实际使用是回顾性的,仅反映了一小部分手术病例。评估通常与学员的表现无关,评论框也没有填写。结论:EPAs在澳大利亚普外科培训中的实施既有有意的也有无意的影响。提高外科医生和受训者对这些工具的易用性和感知有用性,将改善对使用的态度,并有助于使预期和实际使用保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Entrustable Professional Activities Implemented in Australian General Surgical Training: Perspectives of Surgeons and Trainees

BACKGROUND

In 2022 the General Surgical Education and Training program was implemented in Australia with a focus on competency-based medical education. This program utilized entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to provide a framework for teaching and assessing competencies.

METHODS

To investigate the implementation of EPAs in the General Surgical Education and Training program, interviews were conducted with both surgeons and trainees across Australia. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and synthesized into the Technology Acceptance Model.

RESULTS

Ten surgeons and 10 trainees were interviewed across Australia. Thirteen major themes were identified. Overall, EPAs were perceived as easy to use, with suggestions to improve functionality. Surgeons and trainees perceived their usefulness as creating a shared learning model, whilst educational and assessment value was lacking. Attitudes towards their use could be characterized as “tick-box tasks.” Actual use was retrospective, reflecting only a narrow spectrum of operative cases. Assessment was often irrespective of a trainees performance, and comment boxes were not filled in.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of EPAs in Australian general surgical training has had both intended and unintended implications. Improving the ease of use, and perceived usefulness of these tools for surgeons and trainees will improve attitudes towards use, and help align the intended and actual use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信