西澳大利亚的酒类定价和折扣:确定低于假设最低单价的产品。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tazman Davies, Tina Lam, Simone Pettigrew
{"title":"西澳大利亚的酒类定价和折扣:确定低于假设最低单价的产品。","authors":"Tazman Davies, Tina Lam, Simone Pettigrew","doi":"10.1111/dar.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimum unit pricing (MUP), which involves setting a floor price for alcoholic beverages based on their alcohol content, has been shown to reduce alcohol-related harms. This study identified alcoholic beverages in Western Australia that may be affected by three minimum unit price thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In September 2024, we web-scraped product information for 16,645 alcoholic beverages listed on the online stores of two major alcohol retail chains in Perth, Australia. We identified the proportion of products that were priced below three floor price thresholds ($1.30, $1.50 and $1.75 per standard drink), both overall and across six alcohol categories. We further identified the proportion of all products with a promoted price (e.g., 'was $10, now $8') that fell below each threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A small proportion of alcohol products were priced below the $1.30, $1.50 and $1.75 floor price thresholds (4%, 5% and 7%, respectively). The majority of cask wine products were priced below each threshold (86%, 88% and 89%, respectively), whereas only a small fraction of cider (9%, 12% and 28%), bottled wine (6%, 8% and 12%), beer (1%, 1% and 4%), spirits (0%, 0% and 1%) and premix drinks (0% for each) fell below these levels. Few products were promoted at a price below the corresponding thresholds (3%, 4% and 5%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Most alcohol prices would be unaffected by MUP thresholds ranging from $1.30 to $1.75. Communicating this finding could increase the general acceptability of the policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alcohol Pricing and Discounting in Western Australia: Identifying Products Below Hypothetical Minimum Unit Prices.\",\"authors\":\"Tazman Davies, Tina Lam, Simone Pettigrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimum unit pricing (MUP), which involves setting a floor price for alcoholic beverages based on their alcohol content, has been shown to reduce alcohol-related harms. This study identified alcoholic beverages in Western Australia that may be affected by three minimum unit price thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In September 2024, we web-scraped product information for 16,645 alcoholic beverages listed on the online stores of two major alcohol retail chains in Perth, Australia. We identified the proportion of products that were priced below three floor price thresholds ($1.30, $1.50 and $1.75 per standard drink), both overall and across six alcohol categories. We further identified the proportion of all products with a promoted price (e.g., 'was $10, now $8') that fell below each threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A small proportion of alcohol products were priced below the $1.30, $1.50 and $1.75 floor price thresholds (4%, 5% and 7%, respectively). The majority of cask wine products were priced below each threshold (86%, 88% and 89%, respectively), whereas only a small fraction of cider (9%, 12% and 28%), bottled wine (6%, 8% and 12%), beer (1%, 1% and 4%), spirits (0%, 0% and 1%) and premix drinks (0% for each) fell below these levels. Few products were promoted at a price below the corresponding thresholds (3%, 4% and 5%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Most alcohol prices would be unaffected by MUP thresholds ranging from $1.30 to $1.75. Communicating this finding could increase the general acceptability of the policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:最低单位定价(MUP)涉及根据酒精含量为酒精饮料设定最低价格,已被证明可以减少与酒精有关的危害。本研究确定了西澳大利亚州的酒精饮料可能受到三个最低单价阈值的影响。方法:在2024年9月,我们在澳大利亚珀斯的两家主要酒类零售连锁店的网上商店中检索了16,645种酒精饮料的产品信息。我们确定了定价低于三个最低价格阈值(每种标准饮料1.30美元、1.50美元和1.75美元)的产品比例,包括总体和六种酒精类别。我们进一步确定了促销价格(例如,“原来是10美元,现在是8美元”)低于每个阈值的所有产品的比例。结果:一小部分酒精产品的定价低于1.30美元、1.50美元和1.75美元的最低价格阈值(分别为4%、5%和7%)。大多数桶装葡萄酒产品的价格低于每个门槛(分别为86%、88%和89%),而只有一小部分苹果酒(9%、12%和28%)、瓶装葡萄酒(6%、8%和12%)、啤酒(1%、1%和4%)、烈酒(0%、0%和1%)和预混饮料(各为0%)的价格低于这些门槛。很少有产品的促销价格低于相应的门槛(3%,4%和5%)。讨论和结论:大多数酒的价格不会受到从1.30美元到1.75美元的最低限额的影响。传达这一发现可以增加政策的普遍可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alcohol Pricing and Discounting in Western Australia: Identifying Products Below Hypothetical Minimum Unit Prices.

Introduction: Minimum unit pricing (MUP), which involves setting a floor price for alcoholic beverages based on their alcohol content, has been shown to reduce alcohol-related harms. This study identified alcoholic beverages in Western Australia that may be affected by three minimum unit price thresholds.

Methods: In September 2024, we web-scraped product information for 16,645 alcoholic beverages listed on the online stores of two major alcohol retail chains in Perth, Australia. We identified the proportion of products that were priced below three floor price thresholds ($1.30, $1.50 and $1.75 per standard drink), both overall and across six alcohol categories. We further identified the proportion of all products with a promoted price (e.g., 'was $10, now $8') that fell below each threshold.

Results: A small proportion of alcohol products were priced below the $1.30, $1.50 and $1.75 floor price thresholds (4%, 5% and 7%, respectively). The majority of cask wine products were priced below each threshold (86%, 88% and 89%, respectively), whereas only a small fraction of cider (9%, 12% and 28%), bottled wine (6%, 8% and 12%), beer (1%, 1% and 4%), spirits (0%, 0% and 1%) and premix drinks (0% for each) fell below these levels. Few products were promoted at a price below the corresponding thresholds (3%, 4% and 5%).

Discussion and conclusions: Most alcohol prices would be unaffected by MUP thresholds ranging from $1.30 to $1.75. Communicating this finding could increase the general acceptability of the policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信