Noemi Schoop-Kasteler, Verena Hofmann, Antonius H N Cillessen, Christoph M Müller
{"title":"智障学生受欢迎程度的预测因素:亲社会与反社会行为的作用。","authors":"Noemi Schoop-Kasteler, Verena Hofmann, Antonius H N Cillessen, Christoph M Müller","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2025.2564063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little attention has been given to the relationship between popularity and social behaviour among students with intellectual disabilities in special needs schools. Based on resource control theory and findings among typically developing students, we expected popularity predictors to include both prosocial and antisocial behaviours.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>School staff (<i>n</i> = 397) reported on popularity, prosocial, and antisocial behaviours of 1,125 students (<i>Mage</i> = 11.26 years, <i>SD</i> = 3.76; 69% boys) with intellectual disabilities in Swiss special needs schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel analyses showed that students with higher prosocial and antisocial behaviours at the start of the school year were more likely to be popular by the end, even after accounting for gender, age, adaptive behaviour, and initial popularity. The effect of antisocial behaviour on popularity was stronger for boys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support the universality of the relationship between prosocial and antisocial behaviours with popularity. Implications for students with intellectual disabilities are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of popularity among students with intellectual disabilities: The role of prosocial and antisocial behaviours.\",\"authors\":\"Noemi Schoop-Kasteler, Verena Hofmann, Antonius H N Cillessen, Christoph M Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13668250.2025.2564063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little attention has been given to the relationship between popularity and social behaviour among students with intellectual disabilities in special needs schools. Based on resource control theory and findings among typically developing students, we expected popularity predictors to include both prosocial and antisocial behaviours.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>School staff (<i>n</i> = 397) reported on popularity, prosocial, and antisocial behaviours of 1,125 students (<i>Mage</i> = 11.26 years, <i>SD</i> = 3.76; 69% boys) with intellectual disabilities in Swiss special needs schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel analyses showed that students with higher prosocial and antisocial behaviours at the start of the school year were more likely to be popular by the end, even after accounting for gender, age, adaptive behaviour, and initial popularity. The effect of antisocial behaviour on popularity was stronger for boys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support the universality of the relationship between prosocial and antisocial behaviours with popularity. Implications for students with intellectual disabilities are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2564063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2564063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of popularity among students with intellectual disabilities: The role of prosocial and antisocial behaviours.
Background: Little attention has been given to the relationship between popularity and social behaviour among students with intellectual disabilities in special needs schools. Based on resource control theory and findings among typically developing students, we expected popularity predictors to include both prosocial and antisocial behaviours.
Method: School staff (n = 397) reported on popularity, prosocial, and antisocial behaviours of 1,125 students (Mage = 11.26 years, SD = 3.76; 69% boys) with intellectual disabilities in Swiss special needs schools.
Results: Multilevel analyses showed that students with higher prosocial and antisocial behaviours at the start of the school year were more likely to be popular by the end, even after accounting for gender, age, adaptive behaviour, and initial popularity. The effect of antisocial behaviour on popularity was stronger for boys.
Conclusion: Findings support the universality of the relationship between prosocial and antisocial behaviours with popularity. Implications for students with intellectual disabilities are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.