赌博的研究重点:一项大规模专家研究的结果。

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Andrea Czakó, Marc N Potenza, David C Hodgins, Shu M Yu, Anise M S Wu, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Daniel King, Joël Billieux, Beáta Bőthe, Dan J Stein, Zsolt Demetrovics
{"title":"赌博的研究重点:一项大规模专家研究的结果。","authors":"Andrea Czakó, Marc N Potenza, David C Hodgins, Shu M Yu, Anise M S Wu, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Daniel King, Joël Billieux, Beáta Bőthe, Dan J Stein, Zsolt Demetrovics","doi":"10.1556/2006.2025.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While gambling is a growing public health concern, research resources are limited, and no guidance is available to prioritise research. This study aimed to identify priorities for gambling research on a global scale using a systematic, transparent, and democratic methodology to inform researchers and other stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Leading gambling researchers were invited to list gambling-related research questions that can contribute to strengthening evidence-based policy, prevention, and effective early intervention and treatment of problem gambling. Suggestions were consolidated into research options and evaluated against six criteria (Answerability, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Impact on equity and an additional two based on the category of research options: Novelty and Relevance for description-type, Potential for burden reduction and Deliverability for intervention-related options). Stakeholders (n = 14) assigned relative weights to each criterion, and options were ranked according to their weighted research priority scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With input from 46.9% of eligible researchers (n = 307) from 35 countries, 1,361 questions were consolidated into 102 options. Evaluations showed strong agreement between experts, and the top 25 priorities were identified. The results highlight the need for further knowledge about the epidemiology, etiology, and consequences of problem gambling. Top-priority topics indicate the importance of focusing on vulnerable and minority groups, youth, significant others, technological innovations, advertisements, the convergence of gaming and gambling, and co-occurring conditions. Evaluating and tailoring existing measures were prioritised more highly than new interventions, and identifying factors underlying treatment seeking, drop-out and relapse was also considered a priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This initiative successfully involved the global research community in identifying gambling research priorities. The results provide information for researchers and other stakeholders for future projects and funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":"14 3","pages":"1222-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research priorities in gambling: Findings of a large-scale expert study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Czakó, Marc N Potenza, David C Hodgins, Shu M Yu, Anise M S Wu, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Daniel King, Joël Billieux, Beáta Bőthe, Dan J Stein, Zsolt Demetrovics\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/2006.2025.00072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While gambling is a growing public health concern, research resources are limited, and no guidance is available to prioritise research. This study aimed to identify priorities for gambling research on a global scale using a systematic, transparent, and democratic methodology to inform researchers and other stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Leading gambling researchers were invited to list gambling-related research questions that can contribute to strengthening evidence-based policy, prevention, and effective early intervention and treatment of problem gambling. Suggestions were consolidated into research options and evaluated against six criteria (Answerability, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Impact on equity and an additional two based on the category of research options: Novelty and Relevance for description-type, Potential for burden reduction and Deliverability for intervention-related options). Stakeholders (n = 14) assigned relative weights to each criterion, and options were ranked according to their weighted research priority scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With input from 46.9% of eligible researchers (n = 307) from 35 countries, 1,361 questions were consolidated into 102 options. Evaluations showed strong agreement between experts, and the top 25 priorities were identified. The results highlight the need for further knowledge about the epidemiology, etiology, and consequences of problem gambling. Top-priority topics indicate the importance of focusing on vulnerable and minority groups, youth, significant others, technological innovations, advertisements, the convergence of gaming and gambling, and co-occurring conditions. Evaluating and tailoring existing measures were prioritised more highly than new interventions, and identifying factors underlying treatment seeking, drop-out and relapse was also considered a priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This initiative successfully involved the global research community in identifying gambling research priorities. The results provide information for researchers and other stakeholders for future projects and funding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Addictions\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"1222-1249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486284/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00072\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00072","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然赌博是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,但研究资源有限,而且没有指导方针来确定研究的优先次序。本研究旨在利用系统、透明和民主的方法,确定全球范围内赌博研究的优先事项,以告知研究人员和其他利益相关者。方法:邀请著名的赌博研究人员列出赌博相关的研究问题,这些问题有助于加强循证政策,预防和有效的早期干预和治疗问题赌博。建议被整合到研究方案中,并根据六个标准(可答性、可行性、有效性、对公平的影响,以及基于研究方案类别的另外两个标准:描述类型的新颖性和相关性、减少负担的潜力和干预相关方案的可交付性)进行评估。利益相关者(n = 14)为每个标准分配相对权重,并根据其加权研究优先级得分对选项进行排名。结果:来自35个国家的46.9%的符合条件的研究者(n = 307)将1361个问题整合为102个选项。评估显示专家之间的意见非常一致,并确定了前25个优先事项。研究结果强调需要进一步了解问题赌博的流行病学、病因学和后果。最优先的主题表明关注弱势群体和少数群体、青年、重要他人、技术创新、广告、游戏和赌博的融合以及共同发生的条件的重要性。评估和调整现有措施比新的干预措施更受重视,确定寻求治疗、退出和复发的潜在因素也被视为优先事项。结论:这一举措成功地涉及全球研究界确定赌博研究的优先事项。研究结果为研究人员和其他利益相关者未来的项目和资助提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Research priorities in gambling: Findings of a large-scale expert study.

Research priorities in gambling: Findings of a large-scale expert study.

Objective: While gambling is a growing public health concern, research resources are limited, and no guidance is available to prioritise research. This study aimed to identify priorities for gambling research on a global scale using a systematic, transparent, and democratic methodology to inform researchers and other stakeholders.

Methods: Leading gambling researchers were invited to list gambling-related research questions that can contribute to strengthening evidence-based policy, prevention, and effective early intervention and treatment of problem gambling. Suggestions were consolidated into research options and evaluated against six criteria (Answerability, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Impact on equity and an additional two based on the category of research options: Novelty and Relevance for description-type, Potential for burden reduction and Deliverability for intervention-related options). Stakeholders (n = 14) assigned relative weights to each criterion, and options were ranked according to their weighted research priority scores.

Results: With input from 46.9% of eligible researchers (n = 307) from 35 countries, 1,361 questions were consolidated into 102 options. Evaluations showed strong agreement between experts, and the top 25 priorities were identified. The results highlight the need for further knowledge about the epidemiology, etiology, and consequences of problem gambling. Top-priority topics indicate the importance of focusing on vulnerable and minority groups, youth, significant others, technological innovations, advertisements, the convergence of gaming and gambling, and co-occurring conditions. Evaluating and tailoring existing measures were prioritised more highly than new interventions, and identifying factors underlying treatment seeking, drop-out and relapse was also considered a priority.

Conclusions: This initiative successfully involved the global research community in identifying gambling research priorities. The results provide information for researchers and other stakeholders for future projects and funding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信