基于轻推的高血压和2型糖尿病患者自我监测干预的有效性、伦理性和可持续性:一项系统综述

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Jianing Yu, Haoyang Du, Erxu Xue, Yujia Fu, Lijin Chen, Jing Shao
{"title":"基于轻推的高血压和2型糖尿病患者自我监测干预的有效性、伦理性和可持续性:一项系统综述","authors":"Jianing Yu, Haoyang Du, Erxu Xue, Yujia Fu, Lijin Chen, Jing Shao","doi":"10.1037/hea0001564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness, ethics, and sustainability of nudge-based interventions in improving self-monitoring behaviors among patients with hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of seven databases (January 2008-October 2024) identified studies on nudge-based interventions for HTN and T2DM self-monitoring. Nudge strategies were categorized using Münscher et al.'s taxonomy of choice architecture, which includes \"decision information,\" \"decision architecture,\" and \"decision assistance.\" The included nudge-based interventions were evaluated across three domains: effectiveness, ethical quality, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (19 trials) were included in this review; 58% of the nudge-based interventions significantly improved self-monitoring adherence, and 47% yielded measurable improvements in clinical outcomes, such as reductions in blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin levels compared to usual care. Ethical evaluations revealed that the majority of nudge-based interventions exhibited above-average ethical quality. Regarding sustainability, while multicomponent interventions were common, they proved more difficult to implement due to higher resource demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the potential of nudge-based interventions to improve self-monitoring adherence among patients with HTN and T2DM. However, balancing effectiveness, ethical considerations, and sustainability will be crucial for optimizing these interventions in real-world settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness, ethics, and sustainability of nudge-based interventions for self-monitoring in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Jianing Yu, Haoyang Du, Erxu Xue, Yujia Fu, Lijin Chen, Jing Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness, ethics, and sustainability of nudge-based interventions in improving self-monitoring behaviors among patients with hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of seven databases (January 2008-October 2024) identified studies on nudge-based interventions for HTN and T2DM self-monitoring. Nudge strategies were categorized using Münscher et al.'s taxonomy of choice architecture, which includes \\\"decision information,\\\" \\\"decision architecture,\\\" and \\\"decision assistance.\\\" The included nudge-based interventions were evaluated across three domains: effectiveness, ethical quality, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (19 trials) were included in this review; 58% of the nudge-based interventions significantly improved self-monitoring adherence, and 47% yielded measurable improvements in clinical outcomes, such as reductions in blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin levels compared to usual care. Ethical evaluations revealed that the majority of nudge-based interventions exhibited above-average ethical quality. Regarding sustainability, while multicomponent interventions were common, they proved more difficult to implement due to higher resource demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the potential of nudge-based interventions to improve self-monitoring adherence among patients with HTN and T2DM. However, balancing effectiveness, ethical considerations, and sustainability will be crucial for optimizing these interventions in real-world settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估以轻推为基础的干预措施改善高血压(HTN)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者自我监测行为的有效性、伦理性和可持续性。方法:系统检索7个数据库(2008年1月至2024年10月),确定了HTN和T2DM自我监测中基于轻推干预的研究。使用m nscher等人的选择架构分类法对助推策略进行分类,其中包括“决策信息”、“决策架构”和“决策辅助”。所包括的基于轻推的干预措施在三个领域进行了评估:有效性、道德质量和可持续性。结果:本综述纳入17项研究(19项试验);58%的轻推干预显著改善了自我监测依从性,47%的临床结果有明显改善,如与常规护理相比血压和糖化血红蛋白水平的降低。伦理评估显示,大多数基于轻推的干预措施表现出高于平均水平的伦理质量。关于可持续性,虽然多成分干预措施很常见,但由于资源需求较高,它们较难执行。结论:本综述强调了以轻推为基础的干预措施改善HTN和T2DM患者自我监测依从性的潜力。然而,平衡有效性、伦理考虑和可持续性对于在现实环境中优化这些干预措施至关重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness, ethics, and sustainability of nudge-based interventions for self-monitoring in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.

Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness, ethics, and sustainability of nudge-based interventions in improving self-monitoring behaviors among patients with hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Method: A systematic search of seven databases (January 2008-October 2024) identified studies on nudge-based interventions for HTN and T2DM self-monitoring. Nudge strategies were categorized using Münscher et al.'s taxonomy of choice architecture, which includes "decision information," "decision architecture," and "decision assistance." The included nudge-based interventions were evaluated across three domains: effectiveness, ethical quality, and sustainability.

Results: Seventeen studies (19 trials) were included in this review; 58% of the nudge-based interventions significantly improved self-monitoring adherence, and 47% yielded measurable improvements in clinical outcomes, such as reductions in blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin levels compared to usual care. Ethical evaluations revealed that the majority of nudge-based interventions exhibited above-average ethical quality. Regarding sustainability, while multicomponent interventions were common, they proved more difficult to implement due to higher resource demands.

Conclusions: This review highlights the potential of nudge-based interventions to improve self-monitoring adherence among patients with HTN and T2DM. However, balancing effectiveness, ethical considerations, and sustainability will be crucial for optimizing these interventions in real-world settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信